Bitcoin Flags Shift to Risk-Off

Key Points

  • Brent Crude falls below $75 per barrel as the Strait of Hormuz gradually reopens.
  • However, crude oil reserves continue to decline.
  • Bitcoin is testing primary support, and stocks are weakening.
  • The Dollar is stronger, while Gold is testing primary support at $4,000 per ounce.

Brent Crude futures (Aug’26) fell below $75 per barrel on reports of increased traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

Brent Crude Futures (ICE August'26)

From HFI Research:

The market is pricing a clean reopening, right on schedule. I am not convinced…

A reopening is neither as close nor as clean as the market would have us believe. Tankers have to start entering the Gulf for shut-in wells to be brought back on production. Minesweeping alone takes weeks after any ceasefire, redirected tankers need 30 to 40 days to reposition, and Tehran can keep the mere threat of attack alive to throttle passage at will.

US Strategic Petroleum Reserves continue to decline at the rate of 9 million barrels a week, falling to 331 million barrels on June 19.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR)

The ceasefire remains tenuous, with hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon a potential flashpoint. From Reuters:

In Washington, Lebanon and Israel discussed a U.S.-backed proposal for Israel’s forces to pull out of ⁠some territory it ​invaded to be handed back to Lebanese army control. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would not pull troops out.

…At home, the reckoning is equally stark, said former U.S. official Dennis Ross. Netanyahu is increasingly boxed in between a U.S. president intent on ending the conflict and a domestic base resistant to ​concessions, particularly in Lebanon, he said. Withdrawal risks political backlash while escalation risks confrontation with Washington.

Bitcoin1 continues to test primary support at 60,000. A breach would warn of another decline, signaling a hard swing in financial markets away from risk assets.

Bitcoin (BTC)

The S&P 500 is in its fourth week of a mild sell-off, with declining Trend Index peaks indicating secondary selling pressure. A retracement to test support at 7000 is likely.

S&P 500

10-year Treasury yields are retracing for another test of support at 4.25% as lower oil prices ease inflation fears.

10-Year Treasury Yield

Dollar & Gold

The Dollar is strengthening in expectation of higher short-term interest rates, but new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh has yet to reveal his hand.

Dollar Index

Gold is testing primary support at $4,000 per ounce as the Dollar strengthens.

Spot Gold

Copper & Lithium

Energy metals are also experiencing a sell-off, with Copper and Lithium most prominent.

Copper

Sprott Copper Miners ETF2 (COPP) is headed for a test of primary support at 32, while Trend Index peaks below zero warn of long-term selling pressure.

Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP)

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF2 (LITP) is testing secondary support at 13. Declining Trend Index peaks warn of growing selling pressure, and a breach of support will likely test the primary level at 11.

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP)

Conclusion

The Dollar is strengthening amid expectations of higher short-term interest rates under the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh. But Warsh has yet to reveal his hand, and long-term Treasury yields are softening as fears of high inflation from spiking energy prices fade.

The ceasefire in the Persian Gulf is tenuous and could easily be disrupted by a flare-up of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Stability in the region is even further out of reach than it was before 28 February and will likely remain so. States will likely build up larger strategic reserves and develop strategies to reduce their exposure to another closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This includes encouraging the use of electric vehicles and nuclear energy, two industries that we expect to be long-term beneficiaries from the conflict.

The biggest losers will likely be the Gulf States and Israel. The Gulf States have suffered an enormous setback in their ability to project themselves as a stable financial and industrial hub for future development. They will fall under Iran’s shadow, which will be able to exert far greater political sway in the region. Israel is also likely to suffer under whatever peace deal President Trump negotiates, with a financially stronger Iran able to extend its influence in the region and unlikely to be deterred from its long-term aims of regional hegemony.

Gold and commodities are falling as the Dollar strengthens, but we are convinced that this runs counter to the secular trend, which will likely last for decades. Increased fiscal spending and growing deficits will accelerate the debasement of the Dollar and other fiat currencies, with central banks continuing their shift to Gold bullion as the primary reserve asset.

Acknowledgments

Notes

  1. Cryptocurrencies are the highest-risk asset class, and we analyze Bitcoin (BTC) solely to identify risk sentiment in financial markets. Our analysis is not a recommendation to buy or sell BTC, nor is it a commentary on the merits of cryptocurrency.
  2. We analyze exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to determine market sentiment towards a specific sector, industry, or commodity. The analysis is not a recommendation to buy or sell, nor is it a commentary on the merits of the particular ETF.

When Is a Deal Not a Deal?

Key Points

  • President Trump announces an imminent peace deal with Iran — for the 40th time.

[Content protected for Premium, Australian Growth, International Growth, Market Analysis members only] …..

If you are already a subscriber, please login to continue reading:

If you are not a subscriber, click here to find out more about our latest offer.

Ceasefire Falls Apart

Key Points

  • Israel stepped up airstrikes on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon.
  • Iran’s lead negotiator says a bilateral ceasefire is unreasonable in such a situation.
  • Iran attacked Saudi Arabia’s East-West Pipeline, which bypasses the Strait of Hormuz, just hours after the ceasefire ‌was agreed.
  • The United Arab Emirates carried out air strikes on Iranian production and refining facilities. Iran retaliates with a barrage of missiles and drones.
  • Ukraine defies calls to stop striking Russian energy facilities.
  • Brent crude bids for spot delivery at $144 per barrel, but no sellers.

[Content protected for Premium, Australian Growth, International Growth, Market Analysis members only] …..If you are already a subscriber, please login to continue reading:

If you are not a subscriber, to find out more click here

Israel strikes first

Summary

  • Israel struck nuclear facilities and military command structures in Iran
  • The government declared a state of emergency in anticipation of retaliatory attacks from Iran
  • US Secretary of State Rubio indicated that the US had been notified but was not involved in the strikes
  • Iran had earlier threatened to attack US bases in the Middle East in response to any attack

Israeli Premier & F35 Fighter Jet

Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu with F35 Fighter Jet

Israel launched dozens of air strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories, senior military commanders, and nuclear scientists on Friday, warning that this would be a prolonged operation. (FT & Reuters)

The strikes come after an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) resolution on Thursday declared Iran in noncompliance with its nuclear safeguards obligations for the first time in nearly 20 years….Iran’s uranium enrichment has reached 60% purity — a dramatically higher level that is a short technical step from the weapons-grade purity level of 90%. “A country enriching at 60% is a very serious thing. Only countries making bombs are reaching this level,” IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said in 2021. (CNBC)

Iran’s Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh told reporters Wednesday that if nuclear talks fail and “a conflict is imposed on us,” the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps “will target all U.S. bases in the host countries.”

A source familiar with the situation and a U.S. official told CBS News that the Trump administration was weighing options regarding how to support Israeli military action without leading it…
The source said the options are unlikely to include direct participation by U.S. B-2 bombers that carry the type of bombs that can penetrate Iran’s deep underground fortified uranium enrichment facilities at Fordow and Natanz. Without that type of strike, it is unlikely Israeli military action could destroy the underground portions of Iran’s program, and thus solo military action by Israel is presumed to be limited in its capability to fully eliminate the program. (CBS)

Conclusion

Israel won’t back down (I-W-B-D).

Israel faces an existential threat from a nuclear-armed Iran and will strike first in an attempt to eliminate the threat. The strikes may delay Iran’s uranium-enrichment program, but are unlikely to prevent the country’s leaders from pursuing their nuclear weapons goal.

The only way to eliminate the threat would be a full-scale invasion, which is likely beyond Israel’s capability. The US will offer support but is unlikely to become directly embroiled in the conflict unless attacked by Iran.

Oil prices are expected to spike due to supply concerns, while a flight to safety will likely boost gold demand.

Acknowledgments

Give War a Chance | Edward Luttwak

UN Peacekeepers in Bosnia

UN soldiers at a NATO base near Brcko, Bosnia, March 1998 | Juergen Schwarz, Reuters

This 1999 opinion in Foreign Affairs magazine, by Edward N. Luttwak, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, is relevant to today’s conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza:

An unpleasant truth often overlooked is that although war is a great evil, it does have a great virtue: it can resolve political conflicts and lead to peace. This can happen when all belligerents become exhausted or when one wins decisively….

A cease-fire tends to arrest war-induced exhaustion and lets belligerents reconstitute and rearm their forces. It intensifies and prolongs the struggle once the cease-fire ends—and it does usually end….

Read more at Foreign Affairs

Thoughts on Israel

We express our sympathy for the people of Israel who have suffered a brutal attack from HAMAS and its backers.

An act of such barbarity is bound to evoke a response and lead to further escalation of violence in the region. But that seems to be the intention.

Martin Indyk, former US Ambassador to Israel (1995-1997 and 2000-2001) and special envoy under President Obama for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations (2013-2014), was asked why this occurred now, after progress seemed to be made on an Israel-Palestine settlement:

I think you have to consider the context at this moment. The Arab world is coming to terms with Israel. Saudi Arabia is talking about normalizing relations with Israel. As part of that potential deal, the United States is pressing Israel to make concessions to the Palestinian Authority—Hamas’s enemy. So this was an opportunity for Hamas and its Iranian backers to disrupt the whole process, which I think in retrospect was deeply threatening to both of them. I don’t think that Hamas follows dictation from Iran, but I do think they act in coordination, and they had a common interest in disrupting the progress that was underway and that was gaining a lot of support among Arab populations. The idea was to embarrass those Arab leaders who have made peace with Israel, or who might do so, and to prove that Hamas and Iran are the ones who are able to inflict military defeat on Israel.

There are talks going on regarding a peace deal between Israel and Saudi Arabia, and conversations about U.S. security guarantees for Saudi Arabia. In all likelihood, a primary motivation for Hamas and Iran was a desire to disrupt that deal, because it threatened to isolate them. And this was a very good way to destroy its prospects, at least in the near term. Once the Palestinian issue returns to front and center, and Arabs around the Middle East are watching American weapons in Israeli hands killing large numbers of Palestinians, that will ignite a very strong reaction….

….And in terms of escalation, the party to watch most closely is Hezbollah. If the Palestinian death toll rises, Hezbollah will be tempted to join the fray. They have 150,000 rockets they can rain down on Israel’s main cities, and that will lead to an all-out war not just in Gaza but in Lebanon, too. And everybody would get dragged in that situation. (Foreign Affairs)

Conclusion

The aim of the attack was to provoke a violent retaliation which would disrupt an Arab-Israeli peace accord.
Starting another war would play into the perpetrator’s hands.
Netanyahu prides himself on being cautious. Now is the time to show restraint, bolster Israel’s defenses and continue to pursue peace in the region — which would sideline HAMAS and its Iranian backers.

Is Israel an Apartheid State?  | Bloomberg View

Congratulations to Jeffrey Goldberg for this opinion on John Kerry’s statement:

I will dissent from Boxer’s critique, both because I believe that Kerry is a pro-Israel secretary of state who worries about the Jewish state’s future, and because I myself have used the word “apartheid” not only to describe a possible terrible future for Israel, but also as a way of depicting some current and most unfortunate facts on the ground…….

I suppose this passage makes me an enemy of Israel, in the same way Kerry is an enemy of Israel, and in the same way that the former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (who is also Israel’s most decorated soldier) is an enemy of Israel, because Barak has also warned about the dangers of the status quo: “As long as in this territory west of the Jordan River there is only one political entity called Israel,” he said in 2010, “it is going to be either non-Jewish, or non-democratic. If this bloc of millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state.”

A two-state solution (the apartheid government in South Africa called them “bantustans”) will never resolve the conflict. Israelis face some hard choices.

Read more at Is Israel an Apartheid State?  – Bloomberg View.

Muslim, Zionist and proud | Ynetnews

British Muslim Kasim Hafeez writes about his visit to Israel:

I did not encounter an apartheid racist state, but rather, quite the opposite. I was confronted by synagogues, mosques and churches, by Jews and Arabs living together, by minorities playing huge parts in all areas of Israeli life, from the military to the judiciary. It was shocking and eye-opening. This wasn’t the evil Zionist Israel that I had been told about.

Perhaps there is a future for Israel/Palestine after all.

via Muslim, Zionist and proud – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews.

WPR Article | Sudan May Become Hot Spot for Iran-Israel Tensions

Catherine Cheney refers to a suspected Israeli airstrike on a munitions factory in Khartoum, Sudan. She quotes Katherine Zimmerman from the American Enterprise Institute:

“Sudan has served as Iran’s toehold on the African continent and has provided sanctuary to Iranian proxy groups, as well as al-Qaida operatives, and serves as a key conduit for Iran’s arms smuggling network supporting Hamas in Gaza…..”

If Israel did in fact conduct the reported airstrike in Khartoum, [Zimmerman] said, it could be an early indicator of escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran….

via WPR Article | Sudan May Become Hot Spot for Iran-Israel Tensions.