Fusion’s Kevin Lane observes that share-weighted earnings for the S&P 500 are “very close to tilting back into the negative zone”.
….With a bit more than half the companies reporting, S&P 500 earnings YoY (on a share-weighted basis) are only up 3.3 %.
via S&P 500 Index with Share Weighted Earnings Average | The Big Picture.
Good observation from Barry Ritholz about window dressing:
I was trying to figure out why the NYSE would open when not at full operating capacity……… Mutual funds are closing out their year on October 31st. I suspect they are desperate to get one last positive mark on the books before the new year begins.
Observation made by Philip Lowe, RBA Deputy Governor:
Since mid 2008, four of the world’s major central banks – the Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England – have all expanded their balance sheets very significantly, and further increases have been announced in a couple of cases. In total, the assets of these four central banks have already increased by the equivalent of around $US5 trillion, or around 15 per cent of the combined GDP of the relevant economies. We have not seen this type of planned simultaneous very large expansion of central bank balance sheets before. So in that sense, it is very unusual, and its implications are not yet fully understood……
The power of nature.
[gigya src=’http://www.reuters.com/resources_v2/flash/video_embed.swf?videoId=238739605&edition=BETAUS’ type=’application/x-shockwave-flash’ allowfullscreen=’true’ allowScriptAccess=’always’ width=’460′ height=’259′ wmode=’transparent’]
Gabriel Burin writes that the U.S. savings rate sank last month to its lowest since November.
“Households were only able to boost consumption in the third quarter by dipping into their savings,” said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, after the Commerce Department release. “Faced with the prospect of major tax hikes in the New Year, however, they will soon become more cautious”……..
Wall Street Journal opinion on the impact of QE3 on Asia:
If Asia stays true to form, the world is in for a bout of foreign-exchange interventions — some coordinated, some not — in a quest for stability. Yet these interventions will only encourage greater speculative flows, as some investors start betting on the next policy move. This would be America’s problem, too, given the growing number of American businesses trading with Asia that will grapple with a chaotic exchange-rate system…….
via Review & Outlook: Here Comes the Dollar Wave Again – WSJ.com.
This extract is from a 2011 opinion I wrote titled Has democracy failed us or have we failed it?
Elections are an expensive business and no candidate is likely to achieve re-election without financial backers, making them especially vulnerable to outside influence. The finance industry alone made $63 million in campaign contributions to Federal Candidates during the 2010 electoral cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. That will buy you a lot of influence on the Hill, but is merely the tip of the iceberg. Interest groups spent $3.5 billion in that year on lobbying Congress and federal agencies ($473 million from the finance sector). While that money does not flow directly to candidates it acts as an enticing career path/retirement plan for both Representatives and senior staffers.
The revolving door between Capitol Hill and the big lobbying firms parachutes former elected officials and staffers into jobs as lobbyists, consultants and strategists — while infiltrating their best and brightest into positions within government; a constant exchange of power, influence and money. More than 75 percent of the 363 former senators or representatives end up employed by lobbying firms, either as lobbyists or advisors.
Revolving doors continue to plague Washington and financial market regulators. Enforcing lengthy “restraint of trade” periods between the two roles would restrict this. Preventing politicians from joining lobbying firms for two to three years — and financial regulators from joining Wall Street for a similar period — would reduce the risk of “captive regulators”.
The TSX Composite Index is consolidating between 12100 and 12800. Another 13-week Twiggs Money Flow trough above zero would signal a primary up-trend. Breakout above 12500 would strengthen the signal, while follow-through above 12800 would confirm.
* Target calculation: 12750 + ( 12750 – 11200 ) = 14300
The S&P 500 continues to test support at 1400. Bearish divergence on 63-day Twiggs Momentum warns that a top may be forming. Breach of support would strengthen the signal. The market is currently enjoying the “honeymoon” period in the lead up to the election. Reality is likely to bite after the results are in, as the government deals with some tough choices — like how to create jobs while reducing the budget deficit.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is similarly testing support at 13000 on the weekly chart. Breach of support — and the primary trendline — would warn that a top is forming. A 13-week Twiggs Money Flow reversal below zero would indicate rising selling pressure, while a trough above the line would suggest another primary advance. Recovery above 13650 is unlikely at present but would confirm an advance.
* Target calculation: 13000 + ( 13000 – 12000 ) = 14000
With the ideological shift, supported by the intellectual acceptance of Keynes’s General Theory, politicians found themselves with an excuse to do what most had always wanted to do — take more money from the general public and transfer it to favored groups (or voting blocs). The benefits are invariably less than the costs, but they are visible, readily appreciated, and easily credited to politicians. Predictably, beginning in the 1930s federal spending began increasing as a share of GDP. It was about 4 percent of GDP in 1930, increased during the Great Depression and spiked to a historical high of about 47 percent during World War II. The federal government share of GDP then dropped to about 13 percent in 1948, reached a bumpy plateau in the early 1960s at slightly below to slightly above 20 percent that lasted for over 40 years, and then escalated rapidly in late 2008 to an estimated 25 percent in 2011……
The Keynesian Path to Fiscal Irresponsibility | Dwight R. Lee (pdf).
