nominal GDP growth Archives - the patient investor

December 1, 2023

10-Year Treasury yields rally, Dollar surges

Ten-year Treasury yields tested support at 4.25% yesterday before rallying to 4.35%. Breakout above 4.35% would suggest a stronger move to test 4.50%.

10-Year Treasury Yield

The Dollar index surged in response and is likely to test resistance at 103.

Dollar Index

Gold weakened slightly, to $2040 per ounce.

Spot Gold

Long-term View

Jim Bianco thinks we are headed for 5.5% yield on 10-Year Treasuries by mid-2024. He says that the 10-year yield should match nominal GDP growth:

No recession next year
Inflation bottoms around 3%
Real growth of 2% to 3%
That gives nominal growth of 5.0% to 6.0%.

Growth

Nominal GDP growth ticked up to 6.3% for the 12 months to September, but the long-term trend is downward.

Nominal GDP Growth

Growth in Aggregate weekly hours worked declined to 1.1% for the 12 months to October — a good indicator of real growth.

Estimated Aggregate Non-Farm Weekly Hours Worked

Continued unemployment claims are climbing, suggesting that (real) growth will slow further in the months ahead.

Continued Claims

Inflation

The other component of nominal GDP growth is inflation, where five-year consumer expectations (from the University of Michigan survey) have climbed to above 3.0%.

University of Michigan Inflation Expectations 5-Year

However, core PCE inflation (orange) and trimmed mean PCE (red) are both trending lower.

Core PCE & Trimmed Mean PCE Inflation

Services PCE inflation (brown below) is also trending lower but likely to prove more difficult to subdue.

PCE Services Inflation

Real Interest Rate

Jim Bianco suggests that nominal GDP growth will fall to between 5.0% and 6.0% in 2024 — a good approximate of return on new investment — while the 10-year yield will rise to a similar level. This represents a neutral rate of interest that is unlikely to fuel further inflation.

10-Year Treasury Yield & Nominal GDP Growth

Inflation builds when the 10-year yield exceeds GDP growth by a wide margin. The long-term chart below shows how PCE inflation (red) climbs when 10-year Treasury yields minus GDP growth (purple) fall near -5.0%. Inflation also falls sharply when the purple line rises above 5.0%, normally during a recession when GDP growth is negative.

10-Year Treasury Yield minus Nominal GDP Growth & PCE Inflation

Conclusion

Jim Bianco’s premise of 10-year yields at 5.5% is based on the expectation that the Fed will maintain neutral real interest rates in order to tame inflation. Whether the Fed will be able to achieve this is questionable.

Japan and China have stopped investing in Treasuries, commercial banks are net sellers, and the private sector does not have the capacity to absorb growing Treasury issuance to fund federal deficits. That leaves the Fed as buyer of last resort.

The Fed may be forced to intervene in the Treasury market, keeping a lid on long-term yields while expanding the money supply. The likely result will be higher inflation and a weaker Dollar, both of which are bullish for Gold.

Acknowledgements

CNBC/Jim Bianco: 10-Year Treasury yield to rebound to 5.5%

November 11, 2012

Taking the leverage out of economic growth | Reuters

Edward Hadas points out that long-term credit growth has exceeded growth in nominal GDP (real GDP plus inflation) in the US and Europe for some time. Not only does this fuel a credit bubble but it leads to a build up of inflationary pressure within the economy. If not evident in consumer prices it is likely to emerge as an asset bubble.

For the last two decades, accelerating credit has been closely correlated with the change in GDP – both in the United States and the euro zone. GDP growth tended to speed up shortly after the rate of credit growth increased, and slowed down after credit growth started to decrease.

This correlation implies there is an equilibrium rate of credit growth – the rate that corresponds to the long-term pace of nominal GDP growth. Though the pace of credit growth can vary from year to year, over time private debt and nominal GDP have to expand at the same rate for overall leverage to stay constant. That’s not what happened in the past two decades. Since 1990, Deutsche found a significant gap between credit and GDP growth in the United States and the euro zone.

In both, the neutral rate of credit growth – the rate associated with the economy’s long-term growth rate – was 7 percent. Those long-term nominal GDP growth rates were lower: 4.8 percent in the United States and 4 percent in the euro zone. In a single year, the difference of 2-3 percentage points doesn’t have much effect. Over a generation, though, it leads to a massive increase in the ratio of private debt to GDP.

The gap between growth in Domestic Debt and Nominal GDP widened in 2004/5 during the height of the property bubble and has narrowed to near zero since 2010.
Domestic Debt Growth Compared to GDP Growth
Hopefully the Fed have learned their lesson and maintain this course in future.

via Analysis & Opinion | Reuters.

November 6, 2012

Is the Fed finally listening to Scott Sumner?

Brendan Greely writes of Scott Sumner.

Sumner who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, made a suggestion in the late 1980s to the New York Federal Reserve. He proposed that the Fed set a target for nominal GDP—real growth in GDP plus the rate of inflation. He felt that this would induce the correct level of business investment better than targeting either inflation or growth in real GDP by themselves. The response at the New York Fed, says Sumner, was, “Thanks, but no thanks.”

Targeting nominal GDP (NGDP) growth eliminates reliance on inexact measures of inflation which can mis-direct monetary policy. The advantage is that NGDP can be accurately measured. NGDP targeting would help to eliminate bubbles in the long term by restricting debt growth. And in the short-term would encourage the Fed to expand money supply in response to private sector deleveraging, avoiding deflationary pressure.

The announcement by the Fed’s rate-setting committee in mid-September doesn’t contain any mention of targeting nominal GDP. But its open-ended nature and clear goals—pump up the money supply until hiring rises strongly—resembles Sumner’s nominal GDP model, which would have a central bank do all in its power to achieve an agreed-upon nominal rate of growth.

It has taken Sumner almost 3 decades, but in the end he is likely to get there.

via The Blog That Got Bernanke to Go Big – Businessweek.

June 12, 2012

Australia: GDP growth is not real

Mark Graph: Table 5 of the national accounts includes the implicit price deflators (IPD) for each term in the expenditure equation for GDP….the big deflationary item was exports….

So we get to the heart of the anomaly: largely because we exported a touch less in volume terms (in Q1 2012 compared with Q4 2011) but at significantly reduced prices, this contributed significantly to an outcome where real GDP grew significantly while nominal GDP stagnated.

via Understanding our price deflationary boom | Mark Graph.

Comment:~ So real GDP growth is not really real. The major difference between nominal GDP growth (1.2% annualized) and real GDP growth (a far more impressive 5.2% annualized) is a fall in the price of exports!