Tag: nominal GDP growth

Posted on

China sizzle turns to fizzle

China’s announcement of economic stimulus and hints at an even larger “bazooka” ahead caused a sizzling rally on the Shanghai exchange, with the CSI 300 leaping 20% in the last week of September.

Shanghai Shenzhen CSI 300 Index

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index displays an even steeper rally.

Hang Seng Index

However, a failure to follow through this week with sufficient detail of the stimulus package caused the rally to fizzle, with a sharp correction on both indices. Today, the Hang Seng is testing support at 20500.

China Stimulus

Crude Oil

Brent crude reversed sharply as prospects faded for a demand recovery in China.

Brent Crude

Treasury Markets

Ten-year Treasury yields stalled and will likely re-test new support at 4.0%.

10-Year Treasury Yield

According to the theory of interest developed by Swedish economist Knut Wicksell, the equilibrium or natural rate of interest—at which inflationary and deflationary pressures are in balance—is when the cost of borrowing is higher than the average return on new investment. This means that the 10-year Treasury yield–the risk-free rate–should be roughly equal to nominal GDP growth, approximating the return on new investment. The chart below shows that the 10-year Treasury yield, at 4.0%, is significantly lower than nominal GDP growth of 5.7% for the 12 months ended in Q2.

Wicksell Analysis: Nominal GDP Growth & 10-Year Treasury Yield

With the economy showing little sign of slowing, the likely outcome is either higher long-term interest rates or a build-up of long-term inflationary pressure.

Stocks

The S&P 500 gained almost 1.0% on Tuesday, with a shallow retracement and rising Trend Index troughs signaling buying pressure.

S&P 500

Nvidia led the advance of mega-cap stocks, breaking above its August high, while all seven advanced yesterday.

Top 7 Technology Stocks

The equal-weighted index lagged as large caps failed to match mega-cap gains.

S&P 500 Equal-Weighted Index

Financial Markets

Bitcoin continues to test the upper border of its trend channel. A breakout would be a bullish sign for financial market liquidity.

Bitcoin (BTC)

Dollar & Gold

The Dollar Index is expected to retrace to test new support at 102. Respect would confirm an advance to 104.

Dollar Index

Gold is headed for a test of support at $2,600 per ounce, but respect will likely confirm a re-test of $2,700.

Spot Gold

Silver is testing support at $30 per ounce, with respect again likely to signal a re-test of resistance at $32.

Spot Silver

Metals

Copper retreated in response to China’s disappointing stimulus. Expect a correction to test support at $9,250 per tonne.

Copper

Iron ore also reflects disappointment, retreating to $106.30 per tonne.

Iron Ore

Conclusion

A disappointing lack of detail on China’s newly announced stimulus led to a retreat in Chinese stocks and global crude oil, copper, and iron ore.

Ten-year Treasury yields are expected to retrace to test support at 4.0%. While yields are likely to remain low as the Fed cuts interest rates, the long-term equilibrium rate is expected to be higher—between 5% and 6%.

Respect of support at 5650 on the S&P 500 confirms our year-end target of 6000, but the advance is exceedingly narrow and precarious.

Gold is headed testing support at $2,600 per ounce, but respect is likely and would signal a re-test of $2,700.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

S&P 500 storm in a teacup

Markets were spooked by “hawkish” comments in the latest FOMC minutes, where some participants indicated a willingness to tighten policy should such action become appropriate:

Participants discussed maintaining the current restrictive policy stance for longer should inflation not show signs of moving sustainably toward 2 percent or reducing policy restraint in the event of an unexpected weakening in labor market conditions. Various participants mentioned a willingness to tighten policy further should risks to inflation materialize in a way that such an action became appropriate. ~ Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee: April 30–May 1, 2024

This is nothing new: all FOMC members should be prepared to hike rates if inflation spikes to the point where tighter policy is appropriate. What seems to have spooked markets is the fact that it was considered appropriate to discuss this out in the open.

10-year Treasury yields rallied to test 4.5%, ending the series of declining Trend Index peaks. Breakout above 4.5% would signal another test of 4.7% but breach of support remains likely and would signal a decline to test support between 4.0% and 4.1%.

10-year Treasury Yield

The large engulfing candle on the S&P 500 is a bearish sign. Expect a test of support at 5200 but respect is likely and would confirm our target of 5500.

S&P 500

The S&P 500 Equal-Weighted Index ($IQX) retreated sharply and is likely to test support at 6600.

S&P 500 Equal-Weighted Index ($IQX)

Financial Markets

Commercial bank reserves at the Fed climbed to $3.39 trillion on May 22, continuing the recovery of financial market liquidity after the sharp fall during April tax payment season.

Commercial Bank Reserves at the Fed

The inverted Chicago Fed Financial Conditions Index (black below) continues to climb, indicating easier monetary policy. The S&P 500 (blue) is expected to follow the FCI upwards.

S&P 500 Index & Chicago Fed Financial Conditions Index (inverted scale)

Wicksell Analysis

The chart below is based on the theory of interest and money published by Swedish economist Knut Wicksell in 1898. Monetary policy is restrictive when long-term interest rates are higher than nominal GDP growth (the marginal return on new investment) and stimulatory when LT rates are below nominal GDP growth.

We plot nominal GDP (silver) against 10-year Treasury yields (purple) below. Stimulatory monetary policy is evident in the 1960s and ’70s — with GDP growth (silver) above long-term rates (purple) — boosting growth and inflation. This followed by restrictive policies in the 1980s and ’90s before long-term rates were again suppressed to stimulate the economy in the last two decades.

10-year Treasury Yield & Nominal GDP Growth

Nominal GDP grew at an annualized rate of 5.5% in Q1 of 2024, while the 10-year yield is below 4.5%, indicating that monetary policy remains stimulatory. Further growth and inflation are likely.

Crude Oil

The counter-argument to the monetarist view is that crude oil prices are falling and likely to ease inflationary pressures in the economy.

Nymex light crude broke support at $78 per barrel, indicating a decline to test long-term support (red) at $68.

Nymex WTI Light Crude

Energy prices were the primary cause of the spike in CPI in 2021 and its subsequent fall in 2022-23.

Conclusion

Crude prices are likely to fall, easing inflationary pressures and leading to lower long-term interest rates.

We expect the Fed and US Treasury to maintain easy monetary conditions until after the November elections.

The current bull market in stocks is likely to continue until end of the year.

Ceteris paribus

The Latin phrase ceteris paribus means “all else being equal.”

If Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping attempt to influence US elections by disrupting the global economy — through cyberattacks, damage to undersea communication cables, infrastructure, or transport bottlenecks — then all bets are off and we could be in for a wild ride.

Acknowledgements



Posted on

10-Year Treasury yields rally, Dollar surges

Ten-year Treasury yields tested support at 4.25% yesterday before rallying to 4.35%. Breakout above 4.35% would suggest a stronger move to test 4.50%.

10-Year Treasury Yield

The Dollar index surged in response and is likely to test resistance at 103.

Dollar Index

Gold weakened slightly, to $2040 per ounce.

Spot Gold

Long-term View

Jim Bianco thinks we are headed for 5.5% yield on 10-Year Treasuries by mid-2024. He says that the 10-year yield should match nominal GDP growth:

  • No recession next year
  • Inflation bottoms around 3%
  • Real growth of 2% to 3%
  • That gives nominal growth of 5.0% to 6.0%.

Growth

Nominal GDP growth ticked up to 6.3% for the 12 months to September, but the long-term trend is downward.

Nominal GDP Growth

Growth in Aggregate weekly hours worked declined to 1.1% for the 12 months to October — a good indicator of real growth.

Estimated Aggregate Non-Farm Weekly Hours Worked

Continued unemployment claims are climbing, suggesting that (real) growth will slow further in the months ahead.

Continued Claims

Inflation

The other component of nominal GDP growth is inflation, where five-year consumer expectations (from the University of Michigan survey) have climbed to above 3.0%.

University of Michigan Inflation Expectations 5-Year

However, core PCE inflation (orange) and trimmed mean PCE (red) are both trending lower.

Core PCE & Trimmed Mean PCE Inflation

Services PCE inflation (brown below) is also trending lower but likely to prove more difficult to subdue.

PCE Services Inflation

Real Interest Rate

Jim Bianco suggests that nominal GDP growth will fall to between 5.0% and 6.0% in 2024 — a good approximate of return on new investment  — while the 10-year yield will rise to a similar level. This represents a neutral rate of interest  that is unlikely to fuel further inflation.

10-Year Treasury Yield & Nominal GDP Growth

Inflation builds when the 10-year yield exceeds GDP growth by a wide margin. The long-term chart below shows how PCE inflation (red) climbs when 10-year Treasury yields minus GDP growth (purple) fall near -5.0%. Inflation also falls sharply when the purple line rises above 5.0%, normally during a recession when GDP growth is negative.

10-Year Treasury Yield minus Nominal GDP Growth & PCE Inflation

Conclusion

Jim Bianco’s premise of 10-year yields at 5.5% is based on the expectation that the Fed will maintain neutral real interest rates in order to tame inflation. Whether the Fed will be able to achieve this is questionable.

Japan and China have stopped investing in Treasuries, commercial banks are net sellers, and the private sector does not have the capacity to absorb growing Treasury issuance to fund federal deficits. That leaves the Fed as buyer of last resort.

The Fed may be forced to intervene in the Treasury market, keeping a lid on long-term yields while expanding the money supply. The likely result will be higher inflation and a weaker Dollar, both of which are bullish for Gold.

Acknowledgements

  • CNBC/Jim Bianco: 10-Year Treasury yield to rebound to 5.5%
Posted on

Taking the leverage out of economic growth | Reuters

Edward Hadas points out that long-term credit growth has exceeded growth in nominal GDP (real GDP plus inflation) in the US and Europe for some time. Not only does this fuel a credit bubble but it leads to a build up of inflationary pressure within the economy. If not evident in consumer prices it is likely to emerge as an asset bubble.

For the last two decades, accelerating credit has been closely correlated with the change in GDP – both in the United States and the euro zone. GDP growth tended to speed up shortly after the rate of credit growth increased, and slowed down after credit growth started to decrease.

This correlation implies there is an equilibrium rate of credit growth – the rate that corresponds to the long-term pace of nominal GDP growth. Though the pace of credit growth can vary from year to year, over time private debt and nominal GDP have to expand at the same rate for overall leverage to stay constant. That’s not what happened in the past two decades. Since 1990, Deutsche found a significant gap between credit and GDP growth in the United States and the euro zone.

In both, the neutral rate of credit growth – the rate associated with the economy’s long-term growth rate – was 7 percent. Those long-term nominal GDP growth rates were lower: 4.8 percent in the United States and 4 percent in the euro zone. In a single year, the difference of 2-3 percentage points doesn’t have much effect. Over a generation, though, it leads to a massive increase in the ratio of private debt to GDP.

The gap between growth in Domestic Debt and Nominal GDP widened in 2004/5 during the height of the property bubble and has narrowed to near zero since 2010.
Domestic Debt Growth Compared to GDP Growth
Hopefully the Fed have learned their lesson and maintain this course in future.

via Analysis & Opinion | Reuters.

Posted on

Is the Fed finally listening to Scott Sumner?

Brendan Greely writes of Scott Sumner.

Sumner who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago, made a suggestion in the late 1980s to the New York Federal Reserve. He proposed that the Fed set a target for nominal GDP—real growth in GDP plus the rate of inflation. He felt that this would induce the correct level of business investment better than targeting either inflation or growth in real GDP by themselves. The response at the New York Fed, says Sumner, was, “Thanks, but no thanks.”

Targeting nominal GDP (NGDP) growth eliminates reliance on inexact measures of inflation which can mis-direct monetary policy. The advantage is that NGDP can be accurately measured. NGDP targeting would help to eliminate bubbles in the long term by restricting debt growth. And in the short-term would encourage the Fed to expand money supply in response to private sector deleveraging, avoiding deflationary pressure.

The announcement by the Fed’s rate-setting committee in mid-September doesn’t contain any mention of targeting nominal GDP. But its open-ended nature and clear goals—pump up the money supply until hiring rises strongly—resembles Sumner’s nominal GDP model, which would have a central bank do all in its power to achieve an agreed-upon nominal rate of growth.

It has taken Sumner almost 3 decades, but in the end he is likely to get there.

via The Blog That Got Bernanke to Go Big – Businessweek.

Posted on

Australia: GDP growth is not real

Mark Graph: Table 5 of the national accounts includes the implicit price deflators (IPD) for each term in the expenditure equation for GDP….the big deflationary item was exports….

So we get to the heart of the anomaly: largely because we exported a touch less in volume terms (in Q1 2012 compared with Q4 2011) but at significantly reduced prices, this contributed significantly to an outcome where real GDP grew significantly while nominal GDP stagnated.

via Understanding our price deflationary boom | Mark Graph.

Comment:~ So real GDP growth is not really real. The major difference between nominal GDP growth (1.2% annualized) and real GDP growth (a far more impressive 5.2% annualized) is a fall in the price of exports!

Powered by WordPress / WordPress Maintenance Service By Website Helper