Ansuya Harjani writes:
“In the fourth quarter, we’re seeing corporate loans decline significantly, very shockingly most of our bankers say less than 20 percent of their lending goes to new loans. Most of its going to debt rollovers or increases, they are not funding expansion. That indicates that this is not a period of strong expansion,” Leland Miller, president at CBB [China Beige Book] told CNBC on Wednesday.
Steven Metz writes on China’s growing air-sea battle capability (or “high-intensity, regional military operations, including anti-access and area denial (A2AD) operations” in defense-analyst-speak):
Military capability is only part of the equation: China also has the motivation to use its growing military power. It has long-standing and unresolved territorial disputes with a number of Asia-Pacific nations. It remains dependent on imported energy and has shown a willingness to flex its muscle to protect access to its sources. And most of all, China seems determined to replace the United States as the dominant power in the Asia-Pacific region. To do this, it must negate U.S. military power and fill the ensuing vacuum with its own.
Read more at WPR Article | Strategic Horizons: U.S. Must Change Its Thinking on Conflict in Asia.
Michael Pettis writes about the latest Australian government White Paper Australia in the Asian Century that projects an average 7% GDP growth rate for China between 2012 and 2025:
This seems to put the Australian government among the most optimistic in the market when it comes to long-term growth expectations for China. I have always assumed that government projections should generally be on the pessimistic side to prepare for unexpected negative shocks (positive shocks can take care of themselves), but apparently not. I am glad to say that my own conversations with Australian government officials lead me to believe that this White Paper may represent the official view of the government, but it does not represent the private views of all Australian government officials…….
Read more at Pettis: Australia should be pessimistic | MacroBusiness.
Jack Rodman, president of Global Distressed Solutions LLC, spent 1999 to 2011 living in Japan and China, packaging and disposing of nonperforming loans and distressed assets. He writes on the problems facing China:
At the end of 1989, Japan’s bubble economy burst and its economic miracle came to an abrupt end. The Nikkei exchange fell from nearly 40,000 to its current 10,000 range. Over the course of 20 years, what appeared to be “unstoppable” economic growth proved to be anything but.
Today, China, in some ways, appears to be closer to following Japan than to sustaining its own economic miracle. China’s Shanghai Index (stocks) has fallen from a high of 7,000 in 2007 to a low of 2,000 for the past few years, and Chinese domestic investors have little confidence in their domestic stock market. The Japanese bubble, and its aftermath, was the result of a series of domestic financial and economic imbalances, many of which China faces today—to varying if not greater degrees….
Read more at China is now heading toward Japan-style economic paralysis if it doesnt change course – Quartz.
Hongmei Zhao and Lucy Hornby report:
Investors rushed to [Hua Xia Bank Co Ltd]’s Jiading branch in a suburb of Shanghai after one of four wealth management products issued by the Zhongding Wealth Investment Center failed to pay out as scheduled on November 26.
via China regulator frets over confidence crisis after investment product fails | Reuters.
Simon Rabinovitch at FT writes:
Shadow banking is flourishing in China, helping to make non-bank institutions as big a source of credit as banks themselves since July – something that has never happened before. Chinese bankers, leading rating agencies and the International Monetary Fund have all warned about risks from the surge in loosely regulated lending, with some even pointing to parallels with developed economies before the global financial crisis. But the Chinese government itself has taken a permissive stance.
Highly regulated banks restricted lending to property developers following concerns over a real estate bubble. But regulators turned a blind eye to unregulated shadow lenders who borrow short — normally no more than 3 months — and lend long. They may believe this will sustain economic growth while protecting banks from risky lending. The thinly capitalized sector, however, is at risk from defaults and a consequent liquidity crisis which could spread to the banking sector.
Divergence between the Shanghai Composite Index and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index is apparent over the last 12 months, with Hong Kong rebounding while Shanghai weakens.
With no major changes in the HKDCNY exchange rate, to me this reflects political and economic instability on the mainland.
Economist Martin Jacques, author of When China Rules the World, sings the praises of China in BBC Point of View.
“Even though China is still a poor developing country, its state, I would argue, is the most competent in the world. Take infrastructure – the importance of which is belatedly now being recognised in the West. Here, China has no peers…….. we are in a new ball game. With the Western economies in a profound mess and with China’s startling rise, the competence of the state can no longer be ignored. Our model is in crisis. Theirs has been delivering the goods.”
Patrick Chovanec has a different assessment:
“China’s economic miracle was result of govt getting out of way and letting people improve their lives, not planning by all-seeing mandarins.”
China is a developing country, with rapid growth fueled by massive infrastructure investment and strong exports. The country faces diminishing returns on infrastructure investment and dwindling exports — not only from an economic slow-down in the West but from rising wages as the country attempts to boost internal consumption as an antidote to the middle-income trap that is already threatening growth in its richer provinces.
China also faces push-back from the West against trade advantages maintained by suppressing their exchange rate through vendor financing — balancing trade inflows on current account with outflows on capital account. Why else would a developing country hold more than $1 trillion of investment in US Treasuries at negative real interest rates?
Jacques claims that the Chinese state enjoys popular support:
“But does the Chinese state, you may well ask, really enjoy legitimacy in the eyes of its people? Take the findings of Tony Saich at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government……… he found that between 80 and 95% of Chinese people were either relatively or extremely satisfied with central government.”
One of the most powerful tools of an oppressive state is fear: fear of the unknown. Many of their citizens would settle for the status quo rather than risk the turmoil that accompanies change. The same is true of many autocratic regimes. That does not make them a beacon of good government.
Western democracy has many problems but the solution does not lie with increasing the size of the state, nor with greater autocracy. Rather we should examine the most successful Western democracies and learn from them. Switzerland would be a good start. Their well-managed economy enjoys low unemployment, a skilled labor force, and GDP per capita among the highest in the world — 70% above the US. The stable democratic government runs with a strong tradition of consensus among political parties, while citizens hold a collective right of veto over government policy. The country boasts a pristine environment with minimal pollution, a strong human rights record — without oppression of its citizens or minorities — and no territorial disputes with its neighbors.
Which state would you say is the most competent?
Excerpt from a paper by Israel Malkin and Mark M. Spiegel at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. The two believe that China’s richest provinces, Beijing and Shanghai, are experiencing a slow-down in GDP growth (per capita) as they experience a classic middle-income trap, while China’s poorer provinces continue to experience high GDP growth rates.
What evidence exists for middle-income traps in a group of Asian economies that, like China, experienced episodes of rapid growth? We pool data for Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan from 1950 to 2009……. growth of these economies slowed markedly after they reached middle-income status.
Growth rates for these economies are highest just below the $10,000 per-capita-income level and then slow down rapidly as income increases. …..[the] economies grew on average at a 4.8% rate when per capita income reached $17,000, down from a high of 7.2% at the $7,800 level.
Interestingly, the middle-income trap appears to arise in Asia at lower income levels than has been found for broader groups of emerging-market economies. It may be that large Asian countries with relatively low prevailing wages cause the dynamic of the middle-income trap to shift. In Asia, countries may begin to become uncompetitive for certain labor-intensive activities at lower income levels than in other parts of the world……
via FRBSF Economic Letter: Is China Due for a Slowdown? (2012-31, 10/15/2012).
By Stella Dawson
China has lost $3.79 trillion over the past decade in money smuggled out of the country, a massive amount that could weaken its economy and create instability, according to a new report. And the outflow — much of it from corruption, crime or tax evasion — is accelerating. China lost $472 billion in 2011, equivalent to 8.3 percent of its gross domestic product…..
via Dirty money cost China $3.8 trillion 2000-2011: report | Reuters.
