Tag: China

Posted on

Australia Braces for Oil Shortages

Key Points

  • Australia has roughly one month of emergency reserves of petrol, diesel, and gasoline.
  • Iranian attacks will likely lead to supply shortages and steep price hikes in food, commodities, and air travel.

Brent crude futures (May ’26) are testing resistance at $85 per barrel. A breakout will likely offer a short-term target of $90.

Brent Crude

March 5 (Reuters) – More tankers came under attack in Gulf waters on Thursday as the U.S.–Iran war escalated, and Iranian drones entered ​Azerbaijan, threatening to spread the crisis to more oil producers in the region.

A Bahamas-flagged crude oil tanker was targeted by an Iranian ‌remote-controlled boat laden with explosives while anchored near Iraq’s Khor al Zubair port, according to initial assessments. A second tanker at anchor off Kuwait was taking on water and spilling oil after a large explosion on its port side.

Nine vessels have come under attack since the conflict broke out between the U.S., Israel and Iran on Saturday. Iran ​launched a wave of missiles at Israel early on Thursday and also sent drones into Azerbaijan, injuring four people.

….Around 200 ships, including oil and liquefied natural ​gas tankers as well as cargo ships, remained at anchor in open waters off the coast of major Gulf producers, according to Reuters estimates based ​on ship-tracking data from the MarineTraffic platform.

Hundreds of other vessels remained outside the Strait of Hormuz unable to reach ports, shipping data showed.

Australian ​Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Tuesday that Australia has 36 days of petrol, 34 days of diesel, and 32 days of jet fuel in reserve. While Bowen stressed this was the highest level in more than a decade, it’s far below the International Energy Agency recommendation of 90 days.

Compare that to Japan, which is similarly reliant on crude oil from the Middle East and holds emergency oil reserves equivalent to 254 days of consumption. (Reuters)

Ongoing shortages caused by even partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz could lead to fuel rationing in Australia.

Major industries that are heavily reliant on diesel fuel include long-haul road transport, agriculture, and mining. Iron ore operations in the Pilbara region, a major earner of export revenue, alone consume hundreds of millions of liters of diesel each year. (Reuters)

The aviation industry is also vulnerable to fuel shortages. Jet fuel prices in Asia’s ​trading hub Singapore climbed to $225.44 a barrel on Wednesday, a record high.

The spot price of jet kerosene has now gained 140% since the close of $93.45 a barrel on February 27, the day before the United States and Israel launched an aerial bombing campaign against Iran.

The problem is that much of the oil shipped through the Strait of Hormuz is medium-sour crude, a grade prized for its higher yield of middle distillates such as jet kerosene and diesel.

Even if refiners can source alternative crudes from Africa or South America, these grades tend to be lighter and yield more light distillates such as gasoline and naphtha. (Reuters)

The Dow Jones Global Oil & Gas Index has climbed 20% since mid-January.

Dow Jones Global Oil & Gas Index

Conclusion

Japan and China have large emergency stockpiles of crude and LNG and can probably survive several months of supply interruptions.

India, Australia, and Europe do not have that luxury and will likely suffer from a steep spike in prices and possible fuel rationing if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed.

In Australia, we expect food prices to jump if the price of diesel, used in agriculture and long-haul freight, rises. Mining costs will also likely rise due to diesel shortages, driving up the cost of materials.

Global aviation is also vulnerable because of the steep rise in jet fuel prices.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

Iran: What Comes Next?

Key Points

  • Combined air strikes on Iran by the US and Israel make good media coverage but are unlikely to lead to regime change.
  • An Iranian strategy that prolongs the conflict while increasing the cost to the US and its allies has the potential to frustrate US ambitions.
  • Rising crude oil prices and increased US deficits will likely fuel a sharp increase in inflation.

President Trump succeeded in diverting media attention from his troubles at home, with attention-grabbing headlines about Operation “Epic Fury” in Iran. But does he have a clear end goal? He claims the Iranians have requested talks, but they deny it. So what happens if the Iranians are unwilling to give Trump his media victory?

Predictions of a “short war” typically underestimate the opponent and the unpredictability of war.

Many things in war are unpredictable, but some are self-evident:

  • Israel does not have the manpower to wage a full-scale war against Iran.
  • The US public does not have the stomach for a large war, and US leaders want to avoid putting “boots on the ground” at all costs.
  • US allies in the Middle East are equipped with modern air defense systems that can protect them from most missile and drone attacks, but they don’t have the stockpiles of weapons to endure a sustained barrage over several months.
  • Oil tankers carry 21 million barrels of crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz every day. Four ships have already been damaged. Closing the Straits would halt the flow of 20% of global oil production, causing a massive supply shortage and spike in oil prices.

Crude Oil Flows Through the Strait of Hormuz

Brent crude prices shot to above $80 per barrel on Monday.

Brent Crude

Robin Brooks compares the current price rise to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022:

Today’s post …. benchmarks the current shock versus Russia’s invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Russia is a massive oil producer and – at the time – markets worried it would get shut out of the global economy. Yesterday’s spike in oil prices was more than three times as big as the rise on Feb. 24, 2022, the day Russia invaded Ukraine. That’s a big shock no matter how you cut it.

Iranian officials say they have closed the Strait of Hormuz. US Central Command says that is not the case. But tanker rates and insurance costs have skyrocketed.

Lloyds List highlights the steep rise in very large crude carrier (VLCC) rates:

BALTIC Exchange indexes for very large crude carriers loading in the Middle East Gulf reached record highs on Monday. Iranian attacks on tankers and insurers’ withdrawal of war risk cover have effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz.

Spot rate strength in the MEG has cascaded through global freight prices, leading to a surge in rates for VLCCs and other tanker segments worldwide.

The Baltic Exchange’s MEG-China TD3C index went parabolic after the outbreak of war, coming in at a record $423,736 per day on Monday, up 94% from Friday.

Crude Oil Tanker Rates

Global Impact

China gets about 45% of its crude oil needs from the Middle East, with 11% from Iran.

Global Oil Trade

  • Russia, as a large oil exporter, would benefit from a spike in crude oil prices. So would Canada and African exporters like Angola.
  • Large oil importers — China, India, Japan, the rest of the Asia-Pacific region, and Europe — would all suffer from a steep rise in crude oil prices.
  • The US is a net oil importer. While less affected than other major importers, the US has experienced steep rises in inflation during past spikes in crude oil prices.

The 1973 Yom Kippur War and the Arab oil embargo caused a massive jump in crude oil prices, with CPI reaching 12.0% (red- RHS). The Iran-Iraq war in 1980 caused an even steeper spike in inflation, with CPI at nearly 15%.

WTI Crude & CPI

During the 1990 Gulf War, CPI rose above 6.0%. However, during the 2003 Iraq War, deflationary forces— from the collapse of the Dotcom bubble and China’s entry into the WTO — helped offset inflationary pressures from higher crude oil prices.

WTI Crude & CPI

Crude oil prices had already spiked in 2021, but Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 lifted annual CPI to 9.0%.

WTI Crude & CPI

US Deficits

The US federal debt is at a precarious 122% of GDP, and budget deficits remain stubbornly high. The US does not have much spare capacity to wage an extensive or protracted war without generating high inflation.

Federal Debt to Nominal GDP (%)

Conclusion

China’s dependence on crude oil imports is its Achilles heel. The country imports 11 million barrels of crude oil per day, and much of that flows through the Strait of Hormuz.

Chinese leaders will be watching the US-Iran conflict with alarm. US control of the Strait of Hormuz would have China at its mercy. China’s blue-water navy is decades away from being able to challenge US naval supremacy in the Indian Ocean. The only effective way for them to intervene in the current conflict would be to supply Iran with advanced weapons that can challenge US naval dominance.

The Iranians have been battered by air strikes before. They know that a full-scale US invasion is unlikely, and that nothing short of that will likely remove them from power. Their best strategy is patience. They can afford to wait the Americans out. Increase the cost of the war and frustrate US efforts to achieve a decisive outcome. Another protracted conflict in the Middle East, with sky-high oil prices causing a steep rise in inflation, will soon sour US public opinion and lead to yet another retreat.

A protracted conflict in the Middle East would also increase US fiscal deficits. Inflation will likely rise, fueled by increased government spending and rising crude oil prices. Higher inflation and further increases in government debt would increase term premia on long-dated Treasuries. High long-term interest rates would raise the cost of servicing government debt and further increase the deficit.

Attempts by the Fed to suppress long-term interest rates, through QE or other means, would further fuel inflation.

Our strategy is to remain heavily overweight in gold and defensive stocks with stable income streams, and underweight long-term financial assets and high-multiple growth stocks.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

Supreme Court Setback for Trump

Key Points

  • In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 doesn’t authorize President Donald Trump to impose tariffs.
  • The Yale Budget Lab estimated that households’ average cost burden would fall by about half in 2026, to between $600 and $800, if the Supreme Court ruled against the tariffs.
  • However, Trump administration officials previously said they would use different legal pathways to achieve an outcome similar to the IEEPA tariffs.
  • President Trump signed a proclamation Friday night that will impose a 10% duty on most imports for up to 150 days, as permitted under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
  • Businesses may be able to claim refunds for IEEPA tariffs paid, but are unlikely to pass these on to consumers.

Last year, President Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on US trading partners.

He declared a national emergency, saying an influx of illegal drugs from Canada, Mexico, and China had created a public health crisis, and that large and persistent trade deficits had undermined US manufacturing. His administration used IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports to manage the perceived crises: a 10% baseline tariff on all US trading partners and higher duties on Canada, Mexico, and China.

Chief Justice John Roberts

Chief Justice John Roberts

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the IEEPA doesn’t authorize the president to impose tariffs.

“The Government reads IEEPA to give the President power to unilaterally impose unbounded tariffs and change them at will,” according to the court.

“That view would represent a transformative expansion of the President’s authority over tariff policy,” their opinion argued. “It is also telling that in IEEPA’s half-century of existence, no President has invoked the statute to impose any tariffs, let alone tariffs of this magnitude and scope.”

The Yale Budget Lab estimated that households’ average cost burden would fall by about half in 2026, to between $600 and $800, if the IEEPA tariffs were overturned.

Before the ruling, Trump administration officials had said they would use different legal pathways, if overruled, to achieve roughly the same outcome as the tariffs. (CNBC)

President Trump signed a proclamation Friday night that will impose 10% tariffs on most imports to the United States, to replace the 10% IEEPA baseline tariff rate overturned by the earlier Supreme Court ruling.

The new tariffs take effect Monday and are levied under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose duties of up to 15% for 150 days to address “large and serious” balance-of-payments issues. (CBS News)

Businesses will likely claim refunds for the estimated $175 billion in IEEPA tariffs paid to date, but consumers will not receive any direct benefit. (Reuters)

Treasury Markets

10-year Treasury yields increased on news of the Supreme Court ruling, but remain close to primary support at 4.0%.

10-Year Treasury Yield

Stocks

The S&P 500 rallied on the prospect of reduced tariffs, but will likely reverse on news of Trump’s Friday night proclamation.

S&P 500

Financial Markets

The Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index reached -0.568 on February 13, signaling loose monetary conditions.

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index

However, Bitcoin1 (BTC) remains below 70,000, indicating that financial markets are shedding risk assets.

Bitcoin (BTC)

Inflation

The Fed’s favored measure of underlying inflation, the core PCE index, jumped by 0.355% in December 2025, warning of an upsurge in price pressures.

Core PCE Inflation - Monthly

Annual growth in the core PCE inflation index lifted to 3.0%, and the headline PCE index increased to 2.9%.

PCE & Core PCE

The University of Michigan (UOM) survey of consumers reported a median expected price increase of 3.4% over the next year, with the 3-month average declining to 3.9%.

University of Michigan: 1-Year Inflation Expectations

Consumers

Consumer sentiment from the February UOM survey remains near record lows since the survey commenced in 1960.

University of Michigan: Consumer Sentiment

Participants’ assessment of current economic conditions is also near the lowest ebb in more than 60 years.

University of Michigan: Current Economic Conditions

Economy

Real GDP growth slowed to 0.35% in the fourth quarter, or 1.4% annualized, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Aggregate weekly hours worked grew at a slower 1.0% over the 12 months to January 2026, suggesting that GDP growth will likely slow further.

Real GDP & Growth in Total Hours Worked

Dollar & Gold

The US Dollar Index met resistance at 98 after news of the Supreme Court ruling, and we expect the downtrend to continue.

Dollar Index

Gold rallied to above $5,100 per ounce, signaling another test of resistance at $5,500.

Spot Gold

Conclusion

The Supreme Court ruling against President Trump’s tariffs checks his expansive use of emergency powers in pursuit of his economic agenda. The ruling also increases the economic uncertainty that has bedeviled Trump’s economic policy, making it difficult for corporations to make long-term investment decisions.

Declining real GDP growth in the fourth quarter highlights that the US economy is heavily reliant on massive capital investment in AI data centers to keep the country out of a recession, while the broader economy shudders from one mishap to the next.

Consumer sentiment and perceptions of current economic conditions are near sixty-year lows, again reflecting the narrow economic recovery, which has failed to benefit most Americans despite low unemployment. Republicans are going to find it difficult to hold a majority in Congress after the November midterm elections, delivering a further setback to Trump’s economic agenda.

The Supreme Court decision, led by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, is a sign that conservatives will increasingly resist Trump’s disregard for the checks and balances built into the Constitution. We have likely passed “peak Trump” on the economic front, though he will likely try to stay in the spotlight with his geopolitical agenda.

We maintain our overweight position in gold and defensive stocks with stable cash flows, while avoiding high-multiple technology stocks and long-term financial instruments.

Acknowledgments

Notes

  1. Cryptocurrencies are the highest-risk asset class, and we analyze Bitcoin (BTC) solely to identify risk sentiment in financial markets. Our analysis is not a recommendation to buy or sell BTC, nor is it a commentary on the merits of cryptocurrency.
Posted on

China’s NBS Manufacturing PMI for November

China’s NBS Manufacturing PMI increased to 49.2 for the month of November, up from 49.0 in October. The index indicates that the manufacturing sector has been contracting for the past 8 months, but only values below 49.0 are considered a risk-off signal.

China: NBS Manufacturing PMI

Conclusion

The NBS Manufacturing PMI for China continues to signal risk-on, and the Australian bull-bear indicator is unchanged.

Acknowledgements

Posted on

Rising recession risk threatens bond market

Summary

  • Trade talks with China have stalled
  • President Trump announces steel and aluminum tariffs will increase from 25% to 50%
  • Input costs for US manufacturers are expected to soar
  • Spending is expected to slow after the introduction of tariffs in April
  • The economic outlook is clouded with uncertainty, and the risk of a recession is rising

President Trump accused China of “totally violating its agreement” with the United States last week. (Reuters)

The Geneva agreement concluded between Treasury Secretary Bessent and his Chinese counterpart called for a 90-day pause in increased tariffs and for China to lift restrictions on exports of critical materials such as rare earths needed for semiconductor, electronics, and defense applications.

According to a US trade representative, the Chinese are moving slowly on granting export licenses for critical materials. The automobile industry is already warning that shortages of rare earth magnets could halt production in a matter of weeks.

The Chinese slow-walking of export licenses appears to be retaliation for the US last week imposing license requirements, and revoking some licenses, for exports of design software and chemicals for semiconductors, butane and ethane, machine tools, and aviation equipment.

In another blow to the auto industry, President Trump announced that he will increase tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from 25% to 50%. Steelmakers are expected to benefit from higher domestic prices, boosting output, but automobile manufacturing, heavy engineering, and construction industries will likely bear the costs.

Steel exports from Canada and Mexico will be most affected, but South Korea, Germany, and Brazil are also expected to suffer. The EU has threatened retaliatory measures if the issue cannot be resolved.

Aluminum imports are likely to continue despite the increased tariffs. Bauxite and electricity are the two primary input costs of smelters, and domestic US smelters will struggle to match the low-cost hydroelectric power of global competitors.

Financial Markets

The S&P 500 is testing the band of resistance at 6000, but short weekly candles indicate hesitancy.

S&P 500

Strong liquidity supports financial markets, with the Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index falling to -0.606, signaling easy monetary conditions.

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index

10-year Treasury yields are testing support between 4.4% and 4.5%, but the weak dollar warns of capital outflows that are expected to send long-term yields higher.

10-Year Treasury Yield

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says, “You are going to see a crack in the bond market. It is going to happen…. I’m telling you it’s going to happen….”

Economy

Former Fed economist Dr Lacy Hunt warns that the US economy is slowing, with a higher than 50% probability of recession. He warns that the economy is far weaker than generally understood, and what markets are not considering is that spending brought forward to front-run tariffs is likely to cause a sharp drop in spending in the next few months.

A recession would also cause the fiscal deficit to increase sharply, by at least another 2.0% of GDP, adding further stress on the bond market.

The ISM manufacturing PMI declined to 48.5% in May, indicating a long-term contraction.

ISM Manufacturing PMI

Manufacturing inventories surged in March as manufacturers brought forward purchases to get ahead of April’s tariff increases.

ISM Manufacturing Inventories

Imports also surged in the first quarter, followed by a steep plunge in May.

ISM Manufacturing Imports

Exports are contracting at a similar rate.

ISM Manufacturing Exports

Prices is the only sub-index that has surged, warning of steeply rising input costs.

ISM Manufacturing Prices

Crude Oil

OPEC+ decided to increase production targets by 411.000 barrels per day in July, which is equal to the increases in May and June.

However, in a sign of shrinking global trade, China’s seaborne imports declined by more than a million barrels per day in May. Kpler estimates imports at 9.43 mbpd compared to 10.46 mbpd in April and 10.45 mbpd in March. (Reuters)

Brent crude is likely to re-test support at $60 per barrel, and breach would offer a target of $50.

Brent Crude

Dollar & Gold

Capital outflows are weakening the dollar. The US Dollar Index has broken support at 100, and follow-through below 98 would confirm another decline with a target of 90.

Dollar Index

Gold rallied to test the band of resistance at $3,400 per ounce. A breakout above $3,500 would strengthen our target of $4,000 by the end of 2025.

Spot Gold

Conclusion

Due to high levels of uncertainty, consumers and corporations are expected to defer capital expenditures in the months ahead. The drop in spending is likely to be accelerated by the build-up in inventories and the bringing forward of expenditures to get ahead of tariff increases in April.

Contracting imports and exports in the manufacturing sector warn that the economy will slow. Falling crude oil imports in China paint a similar outlook, suggesting a global recession.

A recession would increase the deficit and further stress the bond market, which is already concerned about spiraling debt levels.

A falling dollar and rising gold price warn of capital outflows from US financial markets. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon tells us to prepare for a coming crack in the bond market. That would mean higher long-term yields and sharply lower stock prices, likely boosting demand for gold even higher.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

How tariffs could break America

“To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff….it’s my favorite word.” ~ Donald Trump, October 2024

Americans’ experience with tariffs is mixed. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s prompted retaliatory tariffs and trade barriers from trading partners, causing a collapse in international trade that badly hurt US manufacturers. The tariffs were misguided because, at the time, the US ran large trade surpluses, which made it vulnerable to retaliation.

Now the US runs large trade deficits, of between $60 and $100 billion per month, which makes it far more difficult for trading partners to retaliate effectively.

US Monthly Trade Deficit (billions)

Stephen Miran, Trump’s nominee for chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, wrote a 40-page “job application” in October. In it, he praises Trump’s past performance with tariffs in 2018 and proposes restructuring the global trade system. However, misguided use of tariffs could damage the US.

Miran proposes implementing import tariffs, mainly targeting those trade partners that run large trade surpluses with the US, notably China. China’s global trade surplus has expanded to more than $100 billion per month, and a large percentage of this trade is with the US.

China: Monthly Trade Surplus

Import Tariffs

A tariff on imports will likely provoke two main responses: retaliatory trade barriers and a stronger Dollar.

Retaliation

We can expect trading partners to erect trade barriers to target politically sensitive industries in the US. In the 1930s, Europe responded with import restrictions on US automobiles, hurting the Ford Motor Company. Nowadays, China will likely restrict exports of critical materials in markets it dominates—like germanium, gallium, and rare earth elements—targeting semiconductors, electric batteries, and defense technologies. Another Chinese favorite is tariffs on agricultural imports like soybeans, targeting mid-west farmers. Electric vehicle imports are another obvious target, particularly Tesla because of Elon Musk’s proximity to the president.

Tesla (TSLA) has fallen 39% from its high in December.

Tesla (TSLA)

The Dollar

The Dollar will likely strengthen if trading partners do not retaliate against increased tariffs. A stronger Dollar will tend to offset the cost of the tariff to consumers, as in 2018-2019, when the Yuan weakened markedly against the Dollar.

Yuan per US Dollar

The result was that the US current account showed little benefit from the 2018-2019 tariffs.

US Current Account Deficit

To the extent that the exchange rate adjusts to absorb the effect of the tariff–so that the Dollar price of the imported goods does not change–the tariff is effectively a tax on the foreign exporter. However, the cost incidence is not that straightforward.

Cost Incidence

A central argument for tariffs is that the exporter, not the US consumer, bears the cost. However, it’s not that simple.

Miran cites a 2019 NBER paper by Cavallo, Gopinath, Neiman and Tang which found that the dollar import price increased by the amount of 2018-2019 tariffs, and that appreciation of the Dollar did little to offset this. “The move in the currency didn’t pass through into import prices.”

Pass Through of Tariffs to Import Prices

While Miran is correct that there may be longer-term adjustments, the study makes an important distinction. US producers responding to retaliatory tariffs on their exports were forced to bear a large percentage of the cost. Export prices for affected goods (red below) fell sharply relative to exports without tariffs (blue).

Affect of Retaliatory Tariffs on Export Prices

The difference is that US agricultural exports were a non-differentiated product with ready substitutes. China imposed a tariff on US soybean imports, comfortable in the knowledge that importers would increase orders from alternative suppliers like Brazil. So US farmers were forced to cut prices to compete.

The tariff cost for differentiated products, with no ready substitutes, such as high-level semiconductors and equipment, is far more likely to be borne by the customer.

Weakening the Dollar

Miran recognizes that the strong Dollar will harm exports and speculates that strategies could be employed to weaken the Dollar. However, that would increase the cost incidence on the consumer.

Efforts to weaken the Dollar would likely undermine its role as the global reserve currency and accelerate the migration of foreign central bank reserves to gold bullion as a reserve asset.

There are three likely negative consequences. First, a falling dollar would reduce foreign support for US Treasury markets, driving up long-term interest rates that would hurt financial markets and the economy.

Second, discouraging direct foreign investment in US financial markets—by tearing up tax treaties, for example —would cause an outflow from mega-cap technology stocks, Treasuries, and other key foreign investment targets. The result could crash financial markets and the economy.

Third, printing Dollars to buy assets in a sovereign wealth fund or other strategies that involve increased fiscal spending are likely to fuel an increase in inflation.

Weakening the Dollar may also involve lowering US interest rates vis-a-vis trading partners. However, this assumes that foreign central banks will not respond in kind and that the Fed will cooperate, ignoring the inflation risk.

Re-industrialization

The aim of tariffs is to create a favorable environment for establishing new industry. However, there are many barriers other than the price of competitive imports.

First, you need a skilled workforce with the education and training required to run new factories. Companies establishing semiconductor foundries in the US, for example, under President Joe Biden’s CHIPS and Science Act, have encountered skills shortages. (The Economist)

Then you need infrastructure. ALCOA, the largest aluminum producer in the US, relocated smelters to Canada because of advantageous electricity costs. CEO Bill Oplinger says the increased tariffs would not entice it to return. (Reuters)

You also need to secure the key materials required to support new industries, whether bauxite to supply aluminum smelters, copper for EVs and turbines, or critical materials–like gallium, germanium, and rare earth elements– for high-tech industry. China has spent the last two decades tying up supply contracts, and the US is a late arrival to the party.

Conclusion

Tariffs on imports will likely provoke retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, which could harm international trade and exact a cost on both economies. The US is in a strong position because of its large trade deficit; so it can inflict greater damage on its competitor. However, we should not ignore other forms of retaliation like restricting access to critical materials, where there are no ready substitutes, and erecting other trade barriers that impose a cost on US exporters.

Under no circumstances should tariffs be placed on imports of goods where there is no readily-available substitute. The US consumer will bear the cost.

The Dollar will also likely strengthen in response to US tariffs on imports, which could partially offset the cost of the tariff to consumers. However, a strong Dollar will reduce the competitiveness of US manufacturers in export markets. Miran speculates that the US may be able to offset this by policies to weaken the Dollar. But you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Efforts to weaken the Dollar could also undermine its role as the global reserve currency, crash financial markets and the economy, or cause a resurgence of inflation. If not all three.

A strategy to re-industrialize the US economy requires a holistic approach. First, ensure that you build up the necessary skills and resources through a comprehensive education and infrastructure program and secure supplies of key materials. Then, progress to the next stage of establishing the groundwork for a new global trade and currency accord. Ignoring the first stage is like putting the cart before the horse.

An impatient president has surrounded himself with a team unlikely to oppose him. Developing a program to re-industrialize the economy will require skill, patience, and meticulous planning. It could take the better part of a decade, but that seems unlikely to happen.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

Threat of a US-China trade war boosts gold

Donald Trump’s reversal on tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports caused a sharp rebound in the S&P 500. However, tariffs on Chinese imports remain in place and have elicited a response from the Middle Kingdom.

Stocks

The S&P 500 retraced to test resistance at 6000. Respect would confirm a correction.

S&P 500

Six of seven mega-cap technology stocks showed losses, with only Meta Platforms (META) recording an up-day.

Top 7 Technology Stocks

Financial Markets

Financial market conditions remain stimulative, with Moody’s Baa corporate bond spread narrowing to 1.45%, the lowest level since 1997. This indicates the ready availability of credit.

Moody's Baa Corporate Bond Spreads

Treasury Markets

Ten-year Treasury yields continue to test support at 4.5%. Respect will likely confirm an advance to test resistance at 5.0%.

10-Year Treasury Yield

US Economy

ISM Manufacturing PMI improved to 50.9%, the highest level in 27 months, indicating a recovery in the sector.

ISM Manufacturing PMI

New orders jumped to 55.1%, indicating expansion.

ISM Manufacturing New Orders

However, the Prices sub-index also increased, indicating inflationary pressures.

ISM Manufacturing Prices

Leading industry sectors also warn of a slowing economy. Airfreight and logistics (blue) plunged by more than 10% and would flag a recession ahead if joined by a decline in either containers and packaging (orange) or road and rail (green).

Leading Industry Sectors

China Tariffs

China has slapped tariffs on US imports in a swift response to Donald Trump’s duties on Chinese goods, renewing a trade war between the world’s top two economies as America’s President seeks to punish Beijing for not halting the flow of illicit drugs.

Mr Trump’s additional 10% tariff across all Chinese imports into the US came into effect at 12.01am Eastern Time on Tuesday (5.01am GMT).

Within minutes, China’s Finance Ministry said it would impose levies of 15% for US coal and Liquid Natural Gas and 10% for crude oil, farm equipment and some cars and trucks. The new tariffs on US exports will start on February 10, the ministry said.

China also said it was starting an anti-monopoly investigation in Alphabet Inc’s Google, while including both PVH Corp, the holding company for brands including Calvin Klein, and US biotechnology company Illumina on its “unreliable entities list”.

Separately, China’s Commerce Ministry and its Customs Administration said it is imposing export controls on tungsten, tellurium, ruthenium, molybdenum and ruthenium-related items to “safeguard national security interests”. China controls much of the world’s supply of such rare earths that are critical for the clean energy transition. (Evening Standard)

Dollar & Gold

The Dollar Index retreated from resistance at 110, but respect of support at 108 will likely confirm another test of 110. The threat of increased tariffs is expected to strengthen the Dollar and increase upward pressure on long-term interest rates as foreign central banks sell reserves to support their currencies.

Dollar Index

Gold broke resistance to set a new high at $2,816 per ounce. Expect retracement to test the new support level at $2,800, but respect will likely confirm our target of $3,000.

Spot Gold

Conclusion

Canada and Mexico are a sideshow, with China likely to be the primary target of US sanctions imposed by the Trump administration. China’s swift retaliation is expected to lead to escalation.

China is in a far weaker position because of its large trade surplus with the US. A trade war is expected to hurt Chinese manufacturing and raw material imports. However, the US will also likely suffer an economic slowdown as global trade shrinks.

We expect the Dollar to strengthen, driving up long-term Treasury yields, which would be bearish for stocks and bonds.

We also expect a trade war to boost demand for gold as central banks reduce their exposure to US Treasuries.

Acknowledgments

Posted on

Progress…. with Chinese characteristics | Jim Grant

….Yet as the world’s second-largest economy continues to slog through the aftermath of its debt-driven economic miracle-cum-titanic housing bubble, policymakers put their best foot forward – with Chinese characteristics. Thus, aggregate financing fell by nearly RMB 200 billion in April from the prior month, data released over the weekend show, marking the first outright contraction in that metric of broad credit availability in nearly two decades.

True to form, the government looks to sweep those inconvenient figures under the rug, as Bloomberg relays that seven separate research notes from local brokerages commenting on that data release were scrubbed from the WeChat social media platform as of this morning.

Then, too, regulators have switched off live trading data showing foreign investment flows on the mainland Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges via the Stock Connect trading link. That move, which was telegraphed in an April announcement, follows word that foreign direct investment registered at just $10.3 billion during the first quarter, down 56% from the first three months of 2023.

~ Jim Grant, Grant’s Almost Daily

Posted on

Why China’s efforts to resolve hidden government debt could fall short | Caixin Global

Local governments make extensive use of local government finance vehicles (LGFVs) to conceal debt and present a healthy balance sheet. The hidden debt presents a major risk for central government as the economy threatens a debt-deflation spiral.

From Caixin Global, March 14 2024:

China’s central government has rolled out a new round of measures since the second half of last year to help local governments swap or restructure their off-the-books borrowing in a bid to control debt risk.

However, the sheer scale of the country’s local government hidden debt — up to more than 70 trillion yuan ($9.8 trillion) according to some estimates, more than twice Germany’s GDP — means that the measures at best are far inadequate and will provide only temporary relief to what experts say is a looming liquidity crisis for regional authorities….

Posted on

Eleven reasons for optimism in the next decade

This might seem more like a wish list than a forecast — there are always risks that can derail predictions — but we believe these are high probability events over the long-term.

Our timeline is flexible, some events may take longer than a decade while others could occur a lot sooner.

Also, some of the reasons for optimism present both a problem and an opportunity. It depends on which side of the trade you are on.

#1 US Politics

The political divide in the United States is expected to heal after neither President Biden nor his predecessor, and current GOP front-runner Donald Trump, make the ballot in 2024. The first due to concerns over his age and the latter due to legal woes and inability to garner support from the center. A younger, more moderate candidate from the right (Nikki Haley) or left (Gavin Newsom?) is likely to be elected in 2024 and lead the reconciliation process, allowing Congress to focus on long-term challenges rather than political grandstanding.

Nikki Haley
Gavin Newsom

Nikki Haley & Gavin Newsom – Wikipedia

#2 The Rise of Europe

Kaja Kallas

Prime Minister of Estonia, Kaja Kallas – Wikipedia

Europe is expected to rediscover its backbone, led by the example of Eastern European leaders who have long understood the existential threat posed by Russian encroachment. Increased funding and supply of arms to Ukraine will sustain their beleaguered ally. NATO will re-arm, securing its Eastern border but is unlikely to be drawn into a war with Russia.

#3 Decline of the Autocrats

We are past peak-autocrat — when Vladimir Putin announced Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 23, 2022.

Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin announces invasion of Ukraine – CNN

Russia

The Russian economy is likely to be drained by the on-going war in Ukraine, with drone attacks on energy infrastructure bleeding Russia’s economy. Demands on the civilian population are expected to rise as oil and gas revenues dwindle.

Fire at an oil storage depot in Klintsy, southern Russia

Fire at an oil storage depot in Klintsy, southern Russia after it was hit by a Ukrainian drone – BBC

China

The CCP’s tenuous hold on power faces three critical challenges. First, an ageing population fueled by the CPP’s disastrous one-child policy (1979-2015) and declining birth rates after the 2020 COVID pandemic — a reaction to totalitarian shutdowns for political ends.

China's birth rate

Second, is the middle-income trap. Failure to overcome the political challenges of redistributing income away from local governments, state-owned enterprises and existing elites will prevent the rise of a consumer economy driven by strong levels of consumption and lower savings by the broad population.

Third, the inevitable demise of autocratic regimes because of their rigidity and inability to adapt to a changing world. Autocratic leaders grow increasingly isolated in an information silo, where subordinates are afraid to convey bad news and instead tell leaders what they want to hear. Poor feedback and doubling down on past failures destroy morale and trust in leadership, leading to a dysfunctional economy.

Iran

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – Wikipedia

Demographics are likely to triumph in Iran, with the ageing religious conservatives losing power as their numbers dwindle. The rise of a more moderate, Westernized younger generation is expected to lead to the decline of Iranian-backed extremism and greater stability in the Middle East.

#4 High Inflation

The US federal government is likely to avoid default on its $34 trillion debt, using high inflation to shrink the debt in real terms and boost GDP at the same time.

US Debt to GDP

#5 Negative real interest rates

High inflation and rising nominal Treasury yields would threaten the ability of Treasury to service interest costs on outstanding debt without deficits spiraling out of control. The Fed will be forced to suppress interest rates to save the Treasury market, further fueling high inflation. Negative real interest rates will drive up prices of real assets.

#6 US Dollar

The US Dollar will decline as the US on-shores critical industries and the current account deficit shrinks. Manufacturing jobs are expected to rise as a result — through import substitution and increased exports.

US Current Account

#7 US Treasury Market

USTs are expected to decline as the global reserve asset, motivated by long-term negative real interest rates and shrinking current account deficits.

Foreign Holdings of US Treasuries

Central bank holdings of Gold and commodities are likely to increase as distrust of fiat currencies grows, with no obvious successor to US hegemony.

#7 Nuclear Power

Investment in nuclear power is expected to skyrocket as it is recognized as the only viable long-term alternative to base-load power generated by fossil fuels. Reactors will be primarily fueled by coated uranium fuels (TRISO) that remove the risk of a critical meltdown.

TRISO fuel particles

TRISO particles consist of a uranium, carbon and oxygen fuel kernel encapsulated by three layers of carbon- and ceramic-based materials that prevent the release of radioactive fission products – Energy.gov

Thorium salts are an alternative but the technology lags a long way behind uranium reactors. Nuclear fusion is a wild card, with accelerated development likely as AI is used to solve some of the remaining technological challenges.

#8 Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Scientific advances achieved with the use of AI are expected to be at the forefront in engineering and medicine, while broad productivity gains are likely as implementation of AI applications grows.

#9 Semiconductors

Demand for semiconductors and micro-processor is likely to grow as intelligent devices become the norm across everything from electric vehicles to houses, appliances and devices.

McKinsey projections of Semiconductor Demand

#10 Industrial Commodities

Demand for industrial commodities — lithium, copper, cobalt, graphite, battery-grade nickel, and rare earth elements like neodymium (used in high-power magnets) — are expected to skyrocket as the critical materials content of EVs and other sophisticated devices grows.

Expected supply shortfall by 2030:

Critical Materials - Expected Supply Shortage to achieve Net Zero by 2030

Prices will boom as demand grows, increases in supply necessitate higher marginal costs, and inflation soars.

#11 Stock Market Boom

Stocks are expected to boom, fueled by negative real interest rates, high inflation and productivity gains from AI and nuclear.



Conclusion

There is no cause for complacency — many challenges and pitfalls face developed economies. But we so often focus on the threats that it is easy to lose sight of the fact that the glass is more than half full.

Our long-term strategy is overweight on real assets — stocks, Gold, commodities and industrial real estate — and underweight long duration financial assets like USTs.

Acknowledgements

Powered by WordPress / WordPress Maintenance Service By Website Helper