Smart. Strategic. Unfiltered.
Extract from an interview with Michael Pettis [professor of finance at Peking University in Beijing] on the Daily Ticker talking about China’s economy, which he claims is not headed for disaster, but will necessarily slow as the economy rebalances. Full HD interview can be watched here: http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/plenty-things-worry-china-bird-flu-not-one-174030450.html
“History…. suggests that whatever we decide to do, let’s decide to do it on the premise of: there are limits to what our power can accomplish in the world — especially military power — and sometimes there may be other alternatives to using military power to shape a world that we want to see……”
To paraphrase Abraham Maslow: If your favorite tool is a hammer, every problem starts to resemble a nail.
The views expressed by Colonel Gentile here do not necessarily represent those of the United States government or the Department of Defense.
This interview was recorded shortly after the event, “The War in Afghanistan: What Went Wrong?” at the Cato Institute April 5, 2013.
http://www.cato.org/events/war-afghan.
The S&P 500 is headed for resistance at 1575, after repeated tests of support at 1540. Breakout above 1575 would test 1600*, but reversal below 1540 remains as likely and would warn of a correction. Although ripe for a correction, 13-week Twiggs Momentum troughs above zero continue to reflect a strong primary up-trend.
* Target calculation: 1475 + ( 1475 – 1350 ) = 1600
David Potts at the Sydney Morning Herald writes:
Retirees with far less than $2 million in superannuation face extra tax bills…… the new tax will apply to all earnings above $100,000 a year from 2014, no matter the size of the nest egg.
The tax net is far broader than the 16,000, or 0.4 percent of retirees, mentioned in the recent announcement. Treasury estimates cited are based on a projected 5 per cent rate of return on investment and ignore the fact that returns can fluctuate widely, from 30% in a good year to -30% in a really bad year. Super funds with as little as $200,000 or $300,000 are affected if they earn more than $100,000 in any given year.
The problem is further exacerbated by capital gains, especially for self-managed funds that are not widely diversified. If a super fund sells a property or large block of shares, the asset may have been held for many years but the entire capital gain is recognized in the year in which the asset is sold. Despite some phase-in concessions, lumpy capital gains could lift a retiree over the $100,000 income threshold.
This is a deliberate tax grab that affects ordinary Australians while being sold to them under the smokescreen of “taxing the rich”.
Read more at Super plan contains a booby trap | David Potts | SMH.
Hat tip to Ody for bringing this to my attention on Incredible Charts forum.
Jesse Eisinger’s interview with risk specialist John Breit highlights an issue facing Australian banks. Residential mortgages are allocated a low risk weighting — 15% to 17% because of historic performance — compared to 50% for US banks. The big four banks piled into this area because of the perceived low risk, leveraging up to 50 times capital. Risk-weighted capital ratios (around 10%) still appear healthy, but they conceal a hidden danger from the resulting housing bubble.
[Breit] despises the concept of “risk-weighted assets,” where banks put up capital based on the perceived riskiness of the assets. Inevitably, he argues, banks will “pile into” the same types of supposedly safe investments, creating bubbles that make the risks far more severe than the initial perceptions. Paradoxically, risk-weighting can leave banks setting aside the least capital to cover the biggest dangers.
“I could not be more disappointed,” he said. “The cynic in me thinks this is all in the interests of senior management and regulators to avoid blame. They may not think they can prevent the next crisis, but they then can blame the statistics.”
Read more at Why Risk Managers Should Be Spymasters – ProPublica.
Professor Minxin Pei analyzes the options facing the Chinese Communist Party:
…it appears that what informs the political thinking of China’s new leadership is the experience of the late-Soviet regime. In particular, three different leaders and their policies apparently weigh heavily on the minds of the new occupants of Zhongnanhai. Having endured a decade of political stagnation amid rapid economic growth, China’s new leaders are obviously not in a mood to try another version of the Brezhnev model, the essence of which is pretending to govern while doing nothing in reality. Yet, aware of the enormous risks of introducing democratic reforms into a sclerotic political system, they abhor the radical Gorbachev model even more.
Read more at One Soviet Leader China Could Emulate…and it’s not Gorbachev | The Diplomat.
Their problem is that the other roads lead to nowhere and eventually they will be forced to embrace democratic reform. Rather than rejecting the Gorbachev option, the CCP should analyze the process and look for ways to minimize the disruption. Gradual transition to a central governing council of 7 to 9 elected officials representing all major political parties, with the CCP initially holding the majority of seats, seems the lowest risk alternative.
The ASX 200 broke medium-term support at 4950, signaling the start of a correction for Australian stocks. Reversal of 21-day Twiggs Money Flow below zero confirms medium-term selling pressure.
Initial target for a correction is the rising trendline around 4700. Even correction back to 4500 does not disrupt the primary up-trend and would present buying opportunities for investors.
* Target calculation: 5000 + ( 5000 – 4500 ) = 5500
The yield on 10-year Treasury Notes retreated below 2.00%. Falling bond yields indicate the expected time horizon for low short-term interest rates is lengthening — a negative reflection on the economy.
The first line of support for $TNX is 1.70%; breach would signal another attempt at 1.40%. Bullish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Momentum indicates that a base is forming and primary support is unlikely to be broken.
The S&P 500 retreated from its 2007 high at 1575.
* Target calculation: 1530 + ( 1530 – 1485 ) = 1575
Bearish divergence on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow continues to warn of mild selling pressure. Breach of support at 1530 — and the rising trendline — would warn of a correction.
The Russell 2000 Index is stronger, having broken clear of its 2007 high at 860. A correction that respects the new support level (860) would confirm a strong primary up-trend.
While there are structural flaws in the US economy, QE from the Fed has forced investors to increase risk in search of yield. The current advance shows no signs of ending.
Gideon Rachman points out in Financial Times that the doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD), employed by the West in nuclear confrontations, assumes a rational adversary:
In many respects, North Korea has replicated some of the very worst features of Maoist China: the isolation from the outside world, the labour camps, the cult of personality and the willingness to tolerate mass starvation at home. The latter is particularly chilling, when one remembers that nuclear deterrence is meant to rely on an unwillingness to accept the death of millions of your compatriots.
Read more at North Korea tests the limits of a MAD world | Business Spectator.
Ralph Benko shares an insight on US healthcare from columnist Warren Brookes on Forbes:
Brookes shared an indelible insight. He observed that it was possible to provide good health care at an affordable cost through the free market, rationing it by price. And it was possible to provide good health care at an affordable cost by the government through state agencies, rationing it by thoughtful policy. And that America had managed to create a monstrous hybrid of the two, the worst possible system: lousy care at unaffordable prices.
Read more at Mitch McConnell Prepares To Give Barack Obama The Political Shellacking Of A Lifetime – Forbes.