Author: Colin Twiggs

Colin Twiggs is a former investment banker with almost 40 years of experience in financial markets. He co-founded Incredible Charts and writes the popular Trading Diary and Patient Investor newsletters. Using a top-down approach, Colin identifies key macro trends in the global economy before evaluating selected opportunities using a combination of fundamental and technical analysis. Focusing on interest rates and financial market liquidity as primary drivers of the economic cycle, he warned of the 2008/2009 and 2020 bear markets well ahead of actual events. He founded PVT Capital (AFSL No. 546090) in May 2023, which offers investment strategy and advice to wholesale clients.
Posted on

A tectonic shift hurts highly-leveraged sectors

The global economy is experiencing a tectonic shift — from a lack of demand (requiring stimulus) to a lack of supply (requiring suppression of demand).

The sharp rise in interest rates is just part of the adjustment to the new reality.

The rise in short-term rates did not have much impact on consumer spending. Personal Consumption is still above pre-pandemic levels relative to disposable personal income, while the savings rate has fallen to almost half of pre-pandemic levels.

Personal Consumption/Disposable Personal Income

High prices are the cure for high prices

The bond market and oil markets are now testing the assumption that the economy can cope with high interest rates and pull off a soft landing.

Two key prices — long-term interest rates and crude oil — are rising. This is likely to cause a strong contraction.

Mortgage rates (7.49% for 30-year) are at their highest level in more than 20 years.

30-Year Mortgage Rate

Corporate debt more than doubled relative to GDP since the 1980s, as corporations took advantage of cheap debt. When they roll over borrowings, they are now confronted with a sharp increase in debt servicing costs, forcing them to de-leverage.

Non-Financial Corporate Debt/GDP

Telecommunications Sector

The impact is clearly visible on sectors with high debt levels — like telecommunications, utilities, and real estate. The chart below compares performance of major telecommunications companies.

Telecommunications Sector

Only Orange (FNCTF), the French national carrier, has held its value since the start of 2022. Some, like Telstra (TLS) and Vodafone (VOD), succeeded in reducing debt by selling key assets (e.g. mobile phone towers) into a separate infrastructure trust. Spanish carrier Telefonica (TEFOF) has also done reasonably well, selling off some international interests. Many — notably Verizon (VZ), AT&T (T), Vodafone (VOD), and BT Group (BT) — have lost 40% of value in less than two years. Belgian carrier Proxima (BGAOF) gets the wooden spoon with a 60% loss.

Further adjustment will be necessary as the recent rise in long-term interest rates forces corporations to rein in capital expenditure and shed non-core assets in order to reduce debt exposure. That in turn impacts on equipment manufacturers like Ericsson (ERIC) and Nokia (NOK).

Ericsson (ERIC) and Nokia (NOK)

Conclusion

Rising long-term interest rates and crude oil prices are likely to cause a global economic contraction.

Sectors with high debt levels — like telecommunications, utilities, and real estate — will be forced to restructure due to rising interest rates. This is likely to have a domino effect on other sectors of the economy.

Acknowledgements

Posted on

Causes of inflation – a Monetarist perspective

20-minute summary by Prof. John Hearn

Cost-push inflation is a myth. Rising prices do not cause inflation unless you have more units of money to spend.

Demand-pull — caused by an expanding supply of money and its effect on aggregate demand — is only way you get inflation.

Managers of the money stock (central banks) are the cause.

If you only have £100 to spend and the price of gas goes up, you can still only spend £100. The relative prices of the basket of goods you purchase will adjust to find a new equilibrium.

But if the government borrows an extra £10 from the central bank, increasing the stock of money, prices will adjust to include the additional £10 spent by the government. The same basket of goods will now cost £110 and you have inflation.

That is why central banks hate monetarists. They would prefer you to believe that rising prices (cost-push) causes inflation.

Their deception is aided by the time lag between <>M and <>P of up to 2 years (<> = delta/change). From Milton Friedman’s Quantity Theory of Money: M * V = P * T (where M is money stock, V is velocity of money flow, P is prices and T is transactions)

Not all government borrowing is inflationary as it does not increase M unless debt is bought by the central bank.

Posted on

Nuclear or renewables?

Fossil fuels were the source of 83.7% of energy produced in the USA for the first half of 2023, compared to 7.8% for nuclear and 8.4% for renewables.

US Energy Sources

Take a closer look at renewables and 5.0% of the total comes from biomass — wood and biofuels like ethanol. Solar contributes 0.9% and wind 1.5%, for a total of only 2.4%.

US Energy Sources

The scale required to achieve a tenfold increase in wind and solar is hard to imagine. France, on the other hand, has already demonstrated what can be achieved with nuclear.

France: Nuclear

Uranium

Uranium prices are soaring, with the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SRUUF) climbing to a new high since its formation in 2021.

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SRUUF)

As John Quakes explained, on the social media site formerly known as Twitter, the shortage is caused by Rosatom buying uranium in Western markets due to sanctions restricting shipping insurance in Russia:

US Energy Sources: Renewables

Conclusion

Nuclear is the only viable option to replace fossil fuels for electricity generation. Renewables such as wind and solar may contribute but nuclear is the only option that can be implemented on such a scale.

Uranium prices are soaring and are likely to remain high for as long as Russia occupies part of Ukraine.

Acknowledgements

Posted on

Investing in Real Estate

In Monday’s update, we compared investing in stocks to investing in financial securities and concluded that stocks offer better long-term performance. Today, we use long-term data series for US and Australian real estate to evaluate their comparative performance.

US real estate data was sourced from Prof Robert Shiller, who created the Case-Shiller Index series. The chart below shows that US home prices from 1933 to 2023, a period of ninety years, appreciated to 69.5 times their original value.

Home Price Index

Adjusting for inflation, we get real appreciation of 2.9 times.

Again, CPI seems to understate inflation. Comparing the home price index to Gold, rather than CPI, provides a more accurate measure of appreciation in real terms. Gold appreciated 94.5 times over the same period, so the home price index actually lost value.

Calculation: 69.5/94.5 = 0.735 (i.e. a 26.5% loss of value)

Comparing data sources

A second source of home price data compares median prices, based on sales of existing homes, from 1953 to 2023. That shows growth of 22 times over the past seventy years, which is close to the Home Price Index appreciation of 21.25 over the same period.

Median Home Prices, Existing Homes

Australia

Australian housing data is harder to come by but we found an excellent source of long-term median house price data in the 2007 UNSW thesis of Dr Nigel David Stapledon. Using data from within the thesis, we were able to adjust nominal house prices to reflect constant quality (house values with no improvements) below.

Median Home Prices, Existing Homes, Constant Quality

Australian house prices appreciated 191.4 times between 1933 and 2006.

Unfortunately the data ends there, so we had to calculate a weighted average of median houses for 2007 to the present.

CoreLogic kindly provided us with values for their hedonic Home Value Index (for 5 Capital Cities) which also adjusts for quality:

Property Type	31/01/2007	31/07/2023
Houses		$399,182	$891,747

The gain of 2.23 is slightly higher than the 2.14 calculated from weighted average data for the 8 capital cities provided by the ABS.

Median Home Prices, Weighted Average of 8 Capital Cities

We opted for the higher figure from CoreLogic as likely to be more in line with the earlier Stapledon data. That gives a total nominal gain, adjusted for quality, of 426.8 for the ninety years from 1933 to 2023.

The price of Gold fines was fixed at £6-3/9 per troy ounce fine according to the Sydney Morning Herald on 2 January 1933, that converts to 12.375 Australian Dollars. Total gain for Gold in Australian Dollars over the past ninety years is therefore 232.9 times (A$2881.90/12.375).

We calculate the real gain for Australian house prices as 1.83 times over the past ninety years (426.8/232.9).

Conclusion

The US Home Price Index lost 26.5% in real terms, over the past ninety years (1933 – 2023), when compared to Gold.

The S&P 500 appreciated 6.8 times over the past ninety years when measured against Gold, and 9.7 times compared to US real estate (Home Price Index).

Using Gold as the benchmark, we conclude that Australian real estate prices appreciated faster than US real estate over the past ninety years, growing 1.83 times in real terms, whereas the US depreciated to 0.735 of its original real value.

We suspect the difference is largely due to the substantial fall in US real estate values after the 2008 sub-prime crisis, whereas Australian home prices continued to grow. We expect that performance of the two will converge in the long-term.

Lastly, when measured against Gold, US stocks outperformed Australian real estate. The S&P 500 grew 3.7 times against Australian home prices, in real terms, over the past ninety years.

This does not mean that we should ignore real estate as an investment medium. But a portfolio concentrated in real estate, without diversification into stocks and precious metals, could underperform in the long-term.

Acknowledgements

Posted on

Why invest in stocks?

Some clients are understandably nervous about investing in stocks because of the volatility. Invest at the wrong time and you can experience a draw-down that takes years to recover. Many shy away, preferring the security of term deposits or the bricks and mortar of real estate investments.

The best argument for investing in stocks is two of the most enduring long-term trends in finance.

First, the secular down-trend in purchasing power of the Dollar.

Dollar Purchasing Power

Inflation has been eating away at investors’ capital for more than ninety years. Purchasing power of the Dollar declined from 794 in 1933 to 33 today — a loss of almost 96%. That means $24 today can only buy what one Dollar bought in 1933.

The second trend, by no coincidence, is the appreciation of real asset prices over the same time period.

The S&P 500 grew from 7.03 at the start of 1933 to 4546 in June 2023 — 649 times the original investment.

S&P 500 Index

Gold data is only available since 1959. In April 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt signed Executive Order 6102, forbidding “the hoarding of Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates” by US citizens. Americans were required to hand in their gold by May 1st in return for compensation at $20.67 per ounce. Since then, Gold has appreciated 94.5 times its 1933 exchange value in Dollar terms.

Spot Gold Prices

Over time, investing in real assets has protected investors’ capital from the ravages of inflation, while financial assets have for long periods failed to adequately compensate investors in real terms (after inflation). The chart below compares the yield on Moody’s Aaa corporate bonds to CPI inflation.

Moody's Aaa Corporate Bond Yield & CPI

Conclusion

Purchasing power of the Dollar depreciated by 24 times over the past ninety years due to inflation. Adjusting for inflation, the S&P 500 has grown to 27 times its original Dollar value in 1933, while Gold gained 3.9 times in real terms.

We would argue that the consumer price index understates inflation. Gold does not grow in value — it is constant in real terms.

If we take Gold as our benchmark of real value, then the S&P 500 has grown 6.8 times in real terms — a far more believable performance.

Stocks are a great hedge against inflation provided the investor can tolerate volatility in their portfolio. How to manage volatility will be the subject of discussion in a further update.

Acknowledgents

 

Posted on

Investing is a loser’s game

I’ve said this many times before but I think it bears repeating. Investing is a loser’s game, one that is won by making the fewest mistakes. There will be times, sometimes fleeting, when the payoff from being bold is so large you have to make the bet. But those moments, periods when sentiment becomes so extreme it can’t last, are rare. The rest of the time, investors are much better served by making only small changes to avoid large mistakes. ~ Joseph Calhoun III, Alhambra Investments

Posted on

Henry Fielding | The best advice ever written

By Henry Fielding, more than two centuries ago, in The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling (1749):

Wisdom, in short, whose lessons have been represented as so hard to learn by those who were never at her school, teaches us only to extend a simple maxim universally known and followed even in the lowest life, a little farther than that life carries it. And this is not to buy at too dear a price.

Now, whoever takes this maxim abroad with him into the grand market of the world, and constantly applies it to honors, to riches, to pleasures, and to every other commodity which that market affords, is, I will venture to affirm, a wise man; and must be so acknowledged in the worldly sense of the word: for he makes the best of bargains, since in reality he purchases everything at the price of a little trouble, and carries home all the goods I have mentioned, while he keeps his health, his innocence and his reputation, the common prices which are paid for them by others, entire and to himself.

Posted on

New RBA governor

New RBA Governor

The Treasurer has appointed Michele Bullock as Governor of the RBA for a seven-year term commencing 18 September 2023.

Michele Bullock was deputy governor under Phil Lowe, so a sensible move. Not a Labour Party stooge as the market feared.

Posted on

Fed Faces Three Uncomfortable Truths

IMF deputy head Gita Gopinath

IMF deputy head, Gita Gopinath, recently highlighted three uncomfortable truths for monetary policy:

  1. Inflation is taking too long to get back to target.
    Financial conditions may not be tight enough and sustained high inflation could make the task of bringing inflation down more difficult.
  2. Central banks’ price and financial stability objectives conflict.
    Central banks can provide liquidity to struggling banks but are not equipped to deal with problems of insolvency which may be caused by a sharp rise in interest rates.
  3. We face more upside inflation risks.
    The past two decades of low inflation are over and the global economy faces inflationary pressures from:
    • On-shoring of critical supply chains;
    • Rising geopolitical tensions (with Russia, China and Iran);
    • Transition away from coal, oil and gas to low-CO2 energy sources (renewables & nuclear); and
    • Spiraling demand for critical materials needed to meet the above challenges.

Balancing monetary policy is going to be difficult, especially where prices are under pressure from a number of challenges. We expect central banks to tolerate higher inflation for longer in order to preserve financial stability.

Fed only expects to hit 2.0% inflation target in 2025

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell recently highlighted the above conflict between policies to tame inflation and maintain financial stability. During a recent ECB panel discussion, Powell indicated that he only expects the Fed to hit their 2.0% inflation target for core inflation in 2025.

The Fed Chair says job creation and real wage gains are driving real incomes and increased spending. That raises demand which in turn drives the labor market. (WSJ)

Unemployment increased slightly to 3.7% in May but remains near record lows. The tight labor market continues to fuel strong growth in hourly earnings.

Unemployment, Average Hourly Earnings Growth

Tighter monetary policy would drive up unemployment — as demand slackens and layoffs increase — and dampen inflationary pressures. But at the risk of financial instability.

Conclusion

Further monetary tightening is necessary in order to increase the slack in labor markets, weaken demand, and curb inflation in the short-term. But the required policy steps — rate hikes and QT — are likely to crash the economy.

Rather than create financial stability through vigorous monetary tightening, the Fed is likely to tolerate higher levels of inflation — above their 2.0% target — for a longer period.

A less-hawkish stance from the Fed would be bullish for Gold.

Posted on

Russia | Putin in Crisis

From Foreign Affairs, June 24th:

On Friday night, political infighting in Moscow spilled out into the open, with Yevgeny Prigozhin, the head of Russia’s Wagner mercenary group, accusing the Russian military of attacking his forces and vowing to retaliate. In messages published on his official Telegram channel, Prigozhin also claimed that all of the Kremlin’s publicly stated reasons for launching the war in Ukraine were lies. Following these developments, Russia’s state security agency, the FSB, opened a criminal case against Prigozhin, accusing him of calling for an armed rebellion….

Russian TV

Prigozhin has seized control of Rostov-on-Don, the major logistical hub for the war in Ukraine, with vast stockpiles of munitions and supplies. He now has complete control of Russia’s ability to continue the war in Ukraine, giving him a strong negotiating position to settle his dispute with the Kremlin.

Rostov-on-Don

Rostov-on-Don Interview

At this stage, an advance on Moscow seems unlikely.

It is dangerous to predict how events will unfold. Already the window for negotiations is closing.

Rostov-on-Don

There are reports of Wagner seizing a second major city on the road to Moscow, meeting little opposition.

Voronezh

Tom Nichols in The Atlantic:

“Think of this conflict not as a contest between the Russian state and a mercenary group, but a falling out among gangsters, a kind of Mafia war…..

But no matter how this ends, Prigozhin has shattered Putin’s narrative, torching the war as a needless and even criminal mistake. That’s a problem for Putin that could outlast this rebellion.”

Michael McFaul, former ambassador to Moscow under the Obama administration, in the Journal of Democracy, February 2023:

Putin’s luck ran out in 2022. By launching a full-scale, barbaric invasion of Ukraine one year ago, Putin has caused horrific bloodshed and suffering in Ukraine, hurting the very “brothers and sisters” he supposedly seeks to “protect” while also failing to achieve most of his war aims. But Putin’s war in Ukraine has also triggered deep damage to his own country, especially to Russia’s armed forces, the economy, society, and, in the long run, to his own regime. Ironically, Putin’s destruction of democracy in Russia decades ago created the conditions for this disastrous decision in 2022 — a decision that may eventually unravel the very autocracy that he constructed and has been consolidating for so long.

Conclusion

Autocracy has two major flaws. First, no one wants to give an autocrat bad news. Dictators only get told what they want to hear, leaving them badly out of touch. Poor decision-making is the inevitable result.

Second, suppression may quell dissent but leaves no release for the buildup of underlying pressures, creating the illusion of stability but fueling the potential to explode into violence at any time.

A breakdown of law and order in Russia, while it may have long-term benefits, is a dangerous situation that could easily spiral out of control. With disastrous consequences not only for the people of Russia but for surrounding regions within Russia’s “sphere of influence”. Belarus, Georgia, Syria, Armenia, Azerbaijan….. all are at risk of unrest as opposing factions attempt to take advantage of a distracted Kremlin.

It also increases the risk of high-risk behavior in Ukraine from the Kremlin.

Zaporizhzia

Powered by WordPress / WordPress Maintenance Service By Website Helper