Tag: Inflation

Posted on

Australia: How the CPI hid the housing bubble – On Line Opinion

We can combine the main areas where housing has been stricken from the CPI – the removal of mortgage costs, quality adjustments to rent, and reduction in weight to home ownership costs – to see what difference it would make had the pre-1998 methodology been continued. The resulting MacroStats cost-of-living index is plotted below against the headline CPI.

MacroStats Cost-of-living index

….We can again see how this measure tracks the official CPI very closely until 1998. Since 1998 it is 0.73 percentage points higher on average (or 3.8%), and in the period 2001-2008, it averaged 1.3 percentage points higher (or 4.4%pa). That gives you some idea of how significant the 1998 methodological shift in the CPI was in disguising housing inflation and creating a feedback loop with lower monetary policy.

via How the CPI hid the housing bubble – On Line Opinion – 20/10/2011.

We need to be wary of bodies like the RBA lobbying to change the composition of the CPI. Performance measurement has to be independent in order to be effective.

Posted on

The Sceptical Inflationist | Steve Saville | Safehaven.com

The reason we are in the inflation camp is that the case for more inflation in the US doesn’t depend on private-sector credit expansion; it depends on the ability and willingness of the Fed to monetise sufficient debt to keep the total supply of money growing. A consistent theme in our commentaries over the past 10 years has been that the Fed could and would keep the inflation going after the private sector became saturated with debt.

Up until 2008 there was very little in the way of empirical evidence to support the view that the Fed COULD inflate in the face of a private sector credit contraction, but that’s no longer the situation. Thanks to what happened during 2008-2009, we can now be certain that the Fed has the ability to counteract the effects on the money supply of widespread private sector de-leveraging. The only question left open to debate is: will the Fed CHOOSE to do whatever it takes to keep the inflation going in the future?

via The Sceptical Inflationist | Steve Saville | Safehaven.com.

Posted on

Fed Shifts Bond Portfolio – WSJ.com

The Fed is trying to ease financial conditions without taking the more controversial step of increasing the amount of money that it’s pumping into the financial system, since it will be using money already generated from other programs. A bond buying program the Fed completed in June was widely criticized internally and externally because it pumped $600 billion of newly printed money into the financial system, sparking fears of inflation……..

The more potent step of launching a new round of bond purchases that would further expand the Fed’s $2.867 trillion balance sheet remains a possibility, but inflation likely would need to slow much further to spur Fed officials to take that step……..

Economists aren’t so sure that the Fed’s latest gambit will do much to spur growth.

“The odds are ‘Operation Twist’ won’t work,” Anthony Sanders, a real-estate finance professor at George Mason University, said before the Fed action. The housing market has shown no reaction to interest rates that are already at record-low levels, he said. Freddie Mac’s latest survey finds the average rate on 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages at 4.09%, the lowest level in more than 50 years.

via Fed Shifts Bond Portfolio – WSJ.com.

Posted on

China’s Lessons From Mexico and Japan – WSJ.com

China might have more to worry about. Wages in the low-skill manufacturing sector are rising fast. On their current trajectory, they will double in the next five years. Low-skill jobs have already started to migrate elsewhere and will continue to do so. Public spending on education, at 3% of GDP in 2009, compares unfavorably to an average of 5% in the grouping of upper-middle-income countries to which China aspires. Reform of the financial system has fallen by the wayside as banks continue to funnel savings to low-yielding state-sponsored projects.

via Heard on the Street: China’s Lessons From Mexico and Japan – WSJ.com.

Posted on

What we need and what we actually get may be vastly different

This is in response to a question raised by Thomas Franklin:

Hi Colin,

….. My question is not just about the bond market although it is part of it but a reflection of the bigger picture globally with what is unfolding. With many governments facing rising debt levels and the Feds policy of financial stimulus, surely this is just delaying the inevitable of “Global Financial Meltdown” The USA and the dollar is a sinking ship, with the Fed losing the battle of bailing the ship out. So what do you think will replace the system we currently have?

Hi Thomas,
What we need and what we actually get may be vastly different.
Firstly, what we need:

  • A consensus Swiss-style democracy instead of the winner-takes-all system we have at present, where incumbent politicians run up fiscal debt in order to boost their chances of re-election.
  • Restrict the Fed to a single mandate, to protect the currency, rather than targeting inflation to help the politicians.
  • Restrict capital flows between countries, like China/Japan’s purchase of >$2 trillion of US Treasurys, used to manipulate exchange rates and create a massive advantage for their export industries.
  • Austerity to cut unnecessary spending and public works programs to improve national infrastructure and create employment — but the programs must deliver real returns on investment so they can later be sold off to repay debt.
  • Europe needs a eurobond system, with central borrowing and restrictions on individual member deficits.

What we will probably get is:

  • More of the same: government controlled by special interests and dominated by fear of the next election.
  • The Fed going nuclear and buying more Treasurys — creating inflation to bail out the banks and save Treasury from default.
  • Inflation as a soft form of default to give bondholders (read China/Japan) a haircut and deter them from buying more Treasurys.
  • More profligate spending and ill-chosen, bridge-to-nowhere infrastructure projects.
  • A breakup of the Euro?

Hope that doesn’t sound to optimistic 🙂

Regards, Colin

Powered by WordPress / WordPress Maintenance By WPSmart