Gradually Then Suddenly

Ernest Hemingway’s 1926 novel The Sun Also Rises contains this snippet, fondly referred to as the Hemingway Law of Motion:

“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked.
“Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.”

Niels Clemens Jensen at Absolute Return Partners has published an interesting piece on de-dollarisation. He believes that the US can get away with a lot more bad policy choices than the UK because the Dollar is the global reserve currency:

British investors learned (the hard way) what the consequences are when your Prime Minister mistakenly believes that large-scale tax cuts can be financed with borrowings. Liz Truss tried to do that in October 2022 and, within days, she was history.

You may wonder why the Americans can get away with such things when the British cannot, and the answer is simple. The Americans benefit from the US dollar’s reserve currency status, which means that foreign investors hold massive amounts of US debt but little UK debt.

However, poor policy choices have reduced the Dollar’s role as the global reserve currency. We are past the tipping point, and the shrinkage rate is accelerating.

I am not at all suggesting that the US is about to turn into the next Argentina. Nor am I saying that we are about to witness a repeat of the Liz Truss narrative. The US economy possesses so much talent and so many resources that an awful lot of bad decisions have to be made, before we are even close to an Argentina-like situation.

However, what I want to say with this is that the ongoing de-dollarisation will change the name of the game, and Americans had better realise that the rules are different, if you are no longer the hyperpower of the world.

Despite all Trump’s warnings, a change is underway…..

De-Dollarization

The watershed in de-dollarization may have been in 1971 when Richard Nixon removed the Dollar from the gold standard. However, the rot started earlier, with Lyndon Johnson’s guns-and-butter policies of the 1960s. Johnson prioritized expanding welfare with his Great Society programs but was caught up in the Cold War arms race and the Vietnam War. The conflicting demands strained the US budget, with rising deficits eroding confidence in the Dollar.

President Charles de Gaulle started a run on the Dollar in 1965 when he announced France’s intention to exchange US dollar reserves for gold at the official exchange rate. The French Navy sailed across the Atlantic to collect French gold, setting off demands by other states. This forced US President Nixon to end the convertibility of the Dollar to gold in August 1971 to prevent erosion of US gold reserves.

Removing the gold standard opened the Dollar to currency manipulation. Japan led the way, accumulating large reserves in US Dollars. The weak Yen gave Japanese manufacturers an enormous advantage over their US counterparts in export markets and the US domestic market.

US Current Account Deficit

Japan’s example was followed by South Korea, Germany, and China, forcing the US to run large fiscal and current account deficits to accommodate the excess savings of trading partners.

The supposed benefit of the strong Dollar—low interest rates—fed ballooning debt and rising instability as strains on the US economy increased.

The US net international investment position deteriorated from the world’s largest creditor to the world’s largest debtor.

US Net International Investment Position

The manufacturing sector was dealt a devastating blow, with industrial output plummeting as industry shed millions of jobs. The chart below reflects US manufacturing output relative to real GDP since the early 1970s.

US Industrial Output to Real GDP

The Tipping Point

Historian Niall Ferguson argues that a tipping point is reached when the cost of servicing government debt exceeds the defense budget. According to Ferguson, no hegemon in history has ever restored its previous supremacy after reaching that tipping point. When your economy can no longer support your military, however dominant it is, it becomes only a matter of time.

US Federal Spending on Defense & Interest
US Federal Spending on Defense & Interest - Sources

Conclusion

The typical complacent response is that the United States is far too powerful to be challenged, and there is no real substitute for the Dollar as global reserve currency or US Treasuries as global reserve asset. However, decades of economic mismanagement have eroded confidence in the Dollar as a store of value. Geopolitical blunders also squandered much of the advantage accumulated from the post-WWII Pax Americana.

The decline in American power over the past two decades is likely to seem gradual compared to its eventual collapse. Applying Hemingway’s Law of Motion, the change should come quickly once the tipping point is reached.

The Pax Romana lasted several centuries, but its decline was swift after Rome’s economic dominance crumbled. British dominance lasted from the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 to the outbreak of the First World War in 1914. Britain’s navy still ruled the waves for another three decades, but its economic decline had already begun.

President-elect Trump has promised to reverse the US economic slide. Unfortunately, his chance of getting that right is closer to William Buckley1 than Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon.

Please note that this does not necessarily mean that the US central role in the global economy will be replaced by China, which faces its own set of challenges. What is more likely is a destabilizing vacuum, with rival states jostling for power and riding roughshod over their weaker neighbors. Ancient Greek historian Thucydides observed, in his History of the Peloponnesian War (c. 400 BC), on the conflict between Athens and Sparta:

The strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must.

In times of uncertainty, demand for gold rises.

Acknowledgments

Notes

  1. In Australian vernacular, “Buckley’s chance” refers to William Buckley, who escaped from a convict ship in 1803 and was left presumed dead when the ship drew anchor and sailed onwards to Sydney. Thirty years later, Buckley turned up to greet the first ships arriving to settle the Port of Melbourne, having survived in the bush against improbable odds, supported by indigenous tribes.

A new Gold Standard is being born | Telegraph Blogs

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writes:

The world is moving step by step towards a de facto Gold Standard, without any meetings of G20 leaders to announce the idea or bless the project. Some readers will already have seen the GFMS Gold Survey for 2012 which reported that central banks around the world bought more bullion last year in terms of tonnage than at any time in almost half a century. They added a net 536 tonnes in 2012 as they diversified fresh reserves away from the four fiat suspects: dollar, euro, sterling, and yen…….

It is no secret that China is buying the dips, seeking to raise the gold share of its reserves well above 2pc.

Read more at A new Gold Standard is being born – Telegraph Blogs.

Econbrowser: Europe in 1931

What happened in 1931 to turn a bad economic downturn into the Great Depression? Dramatic events in Europe included failure of Credit-Anstalt, Austria’s biggest bank, in May of 1931. That was followed by bank runs in Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Poland, and Germany. As is often the case historically, the financial problems were a combination of a banking crisis….and a currency crisis…..

In 1931, countries faced doubts about whether they would stay on the gold standard, and had a choice of either to abandon gold or else to inflict further domestic economic damage in the form of monetary contraction and price deflation. Those doubts and their damage ended up bouncing across countries like a ping pong ball.

via Econbrowser: Europe in 1931.

Paul L. Kasriel: Don’t End the Fed, Mend the Fed

Although the return to a gold standard for our monetary system has much appeal, it is unlikely to occur. So, let’s not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Perhaps there is second-best monetary policy approach to the gold standard that might achieve most of the desirable outcomes of a gold standard but might have a greater probability of actually being adopted……. My suggested approach is very similar to one advocated by Milton Friedman at least 60 years ago. The more things change, the more they stay the same, I guess. I am proposing that the Federal Reserve target and control growth in the sum of credit created by private monetary financial institutions (commercial banks, S&Ls and credit unions) and the credit created by the Fed itself. I believe that this approach to monetary policy would reduce the amplitude of business cycles, would prevent sustained rapid increases in the prices of goods/services and would prevent asset-price bubbles of the magnitude of the recent NASDAQ and housing experiences.

econtrarian_043012.pdf (application/pdf Object).