Beware of the CAPE

I have just read John Mauldin’s warning that the market is overvalued:

Not only does today’s CAPE of 25.4x suggest a seriously overvalued market, but the rapid multiple expansion of the last few years coupled with sluggish earnings growth suggests that this market is also seriously overbought, as I pointed out last week and as we are seeing play out this week.

CAPE

Robert Shiller’s CAPE ratio compares the current index price to a 10-year simple moving average of inflation-adjusted earnings in order to smooth out earnings and provide a long-term indication as to whether the market is under- or over-valued. But ratios are far from infallible. One of the first things fundamental investors/traders learn is: do not buy a stock simply because the Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio is low, and never short a stock simply because the PE ratio is high. The reason is fairly obvious. In the first case, current earnings may be expected to fall and, with high PE ratios, earnings are likely to grow.

Let’s examine CAPE more closely. First, we have experienced the worst recession in almost a century; so does a moving average of the last 10 years adequately reflect sustainable long-term earnings? In the chart below I removed the highest and lowest quarter’s earnings in the last 10 years [dark green]. Note the visible difference losses reported in Q/E December 2008 make to the long-term average.

Price Earnings Ratio

The chart also highlights the fact that Shiller’s CAPE is relatively low compared to the last 15 years, where the average is close to 30. The normal PE of 18.4, calculated on the last 12-month’s earnings*, is also low compared to an average of 28 for the last 15 years.

*Reporting for the December quarter is not yet completed and unreported earnings are based on S&P estimates.

As novice investors learn, it is dangerous to base buy or sell signals on a PE ratio, whether it is CAPE or regular PE based on 12-months earnings. Using CAPE, we would have sold stocks in 1996 and again in 2003, missing two of the biggest bull markets in history. And we would have most likely bought in 2008, when CAPE made a new 10-year low, right before the collapse of Lehmann Brothers.

I submit that CAPE or PE ratios are not an end in themselves, but merely a useful tool for highlighting expectations of future earnings. At present both ratios are rising, suggesting that earnings prospects are improving.

Beware of the CAPE

I have just read John Mauldin’s warning that the market is overvalued:

Not only does today’s CAPE of 25.4x suggest a seriously overvalued market, but the rapid multiple expansion of the last few years coupled with sluggish earnings growth suggests that this market is also seriously overbought, as I pointed out last week and as we are seeing play out this week.

CAPE

Robert Shiller’s CAPE ratio compares the current index price to a 10-year simple moving average of inflation-adjusted earnings in order to smooth out earnings and provide a long-term indication as to whether the market is under- or over-valued. But ratios are far from infallible. One of the first things fundamental investors/traders learn is: do not buy a stock simply because the Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio is low, and never short a stock simply because the PE ratio is high. The reason is fairly obvious. In the first case, current earnings may be expected to fall and, with high PE ratios, earnings are likely to grow.

Let’s examine CAPE more closely. First, we have experienced the worst recession in almost a century; so does a moving average of the last 10 years adequately reflect sustainable long-term earnings? In the chart below I removed the highest and lowest quarter’s earnings in the last 10 years [dark green]. Note the visible difference losses reported in Q/E December 2008 make to the long-term average.

Price Earnings Ratio

The chart also highlights the fact that Shiller’s CAPE is relatively low compared to the last 15 years, where the average is close to 30. The normal PE of 18.4, calculated on the last 12-month’s earnings*, is also low compared to an average of 28 for the last 15 years.

*Reporting for the December quarter is not yet completed and unreported earnings are based on S&P estimates.

As novice investors learn, it is dangerous to base buy or sell signals on a PE ratio, whether it is CAPE or regular PE based on 12-months earnings. Using CAPE, we would have sold stocks in 1996 and again in 2003, missing two of the biggest bull markets in history. And we would have most likely bought in 2008, when CAPE made a new 10-year low, right before the collapse of Lehmann Brothers.

I submit that CAPE or PE ratios are not an end in themselves, but merely a useful tool for highlighting expectations of future earnings. At present both ratios are rising, suggesting that earnings prospects are improving.

Aussie dive hurts ASX

The Australian Dollar is declining after breaking primary support at $0.885, offering a long-term target of 80 cents*. Exporters and import replacement industries on the ASX will benefit from the weaker Aussie Dollar in the long-term, but the short-term impact is negative, with overseas investors retreating from the market.

Australian Dollar/USD

* Target calculation: 0.885 – ( 0.97 – 0.885 ) = 0.80

The ASX 200 is heading for a test of support at 5200. Breach is likely and would signal a test of primary support at 5000. Declining 13-week Twiggs Money Flow indicates selling pressure. Recovery above 5400 is unlikely in the short-term, but would signal a primary advance, with a long-term target of 5800*.

ASX 200

* Target calculation: 5400 + ( 5400 – 5000 ) = 5800

Shanghai surprise

The Shanghai Composite Index found support at 2000 and is retracing to test resistance at 2100. Respect would indicate a strong primary-down trend, confirmed if support at 1950 is broken. Some may find the move surprising after weak manufacturing PMI data on Thursday, but the real estate sector surged on the back of falling money-market rates following a liquidity injection by the PBOC. A 13-week Twiggs Money Flow peak below zero would also warn of long-term selling pressure.

Shanghai Composite

* Target calculation: 2100 – ( 2250 – 2100 ) = 1950

DAX selling pressure

Germany’s DAX shows medium-term selling pressure, with bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow. Breach of support at 9400 — and the latest rising trendline — would warn of a correction to 9000. Respect of 9400 is unlikely, but would signal a primary advance to 10200*.

DAX

* Target calculation: 9800 + ( 9800 – 9400 ) = 10200

Footsie warns of correction

The FTSE 100 retreated below short-term support at 6700 after a false break above 6800, signaling a correction to test primary support at 6400. Bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow warns of long-term selling pressure. Recovery above 6800 is unlikely, but would signal a fresh advance.

FTSE 100

* Target calculation: 6800 + ( 6800 – 6400 ) = 7200

The correction we had to have

US markets were overdue for a correction and continuation of the advance for much longer would have resulted in instability, from an imbalance between buyers and sellers.

At Research & Investment we do not attempt to time entries and exits on secondary corrections. Our research shows that this is expensive and erodes performance. What we do pay a lot of attention to, on the other hand, are macro-economic and volatility indicators of market risk, exiting to cash when risks become elevated.

With a long-term view of the market, secondary fluctuations are relatively insignificant, but they do present opportunities to increase investment in the market.

The S&P 500 broke support at 1810, signaling a correction. Bearish divergence on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow strengthens the signal. Expect support at the Setember 2013 high of 1730.

S&P 500

A monthly chart places the latest breakdown in perspective. Respect of support at 1700 — and the secondary trendline — would confirm a healthy primary up-trend. A 13-week Twiggs Money Flow trough above zero would again strengthen the signal.

S&P 500

* Target calculation: 1800 + ( 1800 – 1700 ) = 1900

The VIX is rising steeply, but continues to indicate low risk and a bull market.

S&P 500 VIX

ASX 200 hanging man

The ASX 200 is testing short-term resistance at 5300. Rising 21-day Twiggs Money Flow suggests buying pressure, but the latest hanging man candlestick is bearish. Follow-through above 5320 would indicate an advance to 5400*, while reversal below 5200 would test primary support at 5050.

ASX 200

* Target calculation: 5300 + ( 5300 – 5200 ) = 5400

The ASX 200 VIX below 20 continues to reflect low market risk.

ASX 200 VIX

Sensex resistance

India’s Sensex displays strong resistance at its 2007 and 2010 high of 21000, with several failed attempts at a breakout. Reversal below 20600 would warn of another test of primary support at 20000. The bullish ascending triangle, however, suggests an advance to 22000*. Declining 13-week Twiggs Money Flow indicates medium-term selling pressure typical of a consolidation.

Sensex

* Target calculation: 21000 + ( 21000 – 20000 ) = 22000

Shanghai selling pressure

A sharp fall below zero on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow warns of selling pressure on China’s Shanghai Composite Index. Breach of support at 1950 is likely and would offer a target of 1800*.

Shanghai Composite Index

* Target calculation: 1950 – ( 2100 – 1950 ) = 1800

Michael Pettis summarizes the four challenges facing China:

  1. China is over-reliant on credit to generate growth;
  2. Attempts to boost consumption will reverse the long-standing subsidy of new investment;
  3. Attempts to resolve excess capacity also slow growth; and
  4. Unrecognized bad debt on bank balance sheets mean that growth is overstated.