US correction confirmed

The S&P 500 broke support at 1770, confirming a secondary correction. At times like this it pays to look at monthly charts to gain a long-term perspective. The first line of support is at 1700. Respect of the secondary trendline would flag a weak correction indicative of a strong up-trend. Breach of that level, however, would suggest a strong correction to 1550 and the primary trendline. The scale of the bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow, when compared to the divergence in 2007, suggests medium-term selling pressure — typical of a secondary correction rather than a (primary) reversal.

S&P 500

CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) crossed to above 20, suggesting moderate risk, but not yet cause for concern.

VIX Index

The Nasdaq 100 retreated below 3500, warning of a correction. Again, the bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow appears secondary and no threat to the primary up-trend.

Nasdaq 100

Dow scare tactics

I wish I had a dollar for every time the 1929 Dow has been superimposed over the current index. Like this effort at Zero Hedge.

Dow Jones

Why did the analyst select a period of two years? Because that is the period that fits.

Dow Jones

If we compare the period 1920 to 1933 to the last 13 years, 2001 to 2014, there is a significant difference.

Dow Jones 2001 to 2014

By 1929 the Dow had climbed roughly 400%, while by 2014 the Dow gained roughly 50% over a similar time period.

Superimposing charts one on top of the other has no sound basis in technical analysis and should be viewed as an attempt to scare the market into a sell-off. A correction may be overdue, but there are always potential buyers hoping for much lower prices.

Hat tip to John B. for sending me the Zero Hedge chart.

Are US corporate profits sustainable?

Fierce debate has been raging as to whether rising US corporate profits are sustainable or likely to shrink, leaving the market overvalued. Consideration of some of the key contributing factors will enable us to assess if and when this is likely to occur.

Interest Rates

Low interest rates are clearly boosting corporate profits. The inverse relationship is evident from the strong profits recorded in the 1950s, when corporate bond rates were lower than at present, and also the big hole in profits in the 1980s, when interest rates spiked dramatically during Paul Volcker’s reign at the Fed.

Corporate Profits and AAA Bond Yields

The outlook for inflation is muted and the rise in interest rates is likely to be gradual and over several years, rather than a sharp spike, if the Fed has its way.

Employee compensation

Employee Compensation as a percentage of Net Value Added (by Corporate Business) has fallen sharply since the GFC, boosting corporate profits. Again we can observe an inverse relationship, with corporate profits spiking when compensation rates fall, and vice versa.

Employee Compensation compared to Net Value Added

A sharp fall in unemployment would send wage rates soaring, as employers bid for scarce labor. But that is not yet on the horizon and we are likely to experience soft wage rates in the medium-term (one to two years).

Corporate Tax Rates

The third element is the effective corporate tax rate which has fallen to an historic low, post GFC. Part of this can be attributed to tax losses incurred during the GFC, used to shield current income. The effect is likely to be short-lived, causing effective tax rates to drift upwards, towards pre-GFC rates around 24%.

Effective Corporate Tax Rate

Conclusion

The sharp rise in corporate profits is unsustainable in the long-term, but adjustments in the medium-term are likely to be modest. Higher wages and interest rates will have a more significant impact in the long-term, but are only likely to occur when sound economic growth is restored — which in turn would have a compensatory effect on corporate profits.

The quality of a person’s life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor.
~ Vince Lombardi

Japan: Nikkei falls as Dollar weakens

The US Dollar is testing support at ¥102 to ¥103 against the Yen. Breach of the rising trendline would strengthen the warning from a bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Momentum. Reversal of Momentum below zero would suggest a primary down-trend. Recovery above ¥104 is less likely, but would offer a target of ¥110*.

Nikkei 225

* Target calculation: 106 + ( 106 – 102 ) = 110

A rising Dollar/Yen exchange rate would assist Japanese stocks. The Nikkei 225 is testing support at 15000 after penetrating its rising trendline. Bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow warns of selling pressure. Reversal below 15000 would indicate a strong correction, while a Twiggs Money Flow cross below zero would warn of a primary down-trend.

Nikkei 225

The hole in US employment

US employment is topical after two months of poor jobs figures. Employers added 113,000 new jobs, against an expected 185,000, last month and a low 75,000 in December. Rather than focus on monthly data, let’s take a long-term view.

The number of full-time employed as a percentage of total population [red line below] fell dramatically during the GFC, with about 1 in 10 employees losing their jobs. Since then, roughly 1 out of 4 full-time jobs lost has been restored, while the other 3 are still missing (population growth fell from 1.0% to around 0.7% post-GFC, limiting the distortion).

Employed Normally Full-time as Percentage of Population

Comparing employment levels to the 1980s is little consolation because this is skewed by the rising participation rate of women in the work-force. The pink line below shows how the number of women employed grew from under 14% of total population in the late 1960s to more than 22% prior to the GFC. The effect on total employment [green line] was dramatic, while employment of men [blue line] oscillated between 24% and 26%.

US Men & Women Employment Levels as Percentage of Population

Part-time employment — the difference between total employment [green] and full-time employed [red] below — has leveled off since 2000 at roughly 6% of the total population. So loss of full-time positions has not been compensated by a rise in casual work. Both have been affected.

US Full-time and Total Employment as Percentage of Population

The “good news” is that a soft labor market will lead to low wages growth for a considerable period, boosting corporate profits.

The bad news is that low employment levels will depress sales growth [green line]….

Total US Business Sales Percentage Growth and over GDP

And discourage new investment…..

Private NonResidential Fixed Investment

Which would harm future growth.

Gold: Bullish divergence

The Gold Bugs Index, representing un-hedged gold stocks, is often a leading indicator of spot prices. Bullish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Momentum and breach of the descending trendline suggest that a bottom is forming. Only recovery above 280 would signal a primary reversal at present, but another retracement that respects support at 190 would change that.

Gold Bugs Index

Spot gold broke resistance at $1250/ounce and we should expect retracement to test the new support level. Bullish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Momentum and breach of the descending trendline suggest that a bottom is forming. We may face an extended consolidation if falling interest rates boost gold while a stronger dollar exerts downward pressure. Failure of $1200 is now unlikely, but would warn of a decline to 1000*.

Spot Gold

* Target calculation: 1200 – ( 1400 – 1200 ) = 1000

How I Can Explain 96% Of Your Portfolio’s Returns | Kiran Pande

Great article from Kiran Pande:

Since the 1960s, we’ve been dependent on a model called CAPM (capital asset pricing model) to understand the relationship between risk and return, despite the fact that its measure of risk only explains about 70% of return. This measure, beta, makes the assumption that the entirety of every stock’s return is due to its exposure to the market. Put simply, every stock’s returns will equal a factor of the S&P 500’s returns. Thus, if a stock’s beta is 2.0, it will double the S&P 500’s returns on a bull day and double its losses on a bear day. Obviously, this assumption is wrong almost every day, but the idea is that this factor is explaining most of a stock’s returns.

All returns not explained by beta in the CAPM model are called alpha. This is traditionally accepted as the level of skill and value added by a portfolio’s manager……

There is a whole laundry list of reasons not to use CAPM, beta, and alpha but here are some highlights…

  • 70% is not 100%, not even close
  • Beta is symmetrical, risk is not… downside risk is rarely the same as upside risk.
  • Since the market index used to calculate beta (usually the S&P 500) contains stocks whose returns are supposedly dependent upon beta, these stocks’ returns are somewhat dependent upon themselves.

These counterpoints do not render beta, alpha, and CAPM useless, but we can do much better. The Fama-French Three Factor model is the answer. Rather than a single factor (market performance), the model throws a size factor and a value factor into the mix, replacing much of the nebulous alpha term. With the addition of these factors, Fama and French boast that their model explains as much as 96% of returns with quantifiable measures.

Read more at How I Can Explain 96% Of Your Portfolio's Returns | Seeking Alpha.

ASX 200 breaks support

With secondary weakness in both China and the US, the ASX 200 broke support at 5200, signaling another correction. Reversal of 21-day Twiggs Money Flow below zero suggests short-term selling pressure. Recovery above 5250 is unlikely, but would indicate a bear trap. Failure of primary support at 5050 would warn of a primary down-trend.

ASX 200

The monthly chart illustrates the importance of primary support at 5000. Breach would confirm the down-trend, suggesting a fall to the long-term trendline, around 4600.

ASX 200

* Target calculation: 5300 + ( 5300 – 5200 ) = 5400

The ASX 200 VIX rose sharply, but (below 20) continues to reflect low market risk.

ASX 200

India: SENSEX resists

India’s Sensex displays strong resistance at its 2007 and 2010 high of 21000, with several failed attempts at a breakout. Reversal below 20500 would warn of another correction to the primary trendline. Declining 13-week Twiggs Money Flow indicates medium-term selling pressure typical of a consolidation.

Sensex

* Target calculation: 21000 + ( 21000 – 20000 ) = 22000

Shanghai decline

China’s Shanghai Composite Index found short-term support at 2030 on Tuesday, but another test of the primary level at 1950 appears inevitable. Declining 13-week Twiggs Money Flow warns of selling pressure. Breach of support at 1950 would offer a target of the 2008 low at 1700*.

Shanghai Composite Index

* Target calculation: 1950 – ( 2200 – 1950 ) = 1700