Avoiding Value Traps

Thank you to the subscriber who sent the following question that I think would be of interest to most readers:

“I was wondering if you personally use any tools to help you gauge the value of individual stocks? I know that your readings show massively overpriced $SPX, but I believe their may relative values out there if we get a pullback.”

My reply starts with a caution:

The biggest challenge is to avoid value traps, where value looks deceivingly sound, but the low price reflects weaknesses that may not be evident in financial reports. The grass is often greenest over the septic tank.

The chart below shows Magellan Financial Group (MFG) ‘s rise on the ASX, with a strong balance sheet, excellent cash flows, and stellar return on equity. However, the excellent financials hid inadequate management of key person risk in a company dominated by its founders.

Magellan Financial Group (MFG)

MFG’s January 2021 break below its long-term moving average was not a buy opportunity but warned of internal upheaval:

In December 2021, Brett Cairns abruptly resigned as CEO. In the same month, St James’s Place—Magellan’s then-largest investor—also withdrew its mandate. This was followed by co-founder and CIO Hamish Douglass’ indefinite leave in February 2022, which led to his resignation from Magellan in June 2022. (Morningstar)

The Trend is Your Friend

We follow a two-step investment process:

  1. Buy on technical analysis signals. Wait for a strong uptrend before you buy, no matter how good the value appears on first inspection. The greater the apparent fundamental value, the more wary you should be. The trend is your friend.
  2. Then, do your homework on the fundamentals and decide whether to keep your position, increase it, or sell if the numbers don’t stack up.

Payback Formula

Our simple valuation formula, with adjusted EBITDA, is based on a payback period. This eliminates the need to make assumptions about the weighted average cost of capital (discount rate) and an exit value at the end of the cash flow projection.

Here is a quick summary:

  1. Calculate free cash flow by adjusting EBITDA for expected capital investment and increases in working capital needed to fund future growth.
  2. Adjust for expected corporate taxes at a suitable tax rate. Australian investors will need to consider franking credits from the dividend imputation system.
  3. Project future growth in after-tax cash flows based on past performance, capital investment, market share, and expected market growth. This may be reasonably straightforward for a company like Coca-Cola (KO) compared to a complex operation like Elon Musk’s Tesla (TSLA), which we would avoid.
  4. Sum the resulting net cash flow for a suitable payback period. We typically use a period of between 9 and 14 years, depending on the expected risk and stability of income. Cyclical businesses such as discretionary retail would be on the low end, while Australian consumer staples like Coles (COL), Woolworths (WOW), and some industrial REITS would justify a more extended payback period.
  5. Compare the resulting sum of free cash flow for the payback period to the company’s enterprise value, based on market capitalization plus debt and capitalized leases, to determine whether the stock is at a discount or premium to fair value.

The model ignores the likely exit value if you had to sell the stock at the end of the payback period, which is treated as a “margin of safety.” A more extended payback period means less margin of safety and should only be considered for stocks with lower investment risk.

You can find more details at The Patient Investor.

Conclusion

Valuations require considerable time and effort and should not be attempted by inexperienced investors. However, they can provide additional assurance when holding stocks in a strong uptrend.

Always approach any valuation exercise with a view that the stock market may not have perfect knowledge, but it knows a lot more than 99.999% of investors on the planet.

 

Weekly Stock Market Snapshot

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The Bull/Bear Market indicator remains at 60%, with the two yield-curve indicators signaling Risk-off:

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

The Fed is cutting interest rates which usually flags a bear market.

Fed Funds Target rate: Mid-point

However, financial market conditions remain ultra-easy. Also, the coincident economic index (below) held above its 2.5% threshold in November, heavy truck sales are robust, and employment in cyclical sectors is close to record highs.

Coincident Economic Activity

Stock Pricing

Stock pricing eased to the 97.90 percentile from 97.99 last Friday. The extreme reading warns that stocks remain at risk of a significant drawdown. Stock valuations, however, give no indication as to market timing:

Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent. ~ A.Gary Shilling (1986)

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

Conclusion

We are at the cusp of a bear market, with the bull-bear indicator at 60%, and stock pricing is extreme, warning of the risk of large drawdowns.

Weekly Stock Market Snapshot

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The above two dials provide a snapshot of our market view and attitude to risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The Bull/Bear Market indicator improved to 60% from 40% last week.

Heavy truck sales increased to 42,240 units in November, while October sales were revised up to 38,550 from the earlier reported 32,490.

Heavy Truck Sales

Just two of the five indicators now signal Risk-off:

Bull/Bear Market Indicator

Stock Pricing

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile.

Stock pricing continues to rise, reaching the 97.95 percentile compared to 97.83 last Friday. This warns that stocks have the potential for large drawdowns.

Stock Market Value Indicator

Conclusion

The bane of forecasting is data revisions. The collection of data for October heavy truck sales may have been impacted by hurricanes in the Southeastern region of the US.

We are again at the border between a bull and bear market, with our bull/bear indicator increasing to 60%.

However, we do not plan to increase exposure to risk assets because stock pricing remains extreme, warning of the potential for large drawdowns.

Weekly Stock Market Snapshot

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The above two dials provide a snapshot of our market view and attitude to risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The Bull/Bear Market indicator fell to 40% last Friday from 80% on November 9th.

The most recent bear signal is heavy truck sales, which plunged to a seasonally adjusted 32.5 thousand units in October 2024 from a peak of 46.1 thousand in May 2023.

Heavy Truck Sales

There are now three of five indicators signaling Risk-off:

Bull/Bear Market Indicator

Stock Pricing

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile.

Stock pricing remains in the extreme range, at the 97.83 percentile compared to 97.67 last Friday, warning that stock prices have the potential for large drawdowns.

Stock Market Value Indicator

Conclusion

We are headed for a bear market, with our allocation to risk assets declining to 40%.

Stock pricing is also extreme, warning of the potential for large drawdowns.

Weekly Market Snapshot – bear signal

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The above two dials provide a snapshot of our market view and attitude to risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The Bull/Bear Market indicator fell to 40% from 80% on Friday, November 9th.

The most recent bear signal is heavy truck sales, which plunged to a seasonally adjusted 32.5 thousand units in October 2024 from a peak of 46.1 thousand in May 2023.

Heavy Truck Sales

There are now three of five indicators signaling Risk-off:

Bull/Bear Market Indicator

Stock Pricing

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile.

Stock pricing remains in the extreme range, at the 97.67 percentile compared to 97.59 last Friday, warning that stock prices have the potential for large drawdowns.

Stock Market Value Indicator

Conclusion

We are headed for a bear market, with our allocation to risk assets declining to 40%.

Stock pricing is also extreme, warning of the potential for large drawdowns.

Bull/Bear Market Indicator

We aim to consolidate our economic and financial market analysis into a single quantifiable bull/bear market indicator.

Bull/Bear Market Indicator

We modified one of our five component market risk indicators to reduce whipsaws. Instead of the Fed Funds Rate confirmed by ISM Services Business Activity, we have created a composite indicator comprising:

  • the Fed Funds Rate;
  • the Coincident Economic Activity Index from the Philadelphia Fed;
  • the Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index; and
  • the S&P 500 with 30-week Twiggs Smoothed Momentum.

Three out of four components are required to confirm a bear market.

Our first signal was the Coincident Economic Activity Index which crossed below 2.5% annual growth for the 12 months to July, warning that the economy is slowing.

Coincident Economic Activity Index from the Philadelphia Fed

Last week, the Fed announced a 50 basis point rate cut, adding a second bear signal.

Fed Funds Target Rate (Average of High & Low)

However, the Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index below zero signals easy monetary conditions at a low -0.56.

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index

30-Week Twiggs Smoothed Momentum also signals a healthy up-trend on the S&P 500 at 12.8%.

S&P 500 with 30-week Twiggs Smoothed Momentum

The signal, therefore, remains Risk-On.

Of our four remaining risk indicators, only one signals Risk-Off.

The spread between the 10-year Treasury yield and the 3-month T-bill discount rate has been negative for 22 months. While that is a record time, it does not negate its reliability in predicting a recession within 12 months after the inversion ends.

10-Year Treasury Yield - 3-Month T-bill Discount Rate

Our second risk signal would only be triggered when the yield curve inversion ends.

Employment in cyclical industries—manufacturing, construction, transport, and warehousing—accounts for most of the jobs lost during a typical recession. Cyclical employment grew by 17,900 in August, with no sign of a recession on the horizon.

Cyclical Employment

Heavy truck sales are another reliable leading indicator of recessions. Seasonally adjusted sales of more than 42,000 units in August continue to signal a robust economy.

Heavy Truck Sales

Conclusion

Four out of five risk indicators continue to signal a bull market.

Our strategy is to divide our investment portfolio into five equal-sized buckets of 20% each. For each indicator warning of a bear market, one bucket will be switched to alternative investments—such as A-grade bonds or gold.

At present, only the 10-year/3-month Treasury yield curve warns of a bear market, so we maintain 80% exposure to stocks.

The Economics of Different | Eric Cinnamond

Eric Cinnamond on the trials and rewards of not following the herd:

I grew up in a small town outside of Louisville, Kentucky. I’m not even sure I’d call it a town – more like a zip code. We lived in a subdivision with five acre lots and gravel roads. Growing up on a gravel road had its challenges. Falling off your bike was painful! Walking or running on gravel can also be uncomfortable, with rocks often finding their way into your shoes. Dust is an issue too, along with bumpy rides and potholes. But there were some benefits.…. more

The Blue and Yellow Can | Eric Cinnamond

This excellent post from Eric Cinnamond at Palm Valley Capital sums up the challenges facing value investors in our post-QE world:

Last week my son and I went for a bike ride. Before departing, I noticed the chain on my bike was a little rusty, so I sprayed it with WD-40. My instinctive response can be traced back to my childhood and growing up in a WD-40 family. We put it on everything. In addition to our bikes, we sprayed it on window tracks, saws, locks, nuts and bolts, lawnmowers, and anything else that squeaked, rusted, or was stuck. If it was edible, we’d probably have put it on our pancakes!

When I became a small cap analyst in 1996, I was thrilled to learn WD-40 (symbol: WDFC) was a publicly traded company. In fact, it was one of the first stocks I followed and recommended. WD-40 is a classic high-quality small cap that possesses many of the attributes we seek…..

Read More

Investing in Real Estate

In Monday’s update, we compared investing in stocks to investing in financial securities and concluded that stocks offer better long-term performance. Today, we use long-term data series for US and Australian real estate to evaluate their comparative performance.

US real estate data was sourced from Prof Robert Shiller, who created the Case-Shiller Index series. The chart below shows that US home prices from 1933 to 2023, a period of ninety years, appreciated to 69.5 times their original value.

Home Price Index

Adjusting for inflation, we get real appreciation of 2.9 times.

Again, CPI seems to understate inflation. Comparing the home price index to Gold, rather than CPI, provides a more accurate measure of appreciation in real terms. Gold appreciated 94.5 times over the same period, so the home price index actually lost value.

Calculation: 69.5/94.5 = 0.735 (i.e. a 26.5% loss of value)

Comparing data sources

A second source of home price data compares median prices, based on sales of existing homes, from 1953 to 2023. That shows growth of 22 times over the past seventy years, which is close to the Home Price Index appreciation of 21.25 over the same period.

Median Home Prices, Existing Homes

Australia

Australian housing data is harder to come by but we found an excellent source of long-term median house price data in the 2007 UNSW thesis of Dr Nigel David Stapledon. Using data from within the thesis, we were able to adjust nominal house prices to reflect constant quality (house values with no improvements) below.

Median Home Prices, Existing Homes, Constant Quality

Australian house prices appreciated 191.4 times between 1933 and 2006.

Unfortunately the data ends there, so we had to calculate a weighted average of median houses for 2007 to the present.

CoreLogic kindly provided us with values for their hedonic Home Value Index (for 5 Capital Cities) which also adjusts for quality:

Property Type	31/01/2007	31/07/2023
Houses		$399,182	$891,747

The gain of 2.23 is slightly higher than the 2.14 calculated from weighted average data for the 8 capital cities provided by the ABS.

Median Home Prices, Weighted Average of 8 Capital Cities

We opted for the higher figure from CoreLogic as likely to be more in line with the earlier Stapledon data. That gives a total nominal gain, adjusted for quality, of 426.8 for the ninety years from 1933 to 2023.

The price of Gold fines was fixed at £6-3/9 per troy ounce fine according to the Sydney Morning Herald on 2 January 1933, that converts to 12.375 Australian Dollars. Total gain for Gold in Australian Dollars over the past ninety years is therefore 232.9 times (A$2881.90/12.375).

We calculate the real gain for Australian house prices as 1.83 times over the past ninety years (426.8/232.9).

Conclusion

The US Home Price Index lost 26.5% in real terms, over the past ninety years (1933 – 2023), when compared to Gold.

The S&P 500 appreciated 6.8 times over the past ninety years when measured against Gold, and 9.7 times compared to US real estate (Home Price Index).

Using Gold as the benchmark, we conclude that Australian real estate prices appreciated faster than US real estate over the past ninety years, growing 1.83 times in real terms, whereas the US depreciated to 0.735 of its original real value.

We suspect the difference is largely due to the substantial fall in US real estate values after the 2008 sub-prime crisis, whereas Australian home prices continued to grow. We expect that performance of the two will converge in the long-term.

Lastly, when measured against Gold, US stocks outperformed Australian real estate. The S&P 500 grew 3.7 times against Australian home prices, in real terms, over the past ninety years.

This does not mean that we should ignore real estate as an investment medium. But a portfolio concentrated in real estate, without diversification into stocks and precious metals, could underperform in the long-term.

Acknowledgements