Category: Gold & Commodities

Posted on

Crude oil and commodities threaten breakout

Brent crude has strengthened despite Libya coming back on-stream. Heightened tensions with Iran have increased support above $100/barrel. Breakout above $115 would signal the start of a new up-trend — not a good sign for the global economy. In the long term, recovery above $125 would offer a target of $150*.

ICE Brent Afternoon Markers

* Target calculation: 125 + ( 125 – 100 ) = 150

The CRB Commodities Index has also found support: at 295. Penetration of the descending trendline would suggest that a base is forming, while recovery above 325 would indicate a fresh primary advance.

CRB Commodities Index

* Target calculation: 325 + ( 325 – 295 ) = 355

Posted on

Spot gold finds support

Spot gold found support at $1500/ounce. Failure of this level would confirm a primary down-trend. Breach of the descending trendline would indicate that a base is forming, while recovery above $1800 would indicate a fresh primary advance to $2300*. We are unlikely to witness another bull-trend, however, unless the Fed introduces QE3.

Spot Gold

* Target calculation: 1900 + ( 1900 – 1500 ) = 2300

Posted on

Dollar breakout causes gold tremors

The Dollar Index broke through resistance at 80.00, signaling a primary advance to 85.00. Rising 63-day Twiggs Momentum indicates a strong up-trend.

Dollar Index

* Target calculation: 80 + ( 80 – 75 ) = 85

The stronger dollar caused spot gold to weaken, testing the band of support between $1550 and $1600/ounce.

Spot Gold

Gold is also testing the lower trend channel on the weekly chart. Cross of 63-day Twiggs Momentum below zero warns of a trend reversal. Failure of support at $1550 would confirm a primary down-trend.

Spot Gold Weekly

* Target calculation: 1600 – ( 1800 – 1600 ) = 1400

CRB Commodities Index is similarly testing support at 292. Breakout would offer a target of 265*.

CRB Commodities Index

* Target calculation: 295 – ( 325 – 295 ) = 265

Brent Crude is testing medium-term support at $105/barrel. Failure would indicate a test of the lower trend channel.

ICE Brent Afternoon Markers

Some readers questioned why gold and stocks are falling simultaneously — one normally rises when the other falls. A possible explanation is that expectation of quantitative easing, both from the Fed and ECB, has been supporting both markets. As prospects of QE recede, inflation forecasts will be lowered and demand for inflation-hedge assets (stocks and commodities) will fade. We should see a corresponding rise in bond prices (and falling yields) as a result.

Posted on

Safe haven demand for dollar and gold eases

The Dollar Index is testing support at 78.00. Narrow consolidation above the support level indicates weakness. Recovery above 79.00 would relieve this, while failure of support would warn of another test of primary support at 75.00.  Rising 63-day Twiggs Momentum, well above zero, however, suggests continuation of the up-trend.

Dollar Index

* Target calculation: 80 + ( 80 – 75 ) = 85

Spot gold is also weak as safe haven demand for both the yellow metal and the dollar has eased. Reversal below $1670 would signal another test of primary support at $1600. Declining 63-day Twiggs Momentum suggests further weakness but the long-term outlook remains bullish with the indicator comfortably above the zero line.

Spot Gold

* Target calculation: 1800 + ( 1800 – 1700 ) = 1900

Increased tensions with Iran are supporting the price of Brent Crude above $105/barrel. Narrow oscillation of 63-day Twiggs Momentum around the zero line indicates uncertainty. Failure of support (and respect of the descending trendline) would indicate another primary decline with a target of $85*. Breach of primary support at $99 would confirm.

ICE Brent Crude Afternoon Markers

* Target calculation: 100 – ( 115 – 100 ) = 85

The CRB Commodities Index respected its descending trendline, suggesting a primary decline to $265*. Follow-through below short-term support at $305 would strengthen the signal, while breach of primary support at $295 would confirm. The Aussie Dollar and Canada’s Loonie both closely follow commodity prices and can be expected to follow the CRB index lower.

CRB Commodities Index

* Target calculation: 295 – ( 325 – 295 ) = 265

Posted on

Heard on the Street: Australia’s Juggling Act – WSJ.com

Economists expect 2012 will see a slowdown in the economy of China, Australia’s biggest trading partner. China’s gross domestic product growth could slip to around 8% from more than 9% this year, which will lead to lower demand for commodities. Already, the Reserve Bank of Australia’s index of commodity prices—a weighted basket of Australia’s resource sector exports—has fallen sharply this year. The central bank says the economy’s resources-led surplus may have hit its peak and could decline “somewhat” from here.

via Heard on the Street: Australia’s Juggling Act – WSJ.com.

Posted on

ETF Investors Go for Gold

BlackRock, the nation’s largest exchange-traded fund purveyor, said Wednesday that exchange-traded funds that invest in gold generated $4.8 billion in net new assets in November. That meant gold outperformed any other category of ETF, including fund that invest in bonds or stocks…….The rush to gold reflected increasing investor concern that gold is a safer place to put money than currencies or sovereign debt, given the European debt crisis and the high deficit and debt levels in the United States, according to Kevin Feldman, managing director for the iShares line of exchange-traded products from BlackRock.

via ETF Investors Go for Gold.

Posted on

The Oil Drum | Is It Really Possible to Decouple GDP Growth from Energy Growth?

Prior to 2000, world real GDP (based on USDA Economic Research Institute data) was indeed growing faster than energy use, as measured by BP Statistical Data…… Since 2000, energy use has grown approximately as fast as world real GDP–increases for both have averaged about 2.5% per year growth. This is not what we have been told to expect.

Why should this “efficiency gain” go away after 2000? Many economists are concerned about energy intensity of GDP and like to publicize the fact that for their country, GDP is rising faster than energy consumption. These indications can be deceiving, however. It is easy to reduce the energy intensity of GDP for an individual country by moving the more energy-intensive manufacturing to a country with higher energy intensity of GDP.

What happens when this shell game is over? In total, is the growth in world GDP any less energy intense? The answer since 2000 seems to be “No”.

It seems to me that at least part of the issue is declining energy return on energy invested (EROI)–we are using an increasing share of energy consumption just to extract and process the energy we use–for example, in “fracking” and in deep water drilling. This higher energy cost is acting to offset efficiency gains.

via The Oil Drum | Is It Really Possible to Decouple GDP Growth from Energy Growth?.

Powered by WordPress / WordPress Maintenance Service By Website Helper