Rogoff: The Unstarvable Beast | Business Insider

Kenneth Rogoff, professor of economics at Harvard University, writes:

As US President in the 1980’s, the conservative icon Ronald Reagan described his approach to fiscal policy as “starve the beast”: cutting taxes will eventually force people to accept less government spending. In many ways, his approach was a great success. But government spending has continued to grow, because voters still want the services that government provides. Today, it is clear that reining in government also means finding ways to shape incentives so that innovation in government keeps pace with innovation in other service sectors….

Read more at Rogoff: The Unstarvable Beast – Business Insider.

Why the fiscal cliff deal offers little to celebrate | Quartz

Gwynn Guilford writes:

Most immediately worrisome is that [lawmakers] ……let a cut in the payroll tax (which pays for social security) expire. Though doing so will close the 2013 budget deficit by some $126 billion, it means that 160 million Americans — including two-thirds of the lowest quintile of earners — will see around $600-$2,000 skimmed off their paychecks this year. That exacerbates a trend of falling wages in the past few years, and is particularly worrying given that consumer spending is a critical engine of the US economic recovery. In fact, Goldman Sachs’ Jan Hatzius expects that the expired payroll tax cut alone will drain 0.6% off 2013 GDP growth, in the form of reduced consumption.

Read more at Why the fiscal cliff deal offers little to celebrate – Quartz.

China: Easing one-child policy may not slow aging population [video]

China could ease its one-child policy to address a rapidly aging population — but as Jane Lee reports, rules aren’t the only thing stopping Chinese families from expanding.

http://youtu.be/0XAYxilsEJc

Congress Passes Fiscal Cliff Deal – WSJ.com

WSJ writes that Congress passed a compromise bill to avert the fiscal cliff:

The bill …… was passed over opposition from conservative Republicans in the House who objected to the fact that it contained no long-term spending cuts of any significance. Both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives approved a bipartisan deal to block most impending tax increases and postpone spending cuts. The WSJ’s Mark Cranfield explains what the deal means for the U.S. deficit. The House voted 257-167, with 172 Democrats joining 85 Republicans in supporting the measure. Voting against the bill were 151 Republicans, and the GOP leadership split over the issue: House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R., Va.) voted against it, while House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) voted for it. Also supporting the bill was Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) the GOP vice presidential nominee who has been an ardent opponent of increasing taxes.

Read more at Congress Passes Fiscal Cliff Deal – WSJ.com.

Disappointing fiscal cliff compromise

Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R, Ky) brokered a deal that is likely to be approved by the Senate early Tuesday before being put to a vote in the House later in the day. The WSJ writes:

By waiting until the last minute, and reaching a deal on a much smaller scale than either side once envisioned, Washington also deferred many of its thorniest questions for perhaps as little as a few weeks. In late February of early March, the Treasury Department will run out of extraordinary measures to deal with the government’s borrowing limit — which it reached on Monday — and Congress would need to approve an increase. The delay in the spending cuts will run out about the same time. In effect, Congress has delayed the fiscal cliff by erecting a new and potentially more dangerous one.

Read more at The Fiscal Cliff – WSJ.com.

How the Welfare State Traps the Poor in Dependency, the British Version « International Liberty

Dan Mitchell describes how withdrawal of welfare benefits as your income rises can create a tax cliff that discourages the unemployed from seeking more work.

A graphic from British newspaper The Spectator gives this example:

John 21, works 25 hours per week at a gross wage of £5.70 per hour.
Of which 63p in tax/National Insurance and £4.18 in benefits (housing and council tax) is withdrawn.
Net income from work: 89p per hour.
84% of wage is lost in tax and benefit withdrawal!

Read more at How the Welfare State Traps the Poor in Dependency, the British Version « International Liberty.

Cutting taxes is a largely ineffective strategy for attracting foreign investment | EUROPP

Aidan Regan writes:

The Irish have the second best trade surplus in the eurozone, and productivity per worker is three times higher than Germany….. The truth of this fairy-tale is that US multinational corporations are engaged in transfer pricing. They locate profits in Ireland to take advantage of the low corporate tax regime.

Read more at Cutting taxes is a largely ineffective strategy for attracting foreign investment. | EUROPP.

Australia: Negative gearing and its impact on the housing market | RP Data Research Blog

Cameron Kusher extends the following argument in favor of negative gearing:

Many in favour of removing negative gearing from property say that it should occur due to the fact that housing is an unproductive asset class. My argument is that given that housing provides shelter, if investors don’t purchase these assets, it would then be the responsibility of the Government to provide this shelter. Ultimately, that would mean that anyone that pays taxes would be funding housing for those who can’t afford it themselves.

What happened to individuals being responsible for their own housing? A large part of rental demand is due to poor housing affordability. If we made housing more affordable, the rental market would shrink.

Kusher highlights that in September 1985 the government quarantined negative gearing interest expenses on new transactions.

The reason why negative gearing was reinstated in September 1987 was that it was proclaimed that rents rose sharply on the back of a fall in housing market investment.

The following chart shows that rental growth accelerated between September 1985 and September 1987:
Rental Growth

But no explanation is given for the earlier peak in rental growth rates — 13% in 1982 — prior to restrictions on negative gearing.

And what is not mentioned is that interest rates were rising. Standard variable bank mortgage rates peaked at 15.5% in 1986/1987. That would account for any decline in new housing investment, even though this is not evident from investor finance commitments.

via Negative gearing and its impact on the housing market | RP Data Research Blog.

Productivity: Ireland leads the way

Ireland now leads the United States in labor productivity as measured by GDP (converted to USD after adjusting for purchasing power parity) to hours worked by the workforce. Mark Cassidy writes on Ireland’s strong productivity growth during the 1990s:

Strong productivity growth during this period was largely driven by substantial foreign direct investment inflows from the United States and sectoral change in industry — i.e. a continuing shift of capital and labour from agriculture and relatively low productivity manufacturing towards high-technology sectors including chemicals and ICT sectors — and was facilitated by macro and micro-economic reforms implemented since the late 1980s, favourable exchange rate and international economic developments, increased European integration and the availability of a young, relatively well-educated workforce.

Two factors stand out:

  1. Ireland joined the euro-zone on its official launch in January 1999;
  2. The Irish government is committed to a 12.5% corporate tax regime, among the lowest in Europe.

Removal of trade barriers and favorable tax rates attracted large investment in high-tech manufacturing, primarily from the United States.

Belgium ranked as the 3rd most productive country in the world?

Belgium scores highly on international productivity rankings, which compare GDP (converted to USD after adjusting for purchasing power parity) to hours worked by the workforce. But results can be deceiving. Amcham Belgium writes:

Although Belgium has a high productivity score, it might not be all good news. Firstly, the results could be influenced by the fact that only 34.5% of its employable population aged 55 to 65 are actually working ……… Secondly, Belgian salaries are on average 11% higher than those of neighboring countries (the Netherlands, Germany and France)…..

Belgium may rank high on GDP per hour worked but slips down the rankings when measured on GDP per capita because of its low labor participation rate which imposes a high social cost on the country. That is why it is important not to use just one measure when assessing productivity.
Read more at Belgium ranked as the 3rd most productive country in the world.