ASX Weekly Market Indicators

Bull-Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The ASX Bull-Bear Market indicator is at 46%, signaling a bear market. Three of the six leading indicators signal risk-off, while the US bull-bear index remains at 40% (with a 40% weighting).

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

The ASX 200 Financials Index (XFJ) rallied to above its 50-week weighted moving average, but remains in a downtrend unless there is a breakout above the recent high at 9250.
ASX 200 Financials Index

Stock Pricing

ASX stock pricing rose to 73.86 percent, compared to 67.85 two weeks ago and a high of 85.83 in February.

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

Conclusion

The ASX bull-bear indicator signals a bear market, while the risk of a significant drawdown remains high.

Acknowledgments

Blow-off or buy the dip?

President Charles de Gaulle once equated being an ally of the United States to sharing a lifeboat with an elephant. The last month has been like sharing a lifeboat with an elephant on ketamine.

Gold epitomizes recent volatility in financial markets. It spiked up to $3,500 per ounce on President Trump’s threat to fire Fed chair Jerome Powell and then plunged when Treasury Secretary Bessent and later Trump moved to placate markets.

Spot Gold

Wall Street flipped to buy mode on Tuesday, without any fresh criticism of U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell or flip-flops on tariffs from President Donald Trump to disquiet markets again. Indexes reversed Monday’s tumble, hitting session highs following a report that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had said a tariff standoff with China was unsustainable and he expected the situation to de-escalate, raising hopes a bit on U.S. trade negotiations. (Reuters)

Is this a blow-off?

No. The Trend Index shows a sharp rise in volatility since April 9, but these are short-term moves rather than the culmination of a long-term acceleration.

Blow-offs typically occur after a feedback loop in which rising prices attract more buyers, who drive up prices, attracting more buyers. The cycle repeats, with the trend growing increasingly steeper until the market reaches saturation point, when new buyers dry up and the market reverses in a sharp blow-off top.

Similar feedback loops occur in nature–from bushfires and housefires to locust swarms and cyclones–where they start slowly and accelerate into a massive culmination. A bushfire runs out of dry brush, a fire in a room runs out of oxygen, a locust swarm runs out of food, and a cyclone runs out of moist air when it reaches land. All end similarly: expanding rapidly until they consume all available fuel, then suddenly dying.

The weekly chart below shows a typical stock blow-off, experienced by vaccine specialist Moderna (MRNA) during the 2020-2021 COVID pandemic.

Moderna (MRNA)

MRNA gained 2500% in less than two years before the accelerating uptrend ended suddenly, with a shooting star reversal at $500. The stock had more than doubled in the preceding four weeks, with the weekly Trend Index spiking to a high of 5.

In comparison, gold gained 75% over the past 14 months, accelerating to a 16% gain in the past five weeks, with the Trend Index peaking at a high of 1.

Weekly Gold Chart

Conclusion

There is no evidence that rising demand for gold is approaching a culmination. Private demand is growing, and central banks are rapidly converting reserves to gold. Demand is fueled by global uncertainty, and there is no end in sight.

The current pull-back is a much-needed correction after a steep advance. We expect strong support around $3,150 per ounce and will buy the dip. Our long-term target remains $4,000 within the next six months.

Gold bear trap

Gold briefly broke support at $3,000 per ounce, threatening a correction to test the support band between $2,800 and $2,850. However, strong buying drove the precious metal above the support level, displaying a long tail on today’s candlestick. A breakout above $3,050 would complete a bear trap reversal, signaling a rally to $3,150.

Spot Gold

According to the IMF, gold increased to 21% of official currency reserves. However, gold reserves are far below the 60% to 70% required for a viable gold-backed financial system, as in the 1960s.

Official Gold Reserves

China’s and Saudi Arabia’s gold reserves are climbing steeply, while Western central bank holdings remain below 22,000 tonnes.

Increase in Rest-of-World (China) Gold Reserves

China’s actual reserves are likely higher than the official IMF figures. Jan Nieuwenhuijs at The Gold Observer estimates that China purchased 570 tonnes of gold through unofficial channels last year, with their total holdings close to 5,000 tonnes compared to the 2,280 tonnes in official figures.

Conclusion

We are long-term bullish on gold while the dollar-based global financial system weakens due to excessive government debt and steep fiscal deficits.

The false break below $3,000 warns of a bear trap. Recovery above $3,050 per ounce would confirm a short-term target of $3,150.

Acknowledgments

ASX Weekly Market Snapshot

Bull-Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The ASX Bull-Bear Market indicator fell to 46%. Three of the six leading indicators continue to signal risk-off, but the US bull-bear index (a 40% weighting) declined to 40%.

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

Stock Pricing

ASX stock pricing declined to the 69.61 percentile from a high of 85.83 in February.

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

Conclusion

The ASX bull-bear indicator declined to 46%, warning of a bear market, while the risk of a significant drawdown remains high.

Acknowledgments

US Weekly Market Snapshot

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

Our Bull/Bear Market indicator has fallen to 40%, with three of the five leading indicators now signaling risk-off:

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

Heavy truck sales fell to 33.6K units in March, with the 3-month moving average declining more than 15% from its July 2023 high, warning of a recession.

Heavy Truck Sales (Units)

Stock Pricing

Stock pricing eased slightly to 95.09 from a high of the 97.79 percentile six weeks ago. The extreme reading warns that stocks are at risk of a significant drawdown.

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

Conclusion

We are now in a bear market, with the bull-bear indicator falling to 40%. Stock pricing remains extreme, warning of the risk of a significant drawdown.

Acknowledgments

Give War a Chance | Edward Luttwak

UN Peacekeepers in Bosnia

UN soldiers at a NATO base near Brcko, Bosnia, March 1998 | Juergen Schwarz, Reuters

This 1999 opinion in Foreign Affairs magazine, by Edward N. Luttwak, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, is relevant to today’s conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza:

An unpleasant truth often overlooked is that although war is a great evil, it does have a great virtue: it can resolve political conflicts and lead to peace. This can happen when all belligerents become exhausted or when one wins decisively….

A cease-fire tends to arrest war-induced exhaustion and lets belligerents reconstitute and rearm their forces. It intensifies and prolongs the struggle once the cease-fire ends—and it does usually end….

Read more at Foreign Affairs

ASX Weekly Market Snapshot

Bull-Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

The ASX Bull-Bear Market indicator remains at 54%, with three of six leading indicators signaling risk-off, while the US bull-bear index (a 40% weighting) is at 60%:

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

The ASX 200 continues in a strong downtrend relative to the gold price in Australian Dollars.

ASX 200 Index Relative to Gold in AUD

The ASX 200 Financials Index (XFJ) is retracing to test resistance at 8500, but remains in a primary downtrend.

ASX 200 Financials Index

Stock Pricing

ASX stock pricing increased to the 76.18 percentile compared to 74.05 two weeks ago, and a high of 85.83 in February.

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

Conclusion

The ASX bull-bear indicator at 54% indicates a mild bear market.

We are entering a bear market, and the risk of a significant drawdown is high.

Acknowledgments

US Weekly Market Snapshot

Bull/Bear Market Indicator
Stock Market Pricing Indicator

The dial on the left indicates bull or bear market status, while the one on the right reflects stock market drawdown risk.

Bull/Bear Market

Our Bull/Bear Market indicator is unchanged at 60%, with two of the five leading indicators signaling risk-off:

Bull-Bear Market Indicator

We replaced the Coincident Economic Activity Index with Current Economic Conditions from the University of Michigan’s monthly consumer survey. The UOM index offers earlier recession warnings—when the 3-month moving average crosses below 100—and more timely updates.

University of Michigan: Current Economic Conditions

The current reading of 68.20 is a strong bear signal. The Fed Funds target rate is also in a bear cycle, but the two require confirmation from one of the following two indicators:

If the Chicago Fed Financial National Conditions Index rises above -0.40.

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index

Or the S&P 500 30-week Smoothed Momentum crosses below zero.

S&P 500

Stock Pricing

Stock pricing eased slightly to the 95.67th percentile from a high of 97.79 six weeks ago. However, the extreme reading still warns that stocks are at risk of a significant drawdown.

Stock Market Value Indicator

The Stock Pricing indicator compares stock prices to long-term sales, earnings, and economic output to gauge market risk. We use z-scores to measure each indicator’s current position relative to its history, with the result expressed in standard deviations from the mean. We then calculate an average for the five readings and convert that to a percentile. The higher that stock market pricing is relative to its historical mean, the greater the risk of a sharp drawdown.

 

Conclusion

There’s little change this week. We are close to a bear market, with the bull-bear indicator at 60%. Stock pricing is still extreme, highlighting the risk of a significant drawdown.

Acknowledgments

Inflation, the third certainty

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes. ~ Benjamin Franklin

That may have been true in 1789, but since President Richard Nixon ended the dollar’s convertibility to gold in 1971, we live with a third certainty: inflation.

Ending convertibility to gold lifted the restraint on central banks to limit the creation of new money; otherwise, they would face a run on their gold reserves (or USD reserves linked to gold).

This resulted in a rapid decline in the dollar’s value. Today, the dollar has the same purchasing power as 9.2 US cents in 1960.

Decline of Dollar Purchasing Power

There have still been brief periods of deflation, most notably in 2009 during the global financial crisis.

Deflation in 2009

But central banks are well aware of the danger. The 1929 Wall Street crash and subsequent banking crisis caused a deflationary spiral as money in circulation contracted.

Deflation in 1930s

Whenever prices threaten to deflate, the Fed swiftly expands the money supply to counter the contraction. The graph below shows the rapid expansion of the monetary base relative to GDP after the 2008 global financial crisis and during the 2020 COVID pandemic.

Monetary Base to GDP

While inflation is inevitable, its rate varies and is determined by various factors, including money supply growth, wage rates, oil prices, and other external shocks.

The globalization of international trade introduced a new form of deflationary supply shock, especially after China joined the WTO in 2000 and was granted favored nation status by the US Congress. Low wages, industrial subsidies, and low health and environmental standards enabled the new entrant to undercut industry in developed economies, flooding international markets with low-priced manufactured goods.

Central banks pushed back with fiscal deficits and monetary expansion to soften the impact on their economies. Unfortunately, the stimulus flowed to the top 10% while the bottom half bore the costs.

Globalization in reverse

We now face a new challenge: the reversal of globalization through increased tariffs and other trade barriers.

According to Stephen Mirran, Donald Trump’s chief economic adviser, tariffs on imports will offer three main benefits. First, tariffs are a new source of tax revenue, enabling Congress to reduce corporate and individual tax rates and stimulate economic growth. Second, tariffs increase the cost of imports and encourage investment in domestic industries while imports decline. Third, the real clincher is that foreign exporters are forced to absorb the cost of the tariff, not the US taxpayer.

It doesn’t quite work like that.

The first benefit will only occur if trading partners don’t retaliate with their own tariffs. Second, imports will only decline if the dollar doesn’t strengthen as it did in 2018.

Chinese Yuan USD

Third, foreign exporters will only bear the cost of the tariff if the dollar strengthens and imports don’t decline—the last two benefits conflict. The more imports decline, the more the US consumer will bear the cost of tariffs instead of foreign exporters.

Why we are concerned about inflation

A Weak Dollar

The dollar has weakened considerably since the announcement of tariffs. The administration’s on-again-off-again tariff policies have raised uncertainty and reduced growth expectations, causing a 50-basis-point fall in the 10-year Treasury yield and a similar decline in the Dollar Index.

The weaker dollar should ensure that US consumers bear the cost of the tariffs, and even the prices of goods not subject to tariffs will rise.

Trade War

Retaliatory tariffs by trading partners are likely to increase the cost of imported goods to US consumers, especially if the dollar weakens.

The best way to minimize retaliation would be to implement tariffs gradually and quietly, or pretty much the opposite of what has happened so far. ~ Joseph Calhoun

Higher Domestic Prices

US consumers will also likely pay higher prices to domestic producers who would be uncompetitive without the tariffs.

Recession

A trade war would likely cause a recession, pushing the Fed to cut rates while falling tax receipts would increase the fiscal deficit. A recession would initially ease inflation, but increased deficits and stimulatory measures by the Fed would likely increase inflationary pressure over time.

Fiscal Dominance

The dollar is weakening as its status as the global reserve currency diminishes, as evidenced by the soaring gold price.

Spot Gold

Foreign purchases of US Treasuries are declining as a percentage of GDP, which has increased upward pressure on yields.

Federal Debt to GDP: Percentage of Foreign Investors

The Fed will likely attempt to suppress long-term rates by opening up new sources of demand for Treasuries. While further Treasury purchases (QE) by the Fed are unlikely, they may attempt to achieve a similar result by relaxing the supplementary leverage requirement for Treasuries. With no SLR constraint, commercial banks can leverage Treasury purchases to infinity. This would make UST an attractive investment for commercial banks and has been done before, in 2008, to boost commercial bank support for Treasury markets.

“We might actually pull treasury bill yields down by 30 to 70 basis points. Every basis point is a billion dollars a year.” ~ Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent

After the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) debacle, commercial bank demand will likely focus on T-bills without much impact on the long end of the yield curve.

Bank purchases will effectively swap bank reserves at the Fed for T-bills to be held on their balance sheets, cutting out the Fed as the middleman. With QE, the Fed typically pays for Treasuries purchased by crediting banks with increased reserves, which are a liability of the Fed, and holding the securities as an asset on their balance sheet.

This does not expand the money supply and is not in itself inflationary. However, increased reliance on the Fed and commercial banks to fund the government increases the risk of fiscal dominance.

Fiscal dominance is when a country’s debt and deficit are so high that monetary policy focuses on keeping the government solvent instead of controlling inflation. ~ Simplicable

Inflation: A Soft Default

The $36 trillion in US federal debt is too large to be repaid.

Federal Debt

Debt reduction would require reversing the current fiscal deficits of $1.5 to $2.0 trillion to a surplus of at least $1.0 trillion. The shock to the economy would cause a decades-long recession similar to the UK after WWII.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on reducing the deficit:

I was with one of the congressional budget committees two weeks ago, and they really want to cut this fast. And I said, you do realize every 300 billion we cut is about a percentage GDP, so you, we are trying to land the plane.

Long-term austerity is most unlikely, and the only viable alternative is to inflate the debt away, boosting nominal GDP to the point that the debt ratio to GDP declines to about half its current level.

Federal Debt to GDP

Conclusion

China and the EU, the US’s two biggest trading partners, will likely retaliate if it increases import tariffs. They will also likely withdraw investments from US financial markets over time. This is expected to drive up inflation and long-term interest rates, leaving the Fed with a stark choice. Fiscal dominance means that the solvency of the Treasury is likely to be prioritized over inflation. Especially after May 2026, when the current Fed chair’s term ends, he will likely be replaced with a more pliant Trump appointment.

Inflation is inevitable. Buy gold and defensive stocks on reasonable earnings multiples. Avoid high-multiple growth stocks and long-term Treasuries.

Acknowledgments

Fed sits tight as economic outlook darkens

The Fed has kept the funds rate steady at 4.25% to 4.5% since December. The threat of a trade war and the increased risk of a sharp price jump have ensured Fed caution over further rate cuts. The FOMC dot plot below shows four participants expect no cuts this year, another four expect one cut of 25 basis points, and eight more expect a total of 50 basis points.

FOMC Dot Plot

FOMC projections identify rising uncertainty over GDP growth and greater risk of an undershoot.

FOMC: GDP Risk

Consumer expectations of inflation soared in the March University of Michigan survey, with the median price increase in the next year jumping to 4.9%.

University of Michigan: 1-Year Inflation Expectations

Expectations of future conditions fell sharply to 54.2.

University of Michigan: Consumer Expectations

Stocks were buoyed by Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s view that tariff-driven inflation will be “transitory” and largely confined to this year. (Reuters)

The Dow Industrial Average rallied to test resistance at the former primary support level of 42,000.

Dow Jones Industrial Average

The S&P 500 recovered some ground but encountered resistance at 5700, below the former primary support level.

S&P 500

Long-term Treasury yields benefited from the outflow from equity markets in February and March, with the 10-year testing support at 4.1% before increasing to 4.25%. A further fall in stocks would likely cause a short-term softening of UST yields.

10-Year Treasury Yield

Upward pressure on US Treasury yields will likely come from doubts over the current administration’s economic strategy and concerns over a debt-ceiling stoush. US credit default swap spreads (CDS) have increased by 200% since December.

United States Treasury: 1-Year Credit Default Swaps

A sharp upturn in the Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index warns of tightening financial conditions, with credit spreads widening.

Chicago Fed National Financial Conditions Index

The Fed confirmed they will reduce the monthly redemption cap on Treasury securities from $25 billion to $5 billion. This will slow the withdrawal of liquidity from the Treasury market through the QT program.

Conclusion

The Treasury market has shown that it is still vulnerable to thin demand and requires Fed support to maintain liquidity in the long-term end of the curve. The Fed has been forced to cut monthly QT for Treasury securities to $5 billion. At the new rate, it would take the Fed more than 70 years to shed its present holdings of $4.24 trillion.

Fed Security Holdings

Stocks are rallying but are unlikely to reverse the recent bear market signal.

Acknowledgments