Fed NGDP targeting would greatly increase global financial stability | Market Monetarist

Lars Christensen describes how NGDP targeting would help the global economy withstand shocks like another eurozone crisis:

Lets look at two different hypothetical US monetary policy settings. First what we could call an ‘adaptive’ monetary policy rule and second on a strict NGDP targeting rule.

‘Adaptive’ monetary policy – a recipe for disaster

By an adaptive monetary policy I mean a policy where the central bank will allow ‘outside’ factors to determine or at least greatly influence US monetary conditions and hence the Fed would not offset shocks to money velocity…..

In that sense under an ‘adaptive’ monetary policy the Fed is effective[ly] allowing external financial shocks to become a tightening of US monetary conditions. The consequence every time that this is happening is not only a negative shock to US economic activity, but also increased financial distress – as in 2008 and 2011.

NGDP targeting greatly increases global financial stability

If the Fed on the other hand pursues a strict NGDP level targeting regime the story is very different.

Lets again take the case of an European sovereign default. The shock again – initially – makes investors run for safe assets. That is causing the US dollar to strengthen, which is pushing down US money velocity (money demand is increasing relative to the money supply). However, as the Fed is operating a strict NGDP targeting regime it would ‘automatically’ offset the decrease in velocity by increasing the money base (and indirectly the money supply) to keep NGDP expectations ‘on track’. Under a futures based NGDP targeting regime this would be completely automatic and ‘market determined’.

Hence, a financial shock from an euro zone sovereign default would leave no major impact on US NGDP and therefore likely not on US prices and real economic activity…..

Read more at Fed NGDP targeting would greatly increase global financial stability | The Market Monetarist.

Asia finds relief

Japan found relief from the overnight selling. Dow Jones Japan Index is back testing resistance at 70. Breakout would signal continuation of the primary advance.

Dow Jones Japan Index

Dow Jones Hong Kong Index is undergoing a correction but found support at yesterday’s low of 464.
Hang Seng Index

India is falling today. The Sensex is likely to re-test support at 18800. Breakout above 20200 would signal a primary advance to 21000*, but bearish divergence on 13-week Twiggs Money Flow continues to warn of selling pressure. Reversal below 19000 would warn of a correction to the primary trendline at 18000. Failure of 18800 would confirm.

Sensex Index

* Target calculation: 20 + ( 20 – 19 ) = 21

China is neutral Tuesday, but the Shanghai Composite broke support at 2250 on Monday, warning of a down-swing to primary support at 1950/2000.
Shanghai Composite Index

* Target calculation: 2450 + ( 2450 – 2250 ) = 2650

S&P 500 and Europe: Likely to blow over

Question: Is the outcry in Europe going to tip the S&P 500 into a correction?

Answer: The outcome is uncertain. While there is a strong case for giving depositors and bondholders a haircut, the timing — so soon after an inconclusive Italian election — could not be worse. But let’s see what the market are saying….

Longish tail on the S&P 500 shows buying support at the close. Mild bearish divergence (mild because TMF has leveled out rather than falling sharply) on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow indicates medium-term selling pressure. We are likely to see retracement to the first line of support — at the previous high of 1525/1530 — but only breach of this level and the rising trendline would warn of a correction. Target for the current advance is 1600*.

S&P 500 Index

* Target calculation: 1525 + ( 1525 – 1475 ) = 1575

VIX Volatility Index remains low — near its 2005 lows at 0.10. Breakout above 0.20 would be a warn of rising uncertainty.
VIX Index
The FTSE 100 exhibits an even longer tail, but bearish divergence on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow also indicates medium-term selling pressure. Reversal below the latest rising trendline (6400) would warn of a correction, while breakout above 6550 would continue the advance to 6800*.
FTSE 100 Index

* Target calculation: 6400 + ( 6400 – 6000 ) = 6800

The DAX showed even greater resilience, closing back above 8000. Follow-through above 8100 would signal a fresh primary advance. Rising 21-day Twiggs Money Flow indicates medium-term buying pressure.
DAX Index

Conclusion

There is bound to be some turbulence but markets are showing resilience and the storm is likely to blow over.

ASIC: High-frequency trading taskforce—Key findings

Findings of the recent ASIC investigation into dark liquidity and high-frequency trading.

The high-frequency trading taskforce found that:

(a) some of the commonly held negative perceptions about high-frequency trading are not supported by our analysis of Australian markets—for example:

(i) that high-frequency traders exhibit unacceptably high order-to-trade ratios. Increases in order-to-trade ratios in Australia have been moderate compared with overseas markets, and other algorithmic traders operate at similar levels; and
(ii) that high-frequency traders’ holding times are often a matter of seconds and therefore that they make no contribution to deep, liquid markets. Our analysis shows that only 1.2% of high-frequency traders held positions for an average of two minutes or less, 18% for less than 10 minutes and 51% for less than 30 minutes; and

(b) there is some basis in fact for other perceptions (e.g. about high-frequency trading creating excessive noise and exhibiting predatory or ‘gaming’ behaviours), but other traders are also contributing to the problem.

Both [the HFT and Dark Pools] taskforces have found evidence of potential breaches of ASIC Market Integrity Rules and the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act), and some matters have been referred to our Enforcement teams for investigation. We have also seen a change in behaviour as a result of our inquiries. For example:

(a) fundamental investors are asking more questions about where and how their orders are executed;
(b) there have been improvements to automated trading risk management controls; and
(c) at least one high-frequency trader has ceased trading in Australia.

The main problem with HFT is investor perceptions that they are paying more for stocks than they should be. HFT trading profits can only come out of investors pockets. While the ASX receives massive fees from HFT traders, the erosion of investor trust in fair pricing is too serious to ignore. Failure to address this could see investors migrate to other exchanges or platforms, especially if there is a transparent auction process where HFT traders are unable to intercede.

Cyprus: Deposit insurance and moral hazard

The outcry over Cyprus levy on depositors in defaulting banks raises the question: Why were depositors not more wary of where they deposited their funds? Not all banks are created equal. The reason is deposit insurance for deposits under €100,000 implied that the government would stand behind its banks and rescue depositors should the banks ever default. The problem is that no one considered the possibility that all the banks would suffer losses sufficient that the government would be forced to default on both its explicit and implied obligations.

Some time ago I wrote about the moral hazard of deposit insurance:

Deposit Insurance: When too much of a good idea becomes a bad idea

Deposit insurance was introduced in the 1930s and saved the US banking system from extinction. Administered by the FDIC, and funded by a levy on all banking institutions, deposit insurance, however, encourages moral hazard. Depositors need not concern themselves with the solvency of the bank where they deposit their funds so long as deposits are FDIC insured. High-risk institutions are able to compete for deposits on an equal footing with well-run, low-risk competitors. This inevitably leads to higher failure rates, as in the Savings & Loan crisis of the 1980s.

The FDIC does a good job of policing deposit-takers, but no regulator can substitute for market forces. Deposit insurance is critical during times of crisis, but should be scaled back when the crisis has passed. Either limit insured deposits to say $20,000 or only insure deposits to say 90% of value, where the depositor takes the first loss of 10%. That should be sufficient to keep depositors mindful as to where they bank. And restore the competitive advantage to well-run institutions.

Requiring depositors to take the first loss of 10 percent should be standard practice for deposit insurance. The same should hold true for bank creditors. But we need to distinguish between insolvency — where liabilities exceed assets — and a liquidity event where the central bank is only called on to provide temporary respite. If the bank is rescued from insolvency by the regulator, bond holders should be required to take an equivalent haircut — painful yet not life-threatening. No one is entitled to a free ride. And bank shareholders, if a there is a bail-out, should lose everything — similar to the Swedish approach in the 1990s.

Cyprus Deposit Levy: No Panic Yet But Scary Long-Term Consequences – Forbes

Karl Whelan, Professor of Economics at University College, Dublin reminds us:

….the fact that we don’t see lines at ATMs in Spain and Italy doesn’t mean there isn’t a bank run going on. The Northern Rock episode was a complete anomaly. Modern bank runs stem from people pushing buttons to execute electronic withdrawals of large amounts of funds. For example, I was living in Ireland in 2010 when non-residents pulled €186 billion out of Irish banks between the end of July and the end of December. This was over 100% of Irish GDP and yet there wasn’t a single sign of panic among retail depositors.

Read more at Cyprus Deposit Levy: No Panic Yet But Scary Long-Term Consequences – Forbes.

Local government: the Lakewood model

In his report for the Urban Taskforce Australia, Professor Percy Allan recommends that local government adopt the Lakewood model of contracting in services. Lakewood was a sleepy California town threatened with being engulfed by urban sprawl — until they found a novel way of managing costs and improving services.

Lakewood of the early 1950s was David fighting the Goliath of Long Beach, a city intent on gobbling up its unincorporated neighbour parcel by parcel. The legal turf battles were exhausting Lakewood’s defenders, most of whom were transplants drawn to the promise of this sleepy village-turned-post-war boomtown. Then along came John Sanford Todd, a struggling attorney and proud Lakewood resident, who dreamed up a way to preserve his community’s independence without it going broke: It would become a new kind of city, one that contracted out for police protection, trash collection, fire fighting – just about every service a city provides.

That practice is commonplace in the USA today, but it was a revelation a half century ago. Todd’s vision, dubbed “the Lakewood Plan,” became a model of local government that informed incorporation drives throughout Southern California and beyond. Suburbia took shape in a rash of “contract cities,” including the neighbouring Dairy Valley (now Cerritos), La Puente, Bellflower, Duarte, Irwindale, Norwalk and Santa Fe Springs, which sprang up in such rapid succession that some observers began proclaiming the end of big cities.

There may even be opportunities to extend this model to metropolitan or state level, where states contract in and share the costs of centralized services provided by specialist corporations. This could apply to areas as diverse as road transport, police services and payroll functions.

Australia: Sydney is reaching a liveability crisis

Professor Percy Allan kindly sent me a copy a report, to which he contributed, on living conditions in Sydney — prepared by the Urban Taskforce. Here are some interesting excerpts:

Over the next 20 years Sydney will need at least 600,000 new homes located in infill sites and in greenfield sites on the fringes of the metropolitan area. But Sydney has not built sufficient homes over recent years with its current production only half that of Victoria on a per capita basis. Already the average house cost in Sydney is one of the highest in the world and this is impacting on affordability for many families. The Sydney median house is $100,000 more expensive than the equivalent in Melbourne. The average weekly earnings of a first homebuyer can afford a mortgage of $331,000 while the average house price in Sydney is $563,300. The lack of housing supply has led to an increase in rents by 40% over the last 5 years…….

Conclusion

Local government has aggravated Sydney’s housing crisis by:
• Not rezoning sufficient land for affordable multiple dwellings,
• Not adopting clear consistent plans and regulations to guide permissible development,
• Not ensuring individual development assessments are independent of political and vested interests,
• Not spending enough on capital works thereby creating a large backlog of unsatisfactory community infrastructure,
• Using depreciation provisions and reserves for non-capital purposes,
• Under-borrowing for infrastructure enhancements thereby forcing new homebuyers to contribute disproportionately towards this end,
• Not sharing the cost of greenfield infrastructure with existing communities that inherited free public assets from previous generations, and
• Not sharing or outsourcing activities that would benefit from economies of scale and scope nor focusing on specific place management to better respond to community needs at a street level.

Quote: Margaret Thatcher

Watch your thoughts for they become words.
Watch your words for they become actions.
Watch your actions for they become habits.
Watch your habits for they become your character.
And watch your character for it becomes your destiny.
What we think, we become.
My father always said that… and I think I am fine.”
~ Margaret Thatcher

ASX and Asia fall

The ASX 200 retreated more than 2.0% Monday after the Cyprus deposit grab unsettled financial markets. Expect another test of support at 4980. Breakout would warn of a correction, while recovery above 5150 would signal an advance to 5500*. Declining 21-day Twiggs Money Flow indicates medium-term selling pressure.
ASX 200 Index

* Target calculation: 5000 + ( 5000 – 4500 ) = 5500

Dow Jones Japan Index dropped about 1.5%. Follow through below short-term support would indicate no more than retracement to the rising trendline.
Dow Jones Japan Index
Dow Jones Hong Kong Index has fallen about 2.0% so far. Breach of support at 472 signals a correction.
Dow Jones Hong Kong Index
Dow Jones Singapore Index has fallen 1.0% in the morning and we can expect further weakness in the p.m.
Dow Jones Singapore Index

European markets are likely to open lower. If the US follows and finishes the day with a weak close, negative sentiment could start to feed on itself, tipping global markets into a correction. Overall, the primary trend in the US and Australia remains positive.