Can ‘New’ Keynesianism Save the Chinese Economy? | The Diplomat

Excellent summary of China’s growth dilemna by Dr Yanfei Li, Energy Economist at the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) [emphasis added]:

To conclude, national capitalism, which aims to help the Chinese economy move up the global value chain through technological catching up, can be considered part of the essence of the “new” Keynesianism – in other words, the Chinese approach to intervention in the current economic downturn. It will certainly continue to make significant progress in certain well-targeted areas, given enough time. However, there are two key dimensions to measuring how successful the strategy will be. One is the timeline: how long it takes for such efforts to be translated into significant productivity gains for the whole economy. Second, whether or not these selected areas, especially AI and robotics, can bring about a major productivity boost as seen with the IT boom in the 1990s and early 2000s.

In addition, national capitalism, a centralized strategy, is an intrinsically high-risk approach to technological development. Even with well-informed decisions, such as the case of Japan in developing HDTV, there are always surprises. The Chinese government can only hope that it has chosen the right technologies to pursue.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that the other part of China’s “New” Keynsianism, namely the One Belt One Road initiative, which is about exporting the products and services of over-capacity, infrastructure-related industries overseas, also seems riskier than usual. Put another way, if these proposed infrastructure projects in targeted developing countries were attractive and low risk, they would have been financed and done. The fact that they are not itself implies higher risks are involved.

At this point, policymakers must look inward: They must identify and implement all necessary reforms to improve the micro-level efficiency of the Chinese economy. And this always implies the importance of truly open, competitive, transparent and fair markets for all industries. That is a vastly superior approach to the Ponzi game of emphasizing ways to manipulate the property market to keep prices climbing ever higher.

Source: Can ‘New’ Keynesianism Save the Chinese Economy? | The Diplomat

Where oil goes, stocks will follow

Patrick Chovanec

From Patrick Chovanec, Chief Strategist at Silvercrest Asset Management:

…..so far this year stock market sentiment has taken many of its cues from the price of oil. On any given day, if you knew which way oil prices moved, you probably could tell which way the stock market moved. While we believe this linkage fails to recognize the critical distinctions we have so often highlighted, it can’t be ignored in anticipating future market movements, at least in the near-term. The recent firming of oil prices reflects some important developments. After more than a year, we are finally seeing the initial signs of capitulation on the supply side: U.S. oil output has topped out and the most vulnerable OPEC members are agitating for cutbacks. Nevertheless, accumulated crude oil inventories remain at record high levels, which makes us wary concluding that the oil market has reached a hard bottom. While we think the oil price, and the producer industry, will gradually recover, we also think “consensus” expectations of a dramatic +20% gain in S&P 500 operating earnings this year, driven by a large and sudden rebound in the energy and materials sectors, continue to be overly optimistic. With this in mind, we are likely to see more sentiment-driven volatility in U.S. stock prices ahead, even as the U.S. economy continues on its path of slow growth.

Keep a weather eye on the flattening yield curve and shrinking bank interest margins. If these continue to shrink, “slow growth” could easily become “no growth”.

Bob Doll: It May Take Better News for the Rally to Continue

Bob Doll

From Bob Doll at Nuveen Investments:

It May Take Better News for the Rally to Continue

Financial markets appear to be normalizing in recent weeks after the risk asset rout that started the year. We would caution, however, that market improvements have come about because the news has become less bad, not because it has turned good. Investor sentiment is fragile and will likely remain so for some time. One of the key variables remains oil prices. Oil markets have stabilized in recent weeks, but volatility and a renewed downturn could occur anytime. We also believe we need a sustained improvement in U.S. and Chinese economic data before investors grow more confident. Finally, the global political system remains a wildcard. The current focus is on the possibility of the United Kingdom leaving the European Union. The odds favor the status quo, but a potential “brexit” would be destabilizing for the U.K., and the uncertainty is fueling downward pressure on risk assets.

I agree with Bob’s view that a broad US recession is unlikely. Energy and Materials sectors are contracting but the rest of the market has so far held up well. But I am concerned that profit margins are falling and sales growth is slowing — which could lead to weaker stock prices.

Shrinking bank net interest margins and a flattening yield curve both warn of a future credit contraction, however, that would make recession highly likely. Based on past (reactive rather than proactive) performance by the Fed we cannot expect swift action to avoid this threat.

Source: Weekly Investment Commentary from Bob Doll | Nuveen Investments

China’s trilemma—and a possible solution | Brookings Institution

Ben Bernanke: The Courage to Act

From Ben Bernanke:

China faces the classic policy trilemma of international economics, that a country cannot simultaneously have more than two of the following three: (1) a fixed exchange rate; (2) independent monetary policy; and (3) free international capital flows. Accordingly, China’s ability to manage its exchange rate may depend, among other factors, on its willingness and ability to adjust on other policy margins.

…..An economy that is growing more slowly, and in which monetary easing is the principal macroeconomic response, is not an economy that offers high returns to domestic savers. Consequently, Chinese households and firms who are able to do so are spurning yuan-denominated investments and looking abroad for higher returns. However, increased private capital outflows also constitute a flight from the yuan toward the dollar and other currencies; that, in turn, puts downward pressure on China’s exchange rate.

In the short run, the PBOC can offset this pressure by selling some of its enormous stocks of dollar-denominated securities and buying yuan; indeed, Chinese reserves have fallen over $700 billion over the past year and a half. With more than $3 trillion in reserves yet remaining, China should be able to defend its exchange rate for some time. If nothing else changes, however, eventually China will run low on reserves and will no longer be willing or able to buy up yuan in the foreign-exchange market. At that point the currency would fall, probably sharply….

The former Fed Chairman’s analysis of possible solutions provides insight into the extent of the problem:

  1. Sharp devaluation would cause global deflation and spark currency wars;
  2. Controls on capital outflows are unlikely to be effective and would discourage investment; and
  3. Fiscal policies aimed at re-balancing the economy and increased welfare payments would need massive scale to have an impact.

It is clear there is a giant panda (rather than an elephant) loose in the lifeboat which is likely to destabilize the global economy over the next decade.

Source: China’s trilemma—and a possible solution | Brookings Institution

IMF issues warning on global growth as China exports plunge | FT.com

From FT.com:

In dollar terms China’s exports fell 25.4 per cent in February from a year earlier, the worst one-month decline since early 2009 and down from an 11.2 per cent drop in January. Imports fell 13.8 per cent, trimming losses after an 18.8 per cent fall in January.

The IMF is growing increasingly concerned about the state of the global economy because of what it sees as signs of a further slowdown. It has already said it is likely to lower its 3.4 per cent growth forecast for this year when it issues its next round of predictions in April.

Not a good time to bet on rising oil and commodity prices.

Source: IMF issues warning on global growth as China exports plunge – FT.com

Iron ore rally short-lived, prices to come off: Goldman Sachs

From Huileng Tan at CNBC:

Hard data however is not supportive of the [recent iron ore] price moves.

“We are yet to find evidence of higher-than-expected steel demand – whether in the order books of individual steel producers or in the official data for new orders. Based on the information currently available, the seasonal increase in demand appears only marginally stronger than last year,” Goldman Sachs said.

Source: Iron ore rally short-lived, prices to come off: Goldman Sachs

Iron ore rally won’t last: HSBC tips $US39 by 2017

From Stephen Cauchi at SMH:

HSBC is the latest to join a chorus of voices warning that the rally in iron ore prices may be soon be curtailed, with global oversupply and waning demand from China about to kick in.

…..”Iron ore supply has ramped up rapidly in recent years as major projects in Australia and Brazil come on line,” said HSBC.

“The problem, now, is that production is still likely to expand over the rest of the decade as capacity already in Australia and Brazil continues to come on line.”

Source: Iron ore rally won’t last: HSBC tips $US39 by 2017

Minack exclusive: Australian recession risk still live | MacroBusiness

From David Llewellyn-Smith:

…..real GDP remains a misleading measure of how Australia is faring. The key to the mining boom was not GDP strength – real GDP growth was weaker than in the 1990s – but the income uplift from rising terms of trade. The issue now is the income drag from the terms of trade falling. Real per capita net income fell 2¼% through 2016. Australia is now the midst of the longest period of declining per capita income since quarterly data started in 1959 (Exhibit 1).

Source: Minack exclusive: Australian recession risk still live – MacroBusiness