Bo’s Ides of March « Patrick Chovanec

Patrick Chovanec: Top Party leaders, regardless of political philosophy, had come to dislike Bo [Xilai], not as a person per se — by all accounts, Bo is an extraordinarily charming man — but as a political persona, at least in his Chongqing incarnation, for three reasons:

First, they were offended by his courting of the media and his vigorous self-promotion, which showed a lack of appropriate deference and humility to established power channels and ways of resolving competition. Second, they felt threatened, because few of them were equipped to compete on this basis, if that’s what it took. Third, they were alarmed by Bo’s tactic of “mobilizing the masses” in ways that explicitly invoked the Cultural Revolution, which called up deep-seated fears that populist fervor could be used as a weapon against rival leaders within the Party — as indeed happened during the Cultural Revolution, to horrific results.

via Bo’s Ides of March « Patrick Chovanec.

RBA gambles on China – MacroBusiness

Glenn Stevens: Those at home [Australia] see this as well. As consumers, they have responded to the higher exchange rate with record levels of international travel. As producers, however, they also see, with increasing clarity, that the rise in the relative price of natural resources amounts to a global and epochal shift, which carries important implications for economic structure in Australia, as it does everywhere else. Some sectors of the economy will grow in importance as they invest and employ to take advantage of higher prices. Other sectors will get relatively smaller, particularly in the traded sector, as they face relatively lower prices for their products and competition for inputs from the stronger sectors. The exchange rate response to this shift in fundamentals is sending very clearly the signal to shift the industry mix, though this would occur at any exchange rate. The shift in relative prices is a shift in global prices that is more or less invariant to the level of the Australian dollar…..

Delusional Economics: And there is the China gamble laid bare for all to see. It is true that in relative pricing terms Australia’s income has increased but, as the Governor alludes to, the prices we are paying for cheaper imports is a hollowing out of some industries and a corresponding restructuring of the labour force. By not intervening via monetary and/or fiscal policy in the capital flows associated with the commodities boom the government and the RBA have made it clear that a restructure of the economy will be the outcome.

However, as I have pointed out in my analysis of Europe , and Mr Stevens goes on to say later in the speech, structural change is difficult and expensive. By allowing the economy to restructure in this way we are making a one-way bet on China. That is, if we’ve got it wrong on Beijing, we are in seriously deep trouble because there is no Plan B.

via RBA gambles on China – MacroBusiness.

EconoMonitor » All Feasts Must Come to an End: China’s Debt & Investment Fuelled Growth

Satyajit Das: New lending by Chinese banks in 2009 and 2010 was around 40% of GDP. New bank loans in 2009 and 2010 totalled around $1.1-1.4 trillion, an increase from $740 billion in 2008. Total outstanding loans in the economy have jumped by nearly 50 per cent over the past two years.

Around 90% of this lending was directed towards investment in building, plant, machinery and infrastructure by State Owned Enterprises (“SOE”). In 2010, China allocated over $2.6 trillion to investment expenditure – the highest proportion of GDP of any major economy in the world. According to the World Bank, almost all of China’s growth since 2008 has come from “government influenced expenditure”.

via EconoMonitor : EconoMonitor » All Feasts Must Come to an End: China’s Debt & Investment Fuelled Growth, Part 1.

Selling pressure warns of correction

Medium-term selling pressure, signaled by bearish divergence on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow, continues to warn of a correction in US and Asia-Pacific markets. The Dow Jones TSM (formerly “Wilshire”) Asia-Pacific Index displays a bearish divergence since mid-February. Reversal below 1280 would confirm a correction.

Dow Jones TSM Asia-Pacific Index

Dow Jones Industrial Average shows a similar bearish divergence, though the latest down-turn was exaggerated by triple-witching hour [TW] on Friday. Reversal below 12750 would confirm a correction.

Dow Jones Industrial Average

Hong Kong & China

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index is in a primary up-trend. Having retraced briefly, it appears to have found support at 21000. Recovery above 21500 would signal an advance to 22500*.

Hang Seng Index

* Target calculation: 20000 + ( 20000 – 17500 ) = 22500

The Shanghai Composite Index, however, remains in a primary down-trend. Breakout above 2500 would, however, suggest that the trend is weakening. Respect of support at 2300 would suggest reversal to a primary up-trend, while failure of support would warn of another decline.

Shanghai Composite Index

* Target calculation: 2100 – ( 2500 – 2100 ) = 1700

Hong Kong & Shanghai

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index retreated Wednesday in response to a sharp fall in Shanghai. Bearish divergence on 21-day Twiggs Money Flow warns of a correction, but as long as the lower trend channel at 20,000 is respected the primary up-trend remains intact.

Hang Seng Index

* Target calculation: 20000 + ( 20000 – 17500 ) = 22500

Dow Jones Shanghai Index fell sharply to test support at 295. Failure of support would warn of a correction.

Dow Jones Shanghai Index

Shanghai Composite Index shows a similar fall. Follow-through below 2380 would signal a correction to primary support at 2150.

Shanghai Composite Index

China’s growth model running out of steam – FT.com

For the first time in eight years, the Chinese government’s annual growth target has been lowered, to 7.5 per cent GDP growth for all of 2012…..

The new number represents Beijing’s recognition that the investment-driven, export-dependent growth model that has propelled it from an impoverished backwater to the world’s second-largest economy in just three decades is running out of steam……

The goal is to shift growth away from investment in polluting, energy-intensive, unsustainable industries and towards domestic consumption, particularly of services and “green goods”, such as energy-efficient vehicles and environmentally friendly building materials.

“We will move faster to set up a permanent mechanism for boosting consumption,” Wen Jiabao, the premier, said at the opening session of China’s rubber stamp parliament on Monday. “We will vigorously adjust income distribution, increase the incomes of low- and middle-income groups and enhance people’s ability to consume.”

via China’s growth model running out of steam – FT.com.

Comment:~ The trap China faces is that raising wages in order to promote domestic consumption will reduce competitiveness in export markets and harm its current export-driven growth model. Not only are exports likely to fall but, with a high propensity to save, there is no guarantee that Chinese consumption will rise as fast as wages.

China & Hong Kong

The Shanghai Composite Index rallied strongly above 2300 after breaking out of its downward trend channel. 13-Week Twiggs Money Flow rising strongly indicates good buying pressure. Expect resistance at 2550. Breakout above this level would offer a weak (primary) reversal signal. Stronger confirmation would come if retracement successfully tests support at 2300.

Shanghai Composite Index

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index has already started a primary up-trend, with an initial target of 22,500*. Reversal below 21,000 would signal retracement to test the new support level at 20,000, but 13-Week Twiggs Money Flow again indicates buying pressure and we can expect the primary up-trend to continue.

Hang Seng Index

* Target calculation: 20,000 + ( 20,000 – 17,500 ) = 22,500