Consumers May Be Spending More, but They’re Not Happy About It – Real Time Economics – WSJ

The percentage of Americans saying they were cutting back on their spending rose from 66% at the start of the year to 72% in September, where it has stayed for nine straight weeks. Spending, however, was up 5% in September from a year ago…..[it could be] that, more than two years into an anemic economic recovery, Americans are simply settling into a new routine, somewhere in between the forced austerity of the recession and the heady days that came before. Asked by Gallup whether they are watching their spending “very closely,” 88% of Americans said yes. That figure has hardly moved in two years.

via Consumers May Be Spending More, but They’re Not Happy About It – Real Time Economics – WSJ.

The World from Berlin: Will Merkel Change Her Tune on Euro Bonds? – SPIEGEL ONLINE

The left-leaning Berliner Zeitung writes:

“People in the euro crisis have become accustomed to one constant: What Chancellor Angela Merkel categorically rejects today can still be implemented tomorrow. That makes the euro-bond debate … so exciting. A ‘no’ from Berlin doesn’t necessarily mean the last word.”

“There are many indications that Germany will have to finally give in again and accept one of two solutions: Either increased bond purchases by the ECB or euro bonds. But in exchange, Merkel will exact a price. She wants to use the acute urgency to construct a euro zone that corresponds to her vision…. If Europe allows this new currency union with rigid controls for countries that exceed debt limits, then Merkel will open herself up to things she has so adamantly rejected. But she’s begun a dangerous game. It could come to pass that that the currency union she wants to stabilize according to German plans may no longer exist. Then even the best treaty amendments won’t help.”

via The World from Berlin: Will Merkel Change Her Tune on Euro Bonds? – SPIEGEL ONLINE – News – International.

RAFI ETF Investing: Q&A With Rob Arnott | ETF Database

When you think about capitalization weighting in stocks the drawbacks are fairly evident. When you talk about cap weighting in bonds, the drawbacks are flagrantly obvious.

With cap weighting, consider that Australia has three times the GDP of Greece, and Greece has three times the debt burden of Australia. Why should we want to own three times as much in Greek debt as Australian debt? In fact, Australia’s ability to service debt is at least three times that of Greece, and so wouldn’t it make more sense to have an index for bonds that weights countries’ bond debt in accordance with GDP and other measures of the economic footprint of a country?

via RAFI ETF Investing: Q&A With Rob Arnott | ETF Database.

Getting The Most Out Of Your Bond ETFs

Market cap weighting has long been the traditional strategy for not only ETFs, but almost all basket funds. But as the ETF industry expanded, many have realized the benefits of alternative weighting strategies as a number of them outdid their cap-weighted counterparts. More recently these strategies have waded into fixed income territory and yielded several interesting bond ETF products:

  • SPDR Barclays Capital Issuer Scored Corporate Bond ETF (CBND) – This ETF uses three fundamental factors to determine the weight given to each debt it holds: return on assets, interest coverage, and current ratio.
  • Fundamental High Yield Corporate Bond Portfolio (PHB) – This product uses the RAFI approach to selecting its holdings using four factors: book value of assets, gross sales, gross dividends, and cash flow–each based on five-year averages. Note that PHB is classified in the high yield or “junk bond” category.
  • Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond (PFIG) – PFIG also uses the RAFI weighting methodology, but instead applies it to investment grade corporate bonds.

via Getting The Most Out Of Your Bond ETFs.

The Wages of Economic Ignorance – Robert Skidelsky – Project Syndicate

Despite austerity, the forecast of this year’s UK structural deficit has increased from 6.5% to 8% – requiring an extra £22 billion ($34.6 billion) in cuts a year. Prime Minister David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne blame the eurozone crisis; in fact, their own economic illiteracy is to blame. Unfortunately for all of us, the explanation bears repeating nowadays. Depressions, recessions, contractions – call them what you will – occur because the private-sector spends less than it did previously. This means that its income falls, because spending by one firm or household is income for another.

In this situation, government deficits rise naturally, as tax revenues decline and spending on unemployment insurance and other benefits rises. These “automatic stabilizers” plug part of the private-sector spending gap. But if the government starts reducing its own deficit before private-sector spending recovers, the net result will be a further decline in total spending, and hence in total income, causing the government’s deficit to widen, rather than narrow. True, if governments stop spending altogether, deficits will eventually fall to zero. People will starve to death in the interim, but the budget will be balanced.

via The Wages of Economic Ignorance – Robert Skidelsky – Project Syndicate.

Self-serving myths of Europe’s neo-Calvinists – Telegraph Blogs

From a paper by Philip Whyte and Simon Tilford for the Centre for European Reform… a pro-EU group with a broadly free-market leaning.

Eurozone leaders now face a choice between two unpalatable alternatives. Either they accept that the eurozone is institutionally flawed and do what is necessary to turn it into a more stable arrangement. This will require some of them to go beyond what their voters seem prepared to allow, and to accept that a certain amount of ‘rule-breaking’ is necessary in the short term if the eurozone is to survive intact. Or they can stick to the fiction that confidence can be restored by the adoption and enforcement of tougher rules. This option will condemn the eurozone to self-defeating policies that hasten defaults, contagion and eventual break-up.

via Self-serving myths of Europe’s neo-Calvinists – Telegraph Blogs.

Bond markets v. the Deficit Supercommittee – Evan Newmark

The bond markets will have their say. They have voted in Europe — electing new governments in Greece, Italy and Spain — and the time is fast approaching when they will cast their vote in the US as well.

[gigya src=”http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/VideoPlayerMain.swf” flashVars=”videoGUID={17248341-D867-46A5-B39F-697856205D59}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false” width=”512″ height=”363″]

Cut in Europe Bank Lending Has Wide Impact – WSJ.com

European banks in recent years dramatically boosted lending to emerging markets and were among the biggest cross-border lenders in these countries. Their retreat has tightened credit in industries—from aircraft to media to mining — squeezing economies already feeling the effects of reduced demand from the developed world for their exports….”We’re in a very vulnerable position that’s definitely impacting global growth,” Gail Kelly, chief executive of Australia’s Westpac Bank said at The Wall Street Journal CEO Council last week. “It’s certainly impacting in my country and in Asia.”

via Cut in Europe Bank Lending Has Wide Impact – WSJ.com.

China and Hong Kong

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index is testing medium-term support at 18000; breach would signal another test of 16000*. 13-Week Twiggs Money Flow below zero warns of rising selling pressure.

Hang Seng Index

* Target calculation: 16 – ( 20 − 16 ) = 12

The Shanghai Composite is testing medium-term support at 2400. Failure of primary support at 2300 would offer a medium-term target of 2000*. The long-term trend is edging lower in a controlled descent, so conventional target calculations do not apply. Recovery above 2600 is less likely, but would signal another test of the descending trendline.

Shanghai Composite Index

* Target calculation: 2300 – ( 2600 − 2300 ) = 2000